Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

2.48s

  • State ex rel. Votava v. Brown

    78 Ohio St. (N.S.) 452 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1908

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wills Creek Coal Co. v. Brown

    84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 458 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1911

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Nolan v. Brown

    114 Ohio St. 311 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Board of Education v. Board of Education

    4 Ohio Law. Abs. 256 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.

    139 Ohio St. 427 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1942

    Speaking of the Alabama "Teacher Tenure Act," the court remarked in the case of Board of Education of Marshall County v. … Much of what has been said in connection with the Creig case is applicable to the Louella Brown case.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Samuelson

    24 Ohio St. 3d 62 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 1986

    Wright, v. Weyandt (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 194, 197 [ 4 O.O.3d 383 ], quoting White v. Brocaw (1863), 14 Ohio St. 339, 346 ; and Shallenberger v. Motorists Mut. Ins. … Brown and Wright, JJ., concur. Parrino, Locher and Douglas, JJ., dissent. Parrino, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Board of Education

    71 Ohio St. 3d 251 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1994

    requirements of R.C. 3319.111(A), and such failure will permit a reviewing court to order the board to reemploy the teacher pursuant to R.C. 3319.11(G)(7).” 3 Naylor v. … See Farmer v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Weed v. Board of Revision

    53 Ohio St. 2d 20 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1978

    Hill v. Higdon (1855), 5 Ohio St. 243, 247 . Taxation of real property being constitutionally authorized, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is both reasonable and lawful and is, therefore, affirmed. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Berea City School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    106 Ohio St. 3d 269 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2005

    Co. v. … However, in Ratner v. Stark Cty.

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • Vandalia-Butler City Schools Board of Education v. Montgomery County Board of Revision

    130 Ohio St. 3d 291 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2011

    [Cite as Vandalia-Butler City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Revision, 130 Ohio St.3d 291, 2011-Ohio-5078.] VANDALIA-BUTLER CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. … MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Vandalia-Butler City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Revision, 130 Ohio St.3d 291, 2011-Ohio-5078.]

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • State v. Kegler (In re Brown)

    2018 Ohio 5465 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 5, 2018

    Judge Brown states that he has set aside the unpleasantness of the 2009 case, and Ms. … The cases may proceed before Judge Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Columbiana Cty. Jail

    176 Ohio St. 3d 763 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 17, 2024

    BROWN v. COLUMBIANA COUNTY J AIL ET AL . [Cite as State ex rel. Brown v. Columbiana Cty. Jail, 2024-Ohio-4969.] … Griffin v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of Commissioners

    53 Ohio St. 2d 56 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1978

    C. 2731.13, each member of the respondent board is fined $500. * The members of the respondent board may purge themselves of the foregoing contempt finding and fines by complying with the 1965 order of this court within 90 … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. By using the contempt statutes cited herein, we do not intimate that they are sources of this court's power to punish those in contempt of its orders.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Reesman

    63 Ohio St. 2d 130 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1980

    Devine, v. Hoermle (1959), 168 Ohio St. 461 , is misplaced due to the factual differences between that case and the present action. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ash v. Board of Review

    26 Ohio St. 3d 158 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1986

    Co. (1971), 27 Ohio St. 2d 268, 276 [ 56 O.O.2d 160 ]; Cowen v. State, ex rel. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Parrino, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Columbus City School District Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of Revision

    134 Ohio St. 3d 529 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 2012

    Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision, 134 Ohio St.3d 529, 2012-Ohio-5680.] COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    44 Ohio St. 2d 83 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1975

    Co., v. … Brown and P, Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Toledo Public Schools Board of Education v. Lucas County Board of Revision

    125 Ohio St. 3d 464 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 3, 2010

    {¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed on the authority of Toledo Pub. Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Lucas Cty. … Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • South Euclid/Lyndhurst Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    74 Ohio St. 3d 314 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1996

    See Safeway Stores v. … . * * * V R.C. 5717.01 states: “An appeal from a decision of a county board of revision may be taken to the board of tax appeals within thirty days after notice of the decision of the county board of revision is mailed as

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Best v. Brown

    119 Ohio St. 645 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1928

    Kauffmann, v. Brown, Secy. of State, 111 Ohio St., 289 . It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the writ *646 of mandamus prayed for be, and the same hereby is, denied. Demurrer sustained and writ denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.