Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

0.41s

  • Columbus Bar Assn. v. Halliburton-Cohen

    94 Ohio St. 3d 217 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 30, 2002

    COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. HALLIBURTON-COHEN. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Halliburton-Cohen, 2002-Ohio-640.] … The board adopted the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the panel. {¶ 8} On review of the record, we adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Jones

    134 Ohio St. 3d 590 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 2012

    {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467 , 2012-Ohio-5738 , 983 N.E.2d 341 . … O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Application of Davis

    224 N.E.3d 1053 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 20, 2023

    . {¶ 3} In October 2022, a three-member panel of the board conducted a hearing, during which it heard testimony from Davis. … V(13)(D)(5)(a)(i) through (iv). {¶ 8} Davis was arrested in Lexington, Kentucky, in November 2007.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Galinas

    76 Ohio St. 3d 87 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1996

    Bar Assn. v. … In Krischbaum v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Marc Glassman, Inc. v. Levin

    119 Ohio St. 3d 254 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 5, 2008

    Unlike in the present case, the Board of Tax Appeals in Quotron found that Quotron’s service was “clearly antithetical” to services that involve interpretation or analysis of data. Quotron Systems, Inc. v. … . {¶ 16} In analyzing the service provided in this case, we have determined that the Board of Tax Appeals’ decision that is most directly on point is PNC Bank, Ohio, N.A. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Fant v. Mengel

    62 Ohio St. 3d 197 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1991

    Scanlon, v. Deters (1989), 45 Ohio St.3d 376 , 544 N.E.2d 680 . Accordingly, the court of appeals correctly granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Franks v. Lopez

    69 Ohio St. 3d 462 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1994

    For the reasons stated in my concurrence in Garrett v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Hickman v. Capots

    45 Ohio St. 3d 324 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1989

    Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co. (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 190, 193 , 532 N.E. 2d 753, 756 . The cases cited by appellant, Mack v. McCune (C.A. 10, 1977), 551 F. 2d 251 , and Robinson v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 168 timesPublished
  • Melvin v. Weiant

    36 Ohio St. (N.S.) 184 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1880

    See Hollingsworth v. Shaw, 19 Ohio St. 430 . This precise question was before the commission in Davis v. Brown, 27 Ohio St. 326 , where it was held that no such' exception prevailed. … Brown was correctly decided. We are all agreed, however, that that case ought not to be-overruled.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. McCauley

    114 Ohio St. 3d 461 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 29, 2007

    Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Rothermel, 104 Ohio St.3d 413 , 2004-Ohio-6559 , 819 N.E.2d 1099, ¶ 18 , citing Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … . {¶ 23} Relator and the board urge us to indefinitely suspend respondent’s license to practice law, and the board further recommends that respondent be required to take 12 hours of accredited continuing legal education in

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Brenner

    2018 Ohio 3118 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2018

    Objections sustained in part and respondent granted leave to file his answer with the Board of Professional Conduct. Matter remanded to the board for further proceedings under Gov.Bar R. V(12). … The court further orders that the interim default suspension imposed against respondent on this date shall remain in place while this matter is pending before the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Cuyahoga County Hospital v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

    27 Ohio St. 3d 25 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1986

    Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc. (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 321 . … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. 1 Ohio Adm.

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Ohio Committee of the Central Station Electrical Protection Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission

    50 Ohio St. 2d 169 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1977

    Cincinnati v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1949), 151 Ohio St. 353 ; Ohio Edison Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm., supra ( 173 Ohio St. 478 ); Worthington Hills Civic Assn. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 11 . … BrowN, P. BrowN and Sweeney, JJ., concur. The findings of the commission read, in part: “(18) The rates ordered by. the commission will generate revenue equal to the revenue authorized by the commission.”

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Scott-Chestang

    113 Ohio St. 3d 310 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 9, 2007

    Bar Assn. v. … The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline served respondent with the complaint, but she did not answer, and relator moved for default pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(F).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Para-Legals, Inc.

    106 Ohio St. 3d 455 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 2, 2005

    Id.; Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Columbus Bar Assn. v. Purnell (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 126 , 760 N.E.2d 817 ; Coats, 98 Ohio St.3d 413 , 2003-Ohio-1496 , 786 N.E.2d 449 . {¶ 9} The board considered the factors listed in Gov.Bar R.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cox v. Ohio State Univ. Hosp.

    80 Ohio St. 3d 1220 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1997

    COX, EXR., APPELLANT, v. OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, APPELLEE. [Cite as Cox v. Ohio State Univ. Hosp., 1997-Ohio-409.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. … Montgomery, Attorney General; Emens Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter, William J. Brown and Karl W. Schedler, for appellee. Bricker & Eckler, James J. Hughes, Jr., and Catherine M.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Maley

    119 Ohio St. 3d 217 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 13, 2008

    Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v. Akers, 106 Ohio St.3d 337 , 2005-Ohio-5144 , 835 N.E.2d 29 (imposing an 18-month sentence with 12 months stayed for failure to supervise an employee); and Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Spitzig v. State Ex Rel. Hile

    119 Ohio St. 117 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1928

    . *121 Judge Bradbury, who wrote the opinion in the above case, also wrote the opinion of this court in the case of Board of Education v. State, 51 Ohio St., 531 , 38 N. E., 614 , 25 L. R. A., 770, 46 Am. St. … As good an illustration of the principle involved here as can be given is found in the syllabus of the case of Board of Education v. McLandsborough, 36 Ohio St., 227 , 38 Am.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Spratz

    58 Ohio St. 2d 61 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 2, 1979

    Seemingly, State v. … See State v. Siler (1979), 57 Ohio St. 2d 1 , and State v. Singer (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 103 .

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Marshall

    121 Ohio St. 3d 197 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 12, 2009

    Bar Assn. v. Buttacavoli, 96 Ohio St.3d 424 , 2002-Ohio-4743 , 775 N.E.2d 818 , at ¶ 16. … Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.