Case law

Reynolds v. Ross County Children's Services Agency

5 Ohio St. 3d 27 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 18, 1983

See Walker v. Walker (1974), 40 Ohio App. 2d 6 [ 69 O.O.2d 3 ]. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. W. Brown, J., not participating. By the same token, appellant’s !

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Levey

88 Ohio St. 3d 146 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 23, 2000

Therefore, we do not adopt the findings and conclusions of the board on those matters. … The board relied on our holding in Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik & Webster v.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Smith

115 Ohio St. 3d 95 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 29, 2007

Bar Assn. v. … V(6)(F).

Disciplinary Counsel v. McCray

2019 Ohio 4558 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 7, 2019

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. McCray, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-4558.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MCCRAY. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Schwieterman

115 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 29, 2007

See, e.g., Toledo Bar Assn. v. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

NWD 300 Spring, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revisions (Slip Opinion)

2017 Ohio 7579 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 14, 2017

SLIP OPINION NO. 2017-OHIO-7579 NWD 300 SPRING, L.L.C. v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES; REIDY ET AL., APPELLANTS. … Assn. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Cox

83 Ohio St. 3d 218 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1998

V.” This rule does not specify any standards of conduct that are to be observed by lawyers with respect to the public, the legal system, or the legal profession. … The board’s conclusion in count five relying as it does solely upon this rule, count five is dismissed. Likewise, we dismiss the board’s conclusion in count eleven for lack of specificity.

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino

114 Ohio St. 3d 174 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2007

Bar Assn. v. … V(9), during which a monitoring attorney, to be appointed by relator, shall oversee his practice.

State v. Standard Oil Co.

39 Ohio St. 2d 41 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1974

Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. It is appropriate to note here that it is the substance of the transaction between Standard Oil and the station operator rather than its form which is significant. … Kitchen, v. Christman (1972), 31 Ohio St. 2d 64, 67 , 285 N. E. 2d 362 .

State ex rel. Copeland v. Judges of the Court

67 Ohio St. 2d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1981

State v. Catlino (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 183 ; State v. Shepard (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 264 ; State v. Talley (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 190 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Jones

134 Ohio St. 3d 590 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 2012

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467 , 2012-Ohio-5738 , 983 N.E.2d 341 . … O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Baur v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Elections

90 Ohio St. 3d 165 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 22, 2000

BAUR ET AL. v. MEDINA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Baur v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2000-Ohio-49.] … Sinay v.

Pulley v. Malek

25 Ohio St. 3d 95 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1986

See id.; Brown v. General Motors (1974), 38 Ohio St. 2d 286 [ 67 O.O.2d 351 ]; Taylor v. Cincinnati (1944), 143 Ohio St. 426 [ 28 O.O. 369 ]; H. E. Culbertson Co. v. Warden, supra. … Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur. Locher, Holmes and Wright, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kieft

94 Ohio St. 3d 429 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 2002

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. KIEFT. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kieft, 2002-Ohio-1234.] … V(6)(F). {¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court appointed a master commissioner to review the default motion.

In re Hartman

2 Ohio St. 3d 154 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1983

Brown, Sweeney and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., dissent. Former Section 1583, Title 28, U.S. … In Argosy Limited v.

State ex rel. Brockman v. Proctor

35 Ohio St. 2d 79 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1973

The facts in the instant case are on all fours with the facts in Dugan v. Ohio. Chief Justice Taft, in Dugan v. Ohio, supra, at page 64, distinguishes that case from Turney v. Ohio. Mr, Justice Brennan, in Ward v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Corrigan, Celebrezze and P. Brown, JJ., dissent. For exceptions see R. C. 1905.01 and 1901.021,

State v. Jay

130 Ohio St. 3d 239 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 12, 2011

{¶ 1} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Dunlap, 129 Ohio St.3d 461 , 2011-Ohio-4111 , 953 N.E.2d 816 . … O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Walton

147 Ohio St. 3d 357 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 2016

V(13)(B)(5). … Bar Assn. v.

State v. Lloyd

128 Ohio St. 3d 1481 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 4, 2011

I, III, IV, and V. McGee Brown, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V. O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

State v. Kaiser

56 Ohio St. 2d 29 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1978

Brown, J. Four propositions of law are preferred in this appeal. … Brown, Sweeney and Loches, JJ., concur. Leach, C. J., not participating.