Case law

Ludwig Hommel & Co. v. Incorporated Village of Woodsfield

115 Ohio St. 675 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1927

The case of Courson’s Ex’rs. v. … To the same effect is the case of Morse v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaver

121 Ohio St. 3d 393 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 1, 2009

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaver, 121 Ohio St.3d 393, 2009-Ohio-1385.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SHAVER. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaver, 121 Ohio St.3d 393, 2009-Ohio-1385.] … The board adopted the panel’s findings of misconduct and recommendation.

Vestfall v. Levin

114 Ohio St. 3d 1419 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2007

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-T-1054. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to consolidate this case with 2007-0579, Lovell v. … Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-M-782, 2007-0580, Caldwell v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-H-548, 2007-0586, Huelsman v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-R-549, and 2007-0589, Lovell v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mariotti

179 Ohio St. 3d 1221 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 2025

V(14)(A), the Board of Professional Conduct filed with this court a certification of default, alleging that respondent, Mark Mariotti, failed to file an answer to a formal complaint pending before the board. … It is further ordered that respondent is granted leave to file an answer with the board, and this matter is remanded to the board for further proceedings under Gov.Bar R. V(12).

Medina County Bar Ass'n v. Wootton

110 Ohio St. 3d 179 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 23, 2006

Bar Assn. v. … V(6)(F). A master commissioner appointed by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline granted the motion and made findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation, all of which the board adopted.

White v. City of Findlay

108 Ohio St. (N.S.) 475 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1923

Welsh v. State, 126 Ind., 71 , 25 N. E., 883 , 9 L. R. A., 664; Austin v. State, 10 Mo., 591 . … People v. Brown, 85 Mich., 119 , 48 N. W., 158 . The statute prohibiting the sale of liquor in a certain specific locality is not unconstitutional merely because its application is limited and not general. Howell v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. McShane

121 Ohio St. 3d 169 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 25, 2009

V(4)(G). … V(9), the two-year suspension is stayed on the probationary conditions cited by the panel and board.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. VanLandingham

143 Ohio St. 3d 328 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2015

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v.

In re Stanley

178 Ohio St. 3d 1221 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 28, 2025

V(18)(A)(3), the director of the Board of Professional Conduct of the Supreme Court of Ohio submitted to this court a certified copy of a determination of default of a child support order by Cam Ryan Stanley, an attorney … V(23)(A)(1) and from receiving, disbursing, or otherwise handling any client trust funds or property. {¶ 8} It is further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law until (1) the Board

Disciplinary Counsel v. Rudduck

2026 Ohio 1126 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2026

V(12)(G) and (I). If the panel finds misconduct, it must submit a report of its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended sanction to the director of the board. Gov.Bar R. V(I). … The respondent may (1) file objections to the board’s report, Gov.Bar R. V(17)(B)(1), (2) file a no-objection brief in support of the recommended sanction of the board, Gov.Bar R.

Shroades v. Rental Homes, Inc.

68 Ohio St. 2d 20 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1981

Bank (1944), 143 Ohio St. 614 ; Cooper v. Roose (1949), 151 Ohio St. 316 ; Brown v. Cleveland Baseball Co. (1952), 158 Ohio St. 1 ; Pitts v. Cincinnati Metro. Housing Auth. (1953), 160 Ohio St. 129 . … Brown, JJ., concur. W. Brown, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., dissent.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Wagner

117 Ohio St. 3d 456 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 20, 2008

Bar Assn. v. … V(4)(G). {¶ 13} We do not, however, accept the board’s recommendation of an indefinite suspension.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Curry

79 Ohio St. 3d 181 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1997

V(4)(G) *185 requires an attorney to assist in an investigation of a complaint. … the board.

C. Miller Chevrolet, Inc. v. City of Willoughby Hills

38 Ohio St. 2d 298 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1974

See Curtiss v. Cleveland (1957), 166 Ohio St. 509 , 144 N. E. 2d 177 ; State, ex rel. Jack, v. Russell (1954), 162 Ohio St. 281 , 123 N. E. 2d 261 ; 8 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3 Ed.), 107, Section 25.44. … Curtiss v. Cleveland (1959), 170 Ohio St. 127 , 163 N. E. 2d 682 .

Huelsman v. Levin

114 Ohio St. 3d 1419 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2007

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this ease shall be consolidated with 2007-0579, Lovell v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-M-782, 2007-0580, Caldwell v. … Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-H-548, 2007-0584, Vestfall v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-T-1054, and 2007-0589, Lovell v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-A-781, for oral argument.

Caldwell v. Levin

114 Ohio St. 3d 1419 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2007

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this ease shall be consolidated with 2007-0579, Lovell v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-M-782, 2007-0584, Vestfall v. … Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-T-1054, 2007-0586, Huelsman v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-R-549, and 2007-0589, Lovell v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-A-781, for oral argument.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Thomas

124 Ohio St. 3d 498 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 25, 2010

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Thomas, 124 Ohio St.3d 498, 2010-Ohio-604.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. THOMAS. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v Maybaum, 112 Ohio St.3d 93, 2006-Ohio-6507 [858 N.E.2d 359] (Taking client funds being held to pay medical bills). {¶ 33} “* * * In Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

International Harvester Co. v. Evatt

146 Ohio St. 58 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1945

Co. v. Stone, 314 U. S., 577 , 86 L. Ed., 467 , 62 S. Ct., 131 , affirming the case which arose below in Aponaug Mfg. Co. v. State Tax Commission, 190 Miss., 805 , 1 So. (2d), 763 ; and C. H. Musselman Co. v. … Co. v. City of St. Louis, supra. In coming to its decision in the instant case the Board of Tax Appeals followed the holding of this court in the case of Aluminum Co. of America v.

New York Frozen Foods, Inc. v. Bedford Hts. Income Tax Bd. of Rev. (Slip Opinion)

150 Ohio St. 3d 386 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 3, 2016

Accord NLO, Inc. v. Limbach, 66 Ohio St.3d 389, 393 , 613 N.E.2d 193 (1993) (statutory change codified prior case-law holding); Williams v. … Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Allen v. Lutz

111 Ohio St. 333 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1924

In the case of City of Lancaster v. Miller, 58 Ohio St., 558 , at page 575, 51 N. … Frisbie Co. v. City of East Cleveland, 98 Ohio St., 266 , 120 N. E., 309 .