Case law

Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Fernandez

89 Ohio St. 3d 82 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 2000

LORAIN COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. FERNANDEZ. [Cite as Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Fernandez, 2000-Ohio-112.] … See, e.g., Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Johnson (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 146, 702 N.E.2d 409; Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v.

Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. Wallace

134 Ohio St. 3d 359 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 5, 2012

Corp. v. Schwartzwald, 134 Ohio St.3d 13 , 2012-Ohio-5017 , 979 N.E.2d 1214 . O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Dewey

96 Ohio St. 3d 148 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2002

Toledo Bar Assn. v. … V(4)(G).

State ex rel. Bry v. Kirk

42 Ohio St. 2d 454 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1975

Clink, v. Smith (1968), 16 Ohio St. 2d 1 . This court agrees with both contentions. The allegation of proper filing should prevent a dismissal inasmuch as a cause of action has been ‘ ‘ stated. ’ ’ Civ. R. 9 (C). … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Corrigan, J., dissents.

Wampler v. Bach

42 Ohio St. 2d 237 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 1975

Co. v. Kohn (1937), 133 Ohio St. 111, 113 . See Caprita v. Caprita (1945), 145 Ohio St. 5 ; State, ex rel. Rogers, v. Rankin (1950), 154 Ohio St. 23 . … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Evans v. Hope

12 Ohio St. 3d 119 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1984

In Sowers v. … W, Brown, Locher, Holmes and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney and C. Brown, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski

111 Ohio St. 3d 353 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 2006

Mayer v. … See, e.g., State v. Brown (2000), 136 Ohio App.3d 816, 819-820 , 737 N.E.2d 1057 .

In re Brunner

77 Ohio St. 3d 1499 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1996

V(5)(A)(2), the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court certified to the Supreme Court a certified copy of a judgment entry of a felony conviction against L. … V(5)(A)(3), it is ordered and decreed that L. Keith Brunner, a.k.a.

Besl Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission

45 Ohio St. 2d 146 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1976

E. 2d 711 ; Van Gilder v. Denver (1939), 104 Colo. 76 , 89 P. 2d 529 ; Alexander Co. v. Owatonna (1946), 222 Minn. 312 , 24 N. W. 2d 244 ; Main v. Dept. of Highways (1965), 206 Va. 143 , 142 S. E. 2d 524 . … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Appellant’s certificate in Stony’s authorized the transportation of property: “* * * from and to Springfield,.

State v. Sammons

58 Ohio St. 2d 460 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1979

” Columbus v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. See, also, Section 207.13 of the Model Penal Code (Tent., Draft No. 9), now Section 230.4, which is substantially analogous to R. C. 2919.22(A).

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Gottesman

115 Ohio St. 3d 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 20, 2007

A panel of three board members accepted the agreement, found the stipulated DR 1-102(A)(4) violation, and recommended the proposed public reprimand. The board adopted the findings of misconduct and recommended sanction. … Sanction {¶ 5} In Columbus Bar Assn. v.

Lovell v. Levin

114 Ohio St. 3d 1418 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2007

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this ease shall be consolidated with 2007-0580, Caldwell v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-H-548, 2007-0584, Vestfall v. … Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, *1419 No. 2006-T-1054, 2007-0586, Huelsman v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-R-549, and 2007-0589, Lovell v. Levin, Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-A-781, for oral argument.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Kelleher

102 Ohio St. 3d 105 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 28, 2004

The board recommended that respondent receive a one-year suspension from the practice of law with six months stayed. We adopt the sanction recommended by the board. … Toledo Bar Assn. v. Cook, 97 Ohio St.3d 225 , 2002-Ohio-5787 , 778 N.E.2d 40 .

Kirkhart v. Keiper

101 Ohio St. 3d 377 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 14, 2004

Brown v. Osier (Me.1993), 628 A.2d 125, 128-129 . As stated by the court in Lamb v. … The underlying rationale is that “ ‘a party cannot escape the rule of res judicata through expansive pleading.’ ” Brown v. Osier, 628 A.2d at 128 , quoting Cohen v.

Gano v. Fisk

43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

Needles v. Needles, 7 Ohio St. 433 ; Crane v. Doty, 1 Ohio St. 283 . *470 This court held, in Phipps v. … Jones v. Brown, 84 N.

Hawkes Hospital v. Colley

2 Ohio St. 3d 40 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1982

Brown, J. … Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Beckwith & Associates, Inc. v. Kosydar

49 Ohio St. 2d 277 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1977

As this court noted in Cleveland v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1950), 153 Ohio St. 97, 99-100 , 91 N. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, J J., concur.-. O’Neill, C. J., and P. Brown, J., dissent.,

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Forg

97 Ohio St. 3d 495 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 18, 2002

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. FORG. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Forg, 2002-Ohio-6727.] … The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline found that respondent, E.

State v. Caltrider

43 Ohio St. 2d 157 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1975

Appellee correctly sets forth the law of the time in its reference to State v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., concurs in paragraphs two and three of the syllabus and in the judgment. P. Brown, J., concurs in the judgment only.

White v. City of Findlay

108 Ohio St. (N.S.) 475 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1923

Welsh v. State, 126 Ind., 71 , 25 N. E., 883 , 9 L. R. A., 664; Austin v. State, 10 Mo., 591 . … People v. Brown, 85 Mich., 119 , 48 N. W., 158 . The statute prohibiting the sale of liquor in a certain specific locality is not unconstitutional merely because its application is limited and not general. Howell v.