Case law

State ex rel. Waite v. Berry

11 Ohio St. 3d 53 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1984

Morris Co. v. … Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Koehler, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bowen

87 Ohio St. 3d 126 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1999

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. BOWEN. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bowen, 1999-Ohio-300.] … Respondent answered, and the matter was submitted to a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”). {¶ 2} The parties stipulated to testimony and exhibits, and the

Opalko v. Marymount Hospital, Inc.

9 Ohio St. 3d 63 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1984

In Schwan, supra, we found that the cases of Baird v. Loeffler (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 533 [ 23 O.O.3d 458 ], and Meros v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., dissent.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Juhola

2025 Ohio 5663 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 2025

V(21). … V(21).

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. McClain

95 Ohio St. 3d 488 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 5, 2002

Respondent did not answer, and the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”) referred the matter to Board Member W. … V(4)(G) (no attorney shall neglect or refuse to assist or testify in a disciplinary investigation or hearing).

Torpey v. State, Dept. of Rehabilitation & Correction

54 Ohio St. 2d 398 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1978

Moritz, v. Troop (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 90 ; R. C. 2743.03 (D). Civ. E. 38(A), which provides that “[t]he right to trial by jury shall be preserved to the parties inviolate,” is not inconsistent with R. … Brown, Acting C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Castle, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for O’Neill, C. J.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson

104 Ohio St. 3d 313 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2004

V(6)(F). … V(4)(G) and VI(1)(D), as found by the board. We further find that disbarment is appropriate.

Disciplinary Counsel v. VanBibber

2024 Ohio 1702 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 2024

V(17)(B)(3). {¶ 4} For the reasons that follow, we adopt the board’s findings of misconduct and recommended sanction. I. MISCONDUCT A. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.

56 Ohio St. 2d 191 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1978

In New Bremen v. Pub. Util. … Brown and Locher, JJ., concur. Leach, C. J., Herbert and P. Brown, JJ., concur in part.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wilson

89 Ohio St. 3d 243 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2000

Based on the results of that examination, the board certified the matter to the Supreme Court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(B) (suspension for mental illness). … V(4)(G).

Oney v. Needham

6 Ohio St. 2d 154 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 11, 1966

Rhoades v. City of Cleveland, 157 Ohio St. 107 . … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Paterson

98 Ohio St. 3d 446 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 16, 2003

The board adopted the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the panel, and further recommended that the costs of the proceedings be taxed to respondent. {¶ 5} We agree with the board that a public reprimand is appropriate … V(4)(G). See, e.g., Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Ross, 97 Ohio St.3d 224 , 2002-Ohio-5803 , 778 N.E.2d 39 , and Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Rubino (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 466 , 721 N.E.2d 986 .

Fyr-Fyter Co. v. Glander

150 Ohio St. 118 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1948

Leader v. Glander, Tax Commr., 149 Ohio St., 1 , 77 N. E. (2d), 69. … Appellants contend that that definition is too narrow; that “mining” so far as the statutes, supra, are concerned, was defined in Dye Goal Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 144 Ohio St., 233 , 58 N.

Disciplinary Counsel v. VanBibber

176 Ohio St. 3d 329 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 2024

V(17)(B)(3). {¶ 4} For the reasons that follow, we adopt the board’s findings of misconduct and recommended sanction. I. MISCONDUCT A. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Roope v. Industrial Commission

2 Ohio St. 3d 97 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1982

Gilbert v. Midland-Ross Corp. (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 267 [ 21 O.O.3d 168 ], paragraph one of the syllabus. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller

110 Ohio St. 3d 240 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 6, 2006

of which the board adopted. *241 Misconduct {¶ 3} In 2001, Ann Thompson, an 82-year-old woman, was injured in an automobile accident. … Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Diehl, 105 Ohio St.3d 469 , 2005-Ohio-2817 , 828 N.E.2d 1004 (restitution was made to client before the disciplinary process was completed); and Disciplinary Counsel v.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Battisti

2000 Ohio 194 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2000

[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Battisti, 90 Ohio St.3d 452, 2000-Ohio-194.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. BATTISTI. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Battisti (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 452.] … Respondent answered, and the matter was submitted to a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”).

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Jaffe

121 Ohio St. 3d 260 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 2009

V(4)(G). … V(4)(G) as admitted in the stipulations and the stipulated mitigating and aggravating factors, we accept the board’s recommendation of a six-month suspension. {¶ 8} Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law

State ex rel. Bry v. Kirk

42 Ohio St. 2d 454 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1975

Clink, v. Smith (1968), 16 Ohio St. 2d 1 . This court agrees with both contentions. The allegation of proper filing should prevent a dismissal inasmuch as a cause of action has been ‘ ‘ stated. ’ ’ Civ. R. 9 (C). … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Corrigan, J., dissents.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mathewson

113 Ohio St. 3d 365 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 2007

V(5) upon receiving notice that he had defaulted on a child-support order. … V(11)(B). Respondent did not answer, and relator moved for default pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(F).