Case law

Kirkhart v. Keiper

101 Ohio St. 3d 377 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 14, 2004

Brown v. Osier (Me.1993), 628 A.2d 125, 128-129 . As stated by the court in Lamb v. … The underlying rationale is that “ ‘a party cannot escape the rule of res judicata through expansive pleading.’ ” Brown v. Osier, 628 A.2d at 128 , quoting Cohen v.

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Melnick

107 Ohio St. 3d 240 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2005

Consistent with the panel’s report, the board recommended that respondent be publicly reprimanded. Respondent has not objected to the board’s report. … . {¶ 16} In Columbus Bar Assn. v. Dougherty, 105 Ohio St.3d 307 , 2005-Ohio-1825 , 825 N.E.2d 1094 , we publicly reprimanded a lawyer for avoiding the requirements of a notary jurat for her convenience.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace

89 Ohio St. 3d 113 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 2000

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WALLACE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace, 2000-Ohio-120.] … Respondent answered, and the matter was heard by a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“board”).

Disciplinary Counsel v. VanBibber

2024 Ohio 1702 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 2024

V(17)(B)(3). {¶ 4} For the reasons that follow, we adopt the board’s findings of misconduct and recommended sanction. I. MISCONDUCT A. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Reese v. Ohio State University Hospitals

6 Ohio St. 3d 162 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1983

See Schenkolewski v. Metroparks System (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 31 [ 21 O.O.3d 19 ], paragraph one of the syllabus. As this court indicated in McCord v. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent.

Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Burkholder

121 Ohio St. 3d 262 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 2009

. {¶ 2} On September 17, 2008, we found respondent in contempt of the order issued in Toledo Bar Assn. v. … Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman, 119 Ohio St.3d 330 , 2008-Ohio-3836 , 894 N.E.2d 31 , ¶ 1, fn. 1.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wilson

89 Ohio St. 3d 243 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2000

Based on the results of that examination, the board certified the matter to the Supreme Court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(B) (suspension for mental illness). … V(4)(G).

Oney v. Needham

6 Ohio St. 2d 154 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 11, 1966

Rhoades v. City of Cleveland, 157 Ohio St. 107 . … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Fyr-Fyter Co. v. Glander

150 Ohio St. 118 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1948

Leader v. Glander, Tax Commr., 149 Ohio St., 1 , 77 N. E. (2d), 69. … Appellants contend that that definition is too narrow; that “mining” so far as the statutes, supra, are concerned, was defined in Dye Goal Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 144 Ohio St., 233 , 58 N.

State ex rel. Durkin v. City Council of Youngstown

9 Ohio St. 3d 132 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1984

Foster, v. … Brown, Ford and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur in judgment only. Ford, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.

King v. Williams

5 Ohio St. 3d 137 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1983

Although Haverlack v. … Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurs in part.

In re Brunner

77 Ohio St. 3d 1499 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1996

V(5)(A)(2), the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court certified to the Supreme Court a certified copy of a judgment entry of a felony conviction against L. … V(5)(A)(3), it is ordered and decreed that L. Keith Brunner, a.k.a.

Disciplinary Counsel v. France

93 Ohio St. 3d 169 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 5, 2001

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FRANCE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. France, 2001-Ohio-1298.] … V(10).

State ex rel. Partee v. McMahon

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 243 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1963

In Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, 357 U. … In Lane, Warden, v. Brown, 372 U. S., 477, 484 , 9 L. Ed. (2d), 892, 897, it is said: “The present case falls clearly within the area staked out by the court’s decisions in Griffin, Burns, Smith, and Eskridge .

State ex rel. City of Dayton v. Kerns

49 Ohio St. 2d 295 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1977

Northern Ohio Telephone Co., v. Winter (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 6, 8 . … Brown, P. Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Celebrezze and Locher, JJ., concur in the judgment. In general, the power of a court to modify an injunction derives from “the continuing operation” of the court order.

State Ex Rel. Strawser v. Swing

130 Ohio St. 138 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1935

Opalko v. Marymount Hospital, Inc.

9 Ohio St. 3d 63 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1984

In Schwan, supra, we found that the cases of Baird v. Loeffler (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 533 [ 23 O.O.3d 458 ], and Meros v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., dissent.

Torpey v. State, Dept. of Rehabilitation & Correction

54 Ohio St. 2d 398 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1978

Moritz, v. Troop (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 90 ; R. C. 2743.03 (D). Civ. E. 38(A), which provides that “[t]he right to trial by jury shall be preserved to the parties inviolate,” is not inconsistent with R. … Brown, Acting C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Castle, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for O’Neill, C. J.

The Chapel v. Testa

129 Ohio St. 3d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 10, 2011

APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2007-V-2. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) in a real-property-tax-exemption … Ohio v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Juhola

2025 Ohio 5663 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 2025

V(21). … V(21).