Case law

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Lazzaro

106 Ohio St. 3d 379 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 19, 2005

Bar Assn. v. Buttacavoli, 96 Ohio St.3d 424 , 2002-Ohio-4743 , 775 N.E.2d 818 , ¶ 16. … Thus, while we agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(6), as found by the board, we find the sanction recommended by the panel and the board to be insufficient under the circumstances. {¶ 15} In Akron Bar Assn. v.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Gay

94 Ohio St. 3d 404 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 27, 2002

The board concluded that, contrary to relator’s argument, the board could not deny reinstating petitioner’s license to practice law under Section 525(a), Title 11, U.S.Code. … The board adopted the panel’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation.

Medina Cty Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach

83 Ohio St. 3d 224 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1998

V(4)(G). … V(4)(G).

Buckeye Union Insurance v. Price

39 Ohio St. 2d 95 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1974

Co. v. Steiner (1974), 37 Ohio St. 2d 113 ; Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutl. Ins. Co. (1973), 33 Ohio St. 2d 50 ; and Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Cas. Co. (1970), 22 Ohio St. 2d 161 . … Brown, JJ., concur. P. Brown, J., dissents. R.

State v. Hipkins

69 Ohio St. 2d 80 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1982

Armleder v. Lieberman (1877), 33 Ohio St. 77 .” State v. Kehn (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 11, 19 . IV. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. The trial judge gave the following instruction to the jury: “Intoxication is not an excuse for a crime.

City of East Liverpool v. Columbiana County Budget Commission

105 Ohio St. 3d 410 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 2005

Bd. of Edn. v. … Satow v.

Nobles v. Wolf

54 Ohio St. 3d 75 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1990

Co. v. Webb (1990), 54 Ohio St. 3d 61 , 562 N.E. 2d 132 . Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., concurs separately. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

State v. Sway

15 Ohio St. 3d 112 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

United States v. Moore (1975), 423 U.S. 122, 145 ; United States v. Brown (1948), 333 U.S. 18, 25-26 . R.C. 2925.03 demonstrates a clear legislative intent to prohibit the unlawful commerce of controlled substances. … Brown and C. Brown, JJ., dissent. United States v. Thompson (C.A.5, 1980), 624 F. 2d 740 ; United States v. Dunbar (C.A.5, 1980), 614 F. 2d 39 ; United States v. Millen (C.A.6, 1979), 594 F. 2d 1085 ; United States v.

Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

6 Ohio St. 3d 412 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1983

OCC made precisely the same contentions in Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. … Brown, Sweeney, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Locher, J., dissents.

State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)

2017 Ohio 2927 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 2017

See, e.g., State v. … See, e.g., Majoros v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Becker

140 Ohio St. 3d 299 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 3, 2014

Disciplinary Counsel v. … See Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. McClaran v. City of Ontario

119 Ohio St. 3d 105 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2008

Asti v. … Shine v.

Morgan v. City of Cincinnati

25 Ohio St. 3d 285 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1986

Brown, J. … Lynch, v. Taylor (1940), 136 Ohio St. 417 [ 16 O.O. 577 ]; State, ex rel. Baker, v. Wichert (1953), 159 Ohio St. 50 [ 50 O.O. 26 ]; State, ex rel. Brown, v.

State ex rel. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Orteca

63 Ohio St. 2d 295 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1980

Co. v. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. (1925), 112 Ohio St. 136, 152 ; Russell v. Fourth Natl. Bank (1921), 102 Ohio St. 248 , 269-70. … Brown, Sweeney and Holmes, JJ., concur. P. Brown, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. Locher, J., concurs in the judgment.

State ex rel. The Toledo Blade Co. v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

82 Ohio St. 3d 34 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 20, 1998

THE TOLEDO BLADE COMPANY v. BOARD OF HANCOCK COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. [Cite as State ex rel. The Toledo Blade Co. v. Hancock Cty. … Network v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Eisenberg

81 Ohio St. 3d 295 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1998

After review of the record, we adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. We said in Disciplinary Counsel v. … Fowerbaugh (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 187, 190 , 658 N.E.2d 237 , 240, and recently repeated in Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Knowlton (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 76 , 689 N.E.2d 538 , and Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Citizens for Responsible Green Govt. v. Green (Slip Opinion)

155 Ohio St. 3d 28 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2018

Green v. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency , 6th Cir. … Carrier v.

State v. Nichols

11 Ohio St. 3d 40 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1984

As we noted in State v. … Brown, J., dissents separately. Koehler, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

State ex rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski

111 Ohio St. 3d 353 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 2006

Mayer v. … See, e.g., State v. Brown (2000), 136 Ohio App.3d 816, 819-820 , 737 N.E.2d 1057 .

Disciplinary Counsel v. Goldberger (Slip Opinion)

2019 Ohio 4844 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 27, 2019

. {¶ 8} The board found that the consent-to-discipline agreement conforms to Gov.Bar R. V(16) and recommends that we adopt the agreement in its entirety. … In support of that recommendation, the board cited two cases in which this court has publicly reprimanded attorneys in similar circumstances. See, e.g., Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.