Case law

Bertolini v. Public Utilities Commission

37 Ohio St. 2d 107 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1974

Motor Transportation v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1939), 135 Ohio St. 145 ; Bruder v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 24 . Order affirmed. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. … Brown, JJ., concur. Appellant conceded in oral argument that he was not prejudiced or harmed in any way by the failure of the commission to serve him with a copy of the examiner’s report.

State ex rel. Phillips v. Industrial Commission

5 Ohio St. 3d 202 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1983

Allied Wheel Products, Inc., v. Indus. Comm. (1956), 166 Ohio St. 47 [ 1 O.O.2d 190 ]. Mandamus is available only upon a showing of abuse of discretion. State, ex rel. Haines, v. Indus. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Van Aken v. Duffy

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 105 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1964

Belator argues that the form of petition which he used was prescribed by the Secretary of State of Ohio and given to him by the Board of Elections. … Kroeger, v. Leonard et al., Board of Elections of Summit County, 151 Ohio St., 197 . Writ denied. Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

State v. Gates

131 Ohio St. 3d 372 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 27, 2012

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Smith, 131 Ohio St.3d 297 , 2012-Ohio-781 , 964 N.E.2d 423 . … O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

College Preparatory School for Girls v. Evatt

144 Ohio St. 408 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1945

It was held in paragraph two of the syllabus in the case of Ursuline Academy of Cleveland v. Board of Tax Appeals, 141 Ohio St., 563 , 49 N. … Ursuline Academy of Cleveland v. Board of Tax Appeals, supra, and cases there cited.

State ex rel. Bunch v. Industrial Commission

62 Ohio St. 2d 423 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1980

Brown, J. At issue in the instant cause is a statutory provision formerly contained within R. C. 4123.56. … Gassmann, v. Indus.

Village of Pleasant City v. Division of Reclamation

67 Ohio St. 3d 312 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1993

Accordingly, we find that the Board’s order is contrary to law and the specific language of R.C. 1513.073(A)(2)(c), in that the Board’s order does not protect future uses. *317 “In so deciding, we adopt Board’s fact findings … Ohio Gas Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1988), 39 Ohio St.3d 295, 299 , 530 N.E.2d 875, 879 .

City of Cincinnati v. Kelley

47 Ohio St. 2d 94 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1976

See, e. g., State v. Wilgus (1945), 31 Ohio Ops. 443 ; State v. Ezoto (1961), 116 Ohio App. 1 , 186 N; E. 2d 206; State v. Purcell (Del. Super. 1975), 336 A. 2d 223 ; Newman v. Stinson (Ky. 1972), 489 S. … Brown, JJ., concur. ■Celebrezze, J., concurs in the judgment only. • Corrigan, and W. Brown, JJ., dissent.

State ex rel. Marchiano v. School Employees Retirement System

121 Ohio St. 3d 139 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 3, 2009

We have recognized that “[a]s long as there is sufficient evidence to support [a] retirement-system board’s decisions, we will not disturb them.” State ex rel. Grein v. … Wright v.

Stebbins v. Rhodes

56 Ohio St. 2d 239 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1978

American Power & Light Co. v. S. E. C. (1946), 329 U. S. 90 ; State, ex rel. Hoel, v. Brown (1922), 105 Ohio St. 479, 485 , 138 N. E. 230 ; State, ex rel. Allstate Ins. Co., v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. R.

Hughes v. Calabrese

95 Ohio St. 3d 334 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 22, 2002

Landis v. Morrow Cty. … Kopchak v.

State v. Wallace

43 Ohio St. 2d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1975

Brown, J. In State v. Hughes (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 208 , this court held that App. R. 4(B) did not grant the state an appeal as of right in criminal cases. … Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., concurs in the syllabus, but dissents from the judgment.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wilson

89 Ohio St. 3d 243 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2000

Based on the results of that examination, the board certified the matter to the Supreme Court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(B) (suspension for mental illness). … V(4)(G).

Simmons v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

81 Ohio St. 3d 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1998

SIMMONS, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Simmons v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1998-Ohio-443.] … ’s valuation, without the board of revision’s presenting any evidence. {¶ 14} Simmons cites Zazworsky v.

State v. Pembaur

9 Ohio St. 3d 136 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1984

The crux of this case is the applicability of Columbus v. Fraley (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 173 [ 70 O.O.2d 335 ]. … Brown, JJ., concur. Locher, J., concurs in judgment only. W. Brown, J., dissents. Reilly, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for J. P. Celebrezze, J.

Fyr-Fyter Co. v. Glander

150 Ohio St. 118 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1948

Leader v. Glander, Tax Commr., 149 Ohio St., 1 , 77 N. E. (2d), 69. … Appellants contend that that definition is too narrow; that “mining” so far as the statutes, supra, are concerned, was defined in Dye Goal Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 144 Ohio St., 233 , 58 N.

State v. Hipkins

69 Ohio St. 2d 80 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1982

Armleder v. Lieberman (1877), 33 Ohio St. 77 .” State v. Kehn (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 11, 19 . IV. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. The trial judge gave the following instruction to the jury: “Intoxication is not an excuse for a crime.

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Adjustment Serv. Corp.

89 Ohio St. 3d 385 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 9, 2000

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. ADJUSTMENT SERVICE CORPORATION, D.B.A. CINCINNATI CREDIT COUNSELING. CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. FUQUA. CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. … Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty.

Ohio Children's Society, Inc. v. Porterfield

26 Ohio St. 2d 30 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1971

Lutheran Book Shop v. Bowers (1955), 164 Ohio St. 359 , 362. Construing R. C. 5739.02(B) (12), as we must, we cannot say that the board’s decision was unreasonable or unlawful. Appellant’s executive director, Mrs. … Rita’s Home, v. Board of Review, supra, under R. C. 4141.01(B) (2) (h), perhaps a different result might prevail. This is not such a case. R.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Wineman

121 Ohio St. 3d 614 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 6, 2009

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wineman, 121 Ohio St.3d 614, 2009-Ohio-2005.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WINEMAN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … Bar Assn. v. Buttacavoli, 96 Ohio St.3d 424, 2002-Ohio-4743, 775 N.E.2d 818 ¶ 16.