Case law

Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson

122 Ohio St. 3d 293 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 2009

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson, 122 Ohio St.3d 293, 2009-Ohio-3501.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. JOHNSON. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … . {¶ 10} The board relied on Toledo Bar Assn. v. Hickman, 107 Ohio St.3d 296, 2005-Ohio-6513, 839 N.E.2d 24; Disciplinary Counsel v.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Curry

79 Ohio St. 3d 181 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1997

V(4)(G) *185 requires an attorney to assist in an investigation of a complaint. … the board.

State v. Pembaur

9 Ohio St. 3d 136 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1984

The crux of this case is the applicability of Columbus v. Fraley (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 173 [ 70 O.O.2d 335 ]. … Brown, JJ., concur. Locher, J., concurs in judgment only. W. Brown, J., dissents. Reilly, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for J. P. Celebrezze, J.

Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Kocak

121 Ohio St. 3d 396 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2009

Bar Assn. v. Kocak, 121 Ohio St.3d 396, 2009-Ohio-1430.] LORAIN COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. KOCAK. [Cite as Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kocak, 121 Ohio St.3d 396, 2009-Ohio-1430.] … Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

Morgan v. City of Cincinnati

25 Ohio St. 3d 285 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1986

Brown, J. … Lynch, v. Taylor (1940), 136 Ohio St. 417 [ 16 O.O. 577 ]; State, ex rel. Baker, v. Wichert (1953), 159 Ohio St. 50 [ 50 O.O. 26 ]; State, ex rel. Brown, v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Meyer

142 Ohio St. 3d 448 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 19, 2015

V(6a)(C), we granted Meyer’s motion for leave to answer and remanded the case to the board on August 26, 2013. Disciplinary Counsel v. Meyer, 136 Ohio St.3d 1465 , 2013-Ohio-3661 , 992 N.E.2d 1151 . … Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. .

State ex rel. Catlino v. Clerk of Common Pleas Court of Cuyahoga County

9 Ohio St. 2d 101 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1967

Vitoratos, v. Yacobucci, Clerk of Courts, 173 Ohio St. 462 ; State, ex rel. Baines, v. Parrino, Judge, 174 Ohio St. 531 ; and State, ex rel. Partee, v. McMahon, Judge, 175 Ohio St. 243 . … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Niles Bank Co. v. Evatt

145 Ohio St. 179 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1945

This court had occasion to consider Section 1464-3, General Code, in the case of Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 142 Ohio St., 254, 51 . N. E. (2d), 718. … The appellant however contends that the cases of Leimbach et al., Trustees, v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 141 Ohio St., 191 , 46 N. E. (2d), 859, and Willys-Overland Motors, Inc., v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 141 Ohio St., 402 , 48 N.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Mishler

118 Ohio St. 3d 109 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2008

Bar Assn. v. … Toledo Bar Assn. v. Kramer (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 321, 323 , 731 N.E.2d 643 . Disciplinary Counsel v.

State v. Waller

143 Ohio St. 409 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1944

See, also, Katz v. Higson, 113 Conn., 776 , 155 A., 507 ; People v. Russell, 74 Cal., 578 , 16 P., 395 . … Thompson Scenic Ry. v. McCabe, 211 Mich., 133 , 178 N. W., 662 ; Village of Durand v. Love, 254 Mich., 538 , 236 N. W., 855 ; City of Newport v. Newport National Bank, 148 Ky., 213 , 146 S. W., 377 ; Wolfe v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire

144 Ohio St. 3d 1279 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 2015

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2015-Ohio-5058.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. SQUIRE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(10)(F), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.1 The board filed its final report in this court on October 6, 2015, recommending that respondent’s

Disciplinary Counsel v. Young

113 Ohio St. 3d 36 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 21, 2007

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.

Bank One of Milford, N.A. v. Bardes

25 Ohio St. 3d 296 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1986

In Marital Trust of Casto v. … Brown and Wright, JJ., concur. Holmes and Wright, JJ., concur separately. Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.

City of Cincinnati v. Sand

43 Ohio St. 2d 79 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1975

The sixth paragraph of the syllabus of Mentor v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Snow v. Courtright

38 Ohio St. 2d 305 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1974

Barber v. Krieg (1961), 172 Ohio St. 433 , 435, 178 N. E. 2d 170 ; Marsh v. Koons (1908), 78 Ohio St. 68 , 84 N. E. 599 . … Brown, JJ., concur. W. Brown, J., concurs in paragraph one of the syllabus and in the judgment. Stern, J., dissents.

Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Zubaidah (Slip Opinion)

140 Ohio St. 3d 495 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 25, 2014

We will defer to the panel’s determination of the credibility of testimony when “the record does not weigh heavily against the findings of the panel, as adopted by the board.” Disciplinary Counsel v. … See also People v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling

114 Ohio St. 3d 474 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 29, 2007

V(11)(B). Respondent did not answer, and relator moved for default under Gov.Bar R. V(6)(F). … V(4)(G). Sanction {¶ 9} Relator recommended that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. The master commissioner and the board agreed.

Disciplinary Counsel v. VanBibber

2024 Ohio 1702 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 2024

V(17)(B)(3). {¶ 4} For the reasons that follow, we adopt the board’s findings of misconduct and recommended sanction. I. MISCONDUCT A. … Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Vickers v. Summit County Council

97 Ohio St. 3d 204 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 21, 2002

Commt. for the Charter Amendment Petition v. … Stutzman v. Madison Cty.

Bertolini v. Public Utilities Commission

37 Ohio St. 2d 107 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1974

Motor Transportation v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1939), 135 Ohio St. 145 ; Bruder v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 24 . Order affirmed. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. … Brown, JJ., concur. Appellant conceded in oral argument that he was not prejudiced or harmed in any way by the failure of the commission to serve him with a copy of the examiner’s report.