Case law

State ex rel. Stevens v. Geauga Cty. Bd. of Elections

90 Ohio St. 3d 223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2000

STEVENS v. GEAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. [Cite as State ex rel. Stevens v. Geauga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2000-Ohio-66.] … Herman v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Shimko (Slip Opinion)

2019 Ohio 2881 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2019

And because the board’s deliberations are confidential, Shimko can only speculate as to what the board did or did not review. See Gov.Bar R. V(8)(B). … V(8), all grievances remain confidential until a certified complaint is filed with the board.

State ex rel. Committee for Proposed Ordinance to Repeal Ordinance No. 146-02 v. City of Lakewood

100 Ohio St. 3d 252 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 29, 2003

Sharpe v. … Ohio Roundtable, Inc. v.

State ex rel. Stanforth v. Washington Distributors, Inc.

11 Ohio St. 3d 236 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1984

Hutton, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 9, 13 [ 58 O.O.2d 66 ]. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith

104 Ohio St. 3d 50 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 24, 2004

V(11)(B). {¶ 2} Respondent did not answer the amended complaint, and relator moved for default pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(F). … Bar Assn. v.

State v. Slatter

66 Ohio St. 2d 452 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1981

Brown, J. Appellant asserts, as its sole proposition of law, that “R. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. DeMora v. LaRose (Slip Opinion)

171 Ohio St. 3d 242 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 24, 2022

West v. … V.

Cinnamon Lake Utility Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

42 Ohio St. 2d 259 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 1975

Cookson Pottery v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1954), 161 Ohio St. 498 . R. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Hales

120 Ohio St. 3d 340 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 4, 2008

The board, in adopting the panel’s report, expressed a particular desire to hold respondent accountable despite the discharge in bankruptcy of his indebtedness to Oehlers, citing Hippard v. … See also People v. Huntzinger (Colo.1998), 967 P.2d 160 , and In re Bradley (C.A.5, 1993), 989 F.2d 802 , 804. {¶ 25} But as the board and panel acknowledged, Ohio has taken the opposing view. In Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

City of Niles v. Howard

12 Ohio St. 3d 162 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1984

In Toledo v. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J., dissents. O’Neill, J., of the Seventh Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J. “513.03 DRUG ABUSE: CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE POSSESSION OR USE.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson

107 Ohio St. 3d 182 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 2005

The board found that respondent had thereby violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and 1-102(A)(5) and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). … We thus accept the panel’s and the board’s evidentiary assessments and find that respondent committed the cited violations of the Disciplinary Rules and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G) and V(8)(E).

State Ex Rel. Kobelt v. Baker

137 Ohio St. 337 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1940

At various times prior to November 15, 1936, such board of trustees tentatively formulated and accepted rules and by-laws for the government of both the board and relief fund. … White, Gdn., v. Cleveland, 135 Ohio St., 13, 15 , 18 N. E. (2d), 807. Both sides have contended that the case of State, *339 ex rel. White, Gdn., v. Cleveland, supra, announces the law here applicable.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Weithman

143 Ohio St. 3d 84 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 12, 2015

V(9), for comparable conduct in Disciplinary Counsel v. McCormack, 133 Ohio St.3d 192 , 2012-Ohio-4309 , 977 N.E.2d 598 . {¶ 24} The board has adopted the panel’s findings of facts and conclusions of law. … Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. .

Walters v. First National Bank

69 Ohio St. 2d 677 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1982

Stone v. Davis (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 74 . … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Civ.

In re Becker

39 Ohio St. 2d 84 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1974

This court finds the rationale of People v. Jiles (1969), 43 Ill. 2d 145, 150 , 251 N. … Brown, JJ., concur. O’Neill, C. J., Stern and W. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Millonig

84 Ohio St. 3d 403 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1999

We consequently distinguish Disciplinary Counsel v. … We also agree with the board regarding the appropriate sanction. Unlike Disciplinary Counsel v.

State v. Craycraft

128 Ohio St. 3d 337 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2010

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. … Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Perdue v. Court of Common Pleas

61 Ohio St. 2d 34 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1980

Catlino, v. Clerk of Courts (1967), 9 Ohio St. 2d 101 . Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ of procedendo is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Cox v. Payne

117 Ohio St. 317 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1927

Minor v. Curtis, 101 *322 Ohio St., 383, 130 N. E.. 18, and 101 Ohio St.. 533, 130 N. … Bloker v. Gabel, 113 Ohio St., 398 , 149 N. E., 403 , it is quite clear that there was an amendment to an original nominating petition, and that the amendment was filed after the 60-day period began to run.

State Ex Rel. Shisler v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

122 Ohio St. 3d 148 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 4, 2009

signed by the retirant or recipient and filed with the board.” … The PERS board did not receive that election until after his death. {¶ 23} This result is also supported by precedent. In State ex rel. Solomon v.