Case law

Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.

54 Ohio St. 2d 286 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 1978

Time, Inc., v. Hill, supra [ 385 U. S. 374 (1967)]. … Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, W. Brown and Locher, JJ., concur in the judgment.

State ex rel. Bowman v. Columbiana Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

77 Ohio St. 3d 398 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1997

BOWMAN ET AL. v. COLUMBIANA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Bowman v. Columbiana Cty. … Seikbert v.

State v. Leuin

11 Ohio St. 3d 172 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1984

See, e.g., State v. Gardner (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 14, 19 [ 13 O.O.3d 8 ]. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents. The following example appears in McCormick, Evidence (2d Ed. Cleary Ed. 1972) 97-98, Section 47.

Sustin v. Fee

69 Ohio St. 2d 143 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1982

See Scot Lad Foods v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., and C. Brown, J., dissent.

State ex rel. Anderson v. Industrial Commission

9 Ohio St. 3d 170 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1984

Westchester Estates, Inc., v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St. 3d 42 [ 15 O.O.3d 53 ], paragraph one of the syllabus. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., dissent.

State v. Render

43 Ohio St. 2d 17 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1975

Ford v. Ideal Aluminum (1966), 7 Ohio St. 2d 9 ; Crow v. Brite Metal Treating (1967), 9 Ohio St. 2d 63 . … Brown, and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Cinnamon Lake Utility Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

42 Ohio St. 2d 259 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 1975

Cookson Pottery v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1954), 161 Ohio St. 498 . R. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gerren

110 Ohio St. 3d 297 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2006

These trials, mentioned first in Dayton Bar Assn. v. … In Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw

110 Ohio St. 3d 122 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 9, 2006

Bar Assn. v. … V(9).

State ex rel. Stevens v. Geauga Cty. Bd. of Elections

90 Ohio St. 3d 223 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2000

STEVENS v. GEAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. [Cite as State ex rel. Stevens v. Geauga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2000-Ohio-66.] … Herman v.

State ex rel. Montrie Nursing Home, Inc. v. Aggrey

63 Ohio St. 2d 121 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1980

Dean, v. Huddle (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 234 ; Monaghan v. Richley (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 190 . … Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Locher, J., concurs in the judgment. *128 P. Brown and Holmes, JJ., dissent.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Shimko (Slip Opinion)

2019 Ohio 2881 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2019

And because the board’s deliberations are confidential, Shimko can only speculate as to what the board did or did not review. See Gov.Bar R. V(8)(B). … V(8), all grievances remain confidential until a certified complaint is filed with the board.

State v. Frazier

58 Ohio St. 2d 253 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1979

(See Boyer v. Maxwell (1963), 175 Ohio St. 318 , at page 319, for a similar analysis in the context of breaking and entering.) … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. This court has considered the substantive content of R. C. 2941.25 in two prior decisions: State v. Donald (1979), 67 Ohio St. 2d 73 , and Maumee v.

Toledo Bar Association v. Harvey

141 Ohio St. 3d 346 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 4, 2014

V(6)(G), which permits a unanimous panel of the board to order the dismissal of a count without referring it to the board or this court for review, requires the panel to provide notice to counsel of record and other interested … Instead, the panel certified its findings of fact and recommendations to the board in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(6)(H) and (I). Because the board did not order dismissal and provide the notices required by Gov.Bar R.

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. Schiff

139 Ohio St. 3d 456 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 18, 2014

Applicable Precedent {¶ 16} The board cites three cases in support of its recommended sanction. In Disciplinary Counsel v. … Id. at ¶ 16. {¶ 17} In Toledo Bar Assn. v.

Lake Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. Disabilities v. Professional Assn. for the Teaching of the Mentally Retarded.

71 Ohio St. 3d 15 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1994

LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF MENTAL RETARDATION & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ET AL., APPELLEES, v. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE TEACHING OF THE MENTALLY RETARDED ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Lake Cty. … See Lynch v. Halcomb (1984), 16 Ohio App.3d 223, 16 OBR 238, 475 N.E.2d 181. {¶ 13} In seeking to modify the arbitrator's opinion, the board relies on R.C. 2711.11(C).

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Wagner

113 Ohio St. 3d 158 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 4, 2007

Also, in Columbus Bar Assn. v. … V(4)(G), as found by the master commissioner and the board and that an indefinite suspension is the appropriate sanction.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Croushore

108 Ohio St. 3d 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2006

Disciplinary Counsel v. O’Neill, 103 Ohio St.3d 204 , 2004-Ohio-4704 , 815 N.E.2d 286, at ¶ 53 . … V(6)(B)(4). During the period of probation, respondent’s IOLTA account records must be monitored by the monitoring attorney appointed by relator in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9). {¶ 12} Costs are taxed to respondent.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Ramos

119 Ohio St. 3d 36 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 2008

As an aggravating factor, the board implied that Sweet’s advanced age made him a vulnerable client. BCGD Proc.Reg. 10(B)(1)(h). {¶ 9} We accept the board’s recommendation. … V(9). If respondent *38 fails to comply with the conditions of the stay and probation, the stay will be lifted, and he will serve the entire six-month suspension. Jones Day, Robert S. Faxon, and Justin M.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Engler

110 Ohio St. 3d 138 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 9, 2006

Disciplinary Counsel v. Moore, 101 Ohio St.3d 261 , 2004-Ohio-734 , 804 N.E.2d 423 , citing Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietro (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 391 , 643 N.E.2d 1145 ; Disciplinary Counsel v. … Paxton (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 163 , 610 N.E.2d 979 ; Disciplinary Counsel v. Ressing (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 265 , 559 N.E.2d 1359 .