Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.29s

  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Blakeslee

    174 Ohio St. 3d 188 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2023

    V(13)(C)(1). … Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bucciere

    121 Ohio St. 3d 274 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 19, 2009

    [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bucciere, 121 Ohio St.3d 274, 2009-Ohio-1156.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. BUCCIERE. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … A panel appointed by the board considered the case upon the parties’ consent-to-discipline agreement, filed pursuant to Section 11 of the Rules and Regulations Governing Procedure on Complaints and Hearings Before the Board

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kiel v. Green Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

    69 Ohio St. 3d 149 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1994

    KIEL, APPELLANT, v. GREEN LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Kiel v. Green Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 1994-Ohio-21.] … See Farmer v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Majoros v. Collins

    64 Ohio St. 3d 442 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1992

    Wynn v. Baker (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 464 , 575 N.E.2d 208 ; Blackburn v. Jago (1988), 39. Ohio St.3d 139, 529 N.E.2d 929 ; Walker v. Maxwell (1965), 1 Ohio St.2d 136 , 30 O.O.2d 487 , 205 N.E.2d 394 . Judgment affirmed. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Warren County Bar Association v. Ernst.

    154 Ohio St. 3d 131 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 27, 2018

    V(13)(B) and (C)(1) through (5). {¶ 9} The board recommends that we adopt the parties’ consent-to- discipline agreement and publicly reprimand Ernst for his misconduct. … In support of that recommendation, the board notes that we have imposed public reprimands for similar misconduct in Akron Bar Assn. v. Harsey, 142 Ohio St.3d 97, 2015- Ohio-965, 28 N.E.3d 86; Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Amoco Oil Co. v. Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Comp. Bd.

    2000 Ohio 224 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 30, 2000

    AMOCO OIL COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. PETROLEUM UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK RELEASE COMPENSATION BOARD, APPELLANT. R&R SERVICE, APPELLANT, v. … DeBoe v. Indus.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Brand (Slip Opinion)

    164 Ohio St. 3d 542 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 29, 2021

    See Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … See Columbus Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Craycraft

    128 Ohio St. 3d 337 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2010

    {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. … Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Gabriel v. Youngstown

    75 Ohio St. 3d 618 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1996

    See, e.g., Joyce v. Gen. … Fenwick v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ohio-American Water Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

    68 Ohio St. 2d 104 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1981

    Welfare Rights Org. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1978), 55 Ohio St. 2d 1, at 6 ; and Akron v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1978), 55 Ohio St. 2d 155 . … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Nance

    119 Ohio St. 3d 55 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 9, 2008

    The board adopted the panel’s findings and recommendation. … Accepting the panel’s report, the board recommended this sanction as consistent with Columbus Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Powers

    119 Ohio St. 3d 473 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 25, 2008

    The board adopted the panel’s findings of misconduct and recommendation. {¶ 4} Relator has objected to the board’s report, arguing in the main that the board unduly minimized the gravity of respondent’s convictions and the … In Disciplinary Counsel v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Corron v. Wisner

    25 Ohio St. 2d 160 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1971

    Pressley, v. Indus. … C. 5717.01 provides for an appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals from the decision of the Board of Eevision.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.

    54 Ohio St. 2d 286 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 1978

    Time, Inc., v. Hill, supra [ 385 U. S. 374 (1967)]. … Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, W. Brown and Locher, JJ., concur in the judgment.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Crawford v. Halkovics

    1 Ohio St. 3d 184 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1982

    See, also, Schrader v. George (1931), 12 Ohio Law Abs. 49 ; McLaughlin v. Campbell (1930), 9 Ohio Law Abs. 240 ; McMahon v. Young (1971), 442 Pa. 484 , 276 A. 2d 534 ; Brown v. … Brown, Sweeney, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., Locher and C. Brown, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Dublin School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Limbach

    69 Ohio St. 3d 255 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 11, 1994

    Soc. for Metals v. … Bowling Congress, Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Rogers

    116 Ohio St. 3d 99 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 24, 2007

    Dayton Bar Assn. v. Rogers (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 283 , 643 N.E.2d 539 . … Ambrose, for respondent. {¶ 19} The sanction recommended by the board is consistent with our decisions in similar cases. See, e.g., Cleveland Bar Assn. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Griffin

    127 Ohio St. 3d 266 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2010

    . {¶2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v. Ketterer, 126 Ohio St.3d 448 , 2010-Ohio-3831 , 935 N.E.2d 9 . … Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Geauga County Bar Association v. Bond

    146 Ohio St. 3d 97 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 20, 2016

    Bar Assn. v. … V(13)(C)(1), (4), and (5).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

    4 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1983

    In Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. … Brown, Sweeney, Mahoney, Holmes, C. Brown and Putman, JJ., concur. Mahoney, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J. Putman, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting by assignment.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.