Case law

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Boyd

112 Ohio St. 3d 331 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 2006

Bar Assn. v. Harpman (1993), 62 Ohio Misc.2d 573 , 575, 608 N.E.2d 872 . {¶ 10} Gov.Bar R. … Bar Assn. v. Clapp (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 276, 278 , 703 N.E.2d 771 ; Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Coats, 98 Ohio St.3d 413 , 2003-Ohio-1496 , 786 N.E.2d 449, ¶ 3 .

Disciplinary Counsel v. Goodall

103 Ohio St. 3d 501 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 3, 2004

V(5)(A)(3) suspension. … Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Lewis v. Rolston

115 Ohio St. 3d 293 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 1, 2007

Shaw v. … Moreover, the village council has no duty under R.C. 731.28 to transmit or certify initiative petitions to the board of elections. We cannot create the legal duty enforceable in mandamus. State ex rel. Boccuzzi v.

Muskingum County Certified Grievance Committee v. Greenberger

108 Ohio St. 3d 258 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 8, 2006

Count V — Guenther {¶ 20} In 2002, Harry O. Guenther asked respondent to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy on his behalf and paid him a total of $575 for this service. … V(10)(C) *264 through (G), rather than through the less rigorous procedure for reinstatement set forth in Gov.Bar R. V (10)(A). Costs are taxed to respondent. Stubbins, Watson & Erhard Co., L.P.A., and Brent A.

Lake Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. Disabilities v. Professional Assn. for the Teaching of the Mentally Retarded.

71 Ohio St. 3d 15 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1994

LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF MENTAL RETARDATION & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ET AL., APPELLEES, v. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE TEACHING OF THE MENTALLY RETARDED ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Lake Cty. … See Lynch v. Halcomb (1984), 16 Ohio App.3d 223, 16 OBR 238, 475 N.E.2d 181. {¶ 13} In seeking to modify the arbitrator's opinion, the board relies on R.C. 2711.11(C).

Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.

15 Ohio St. 3d 75 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

King v. K. R. Wilson Co. (1983), 8 Ohio St. 3d 9 . Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., and W. … Brown, J., concur in judgment only.

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Shenise

143 Ohio St. 3d 134 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 29, 2015

Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. . … V(13), 140 Ohio St.3d CXXIY.

Ball v. Maxwell

1 Ohio St. 2d 77 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1965

Page v. Green, Supt., 174 Ohio St. 178 ; Neal v. Maxwell, Warden, 176 Ohio St. 206 ; and Lowther v. Maxwell, Warden, 175 Ohio St. 39 . Petitioner remanded to custody. Taft, C. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

C. A. King & Co. v. Horton

116 Ohio St. 205 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1927

Counsel have cited the recent case of Board of Trade v. … In the opinion the court discussed Hill, Jr., v. Wallace, supra, and Board of Trade of City of Chicago v.

Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision

74 Ohio St. 3d 639 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1996

CINCINNATI SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. … Cincinnati v. Hamilton Cty.

Columbus Ctiy Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

2017 Ohio 2734 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 11, 2017

SLIP OPINION NO. 2017-OHIO-2734 COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE, v. … See Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark Cty.

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Jones

123 Ohio St. 3d 285 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 1, 2009

Bar Assn. v. Jones, 123 Ohio St.3d 285, 2009-Ohio-5029.] MAHONING COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. JONES. [Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. … objected to the board report.

County of Cuyahoga v. Budget Commission

152 Ohio St. 351 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1949

Board of Education of Cleveland Heights v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 136 Ohio St., 283 , 25 N. E. (2d), 453. … Board of Education of Cleveland v. City of Shaker Heights, 137 Ohio St., 597 , 32 N. E. (2d), 11.

Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission

4 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1983

In Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. … Brown, Sweeney, Mahoney, Holmes, C. Brown and Putman, JJ., concur. Mahoney, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J. Putman, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting by assignment.

C.I.A. Properties v. Cuyahoga Cty. Aud.

89 Ohio St. 3d 363 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 26, 2000

See Hewlett Packard Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. … In Elkem Metals Co., L.P. v. Washington Cty.

Hara v. Montgomery County Joint Vocational School District

75 Ohio St. 3d 60 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1996

Tate v. Westerville City Bd. of Edn. (1983), 4 Ohio St.3d 206 , 4 OBR 524, 448 N.E.2d 144 , syllabus. … Polo v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 143 , 656 N.E.2d 1277 ; State ex rel. Meyers v. Columbus (1995), 71 Ohio St.3d 603 , 646 N.E.2d 173 ; State ex rel. Cater v. N.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Sharp Estate Services, Inc.

107 Ohio St. 3d 219 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2005

See Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v. Hanna (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 58, 61 , 684 N.E.2d 329 . {¶ 14} We further order respondents to comply with the board’s order to disclose the names of their Ohio customers.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mollica

2025 Ohio 5372 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 3, 2025

V(13)(B)(3). … Disciplinary Counsel v. Markijohn, 2003-Ohio-4129, ¶ 8, citing Dayton Bar Assn. v. Kinney, 2000-Ohio-445.

Huber Hts. Circuit Courts, Ltd. v. Carne

74 Ohio St. 3d 306 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1996

D & F INVESTMENTS, APPELLANT, v. CARNE, TREASURER, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Huber Hts. Circuit Courts, Ltd. v. Carne, 1996-Ohio-157.] … Assoc. v. Hamilton Cty.

Featzka v. Millcraft Paper Co.

62 Ohio St. 2d 245 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 1980

As this court stated in the first paragraph of the syllabus in Henry v. Central Natl. … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. W. Brown and Holmes, JJ., dissent.