Case law

Miller v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.

64 Ohio St. 2d 265 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1980

Bradshaw v. Baylor Univ. (Tex. Comm. App. 1935), 126 Tex. 99, 104 , 84 S.W. 2d 703 . Accord McMullen v. Coleman (Tex. Civ. App. 1940), 135 S.W. 2d 776, 778 ; McMillen v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., concur. See, McCrary, supra, at 350 ; Schering Corp., supra, at 519 ; and Lubbock Mfg. Co. v. Perez (Tex. Civ. App. 1979), 591 S.W. 2d 907, 923-924 .

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Carter

115 Ohio St. 3d 18 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 29, 2007

. {¶ 17} The board’s recommended sanction is similar to those that we have imposed in other cases. See, e.g., Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Stidham

87 Ohio St. 3d 455 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 5, 2000

Respondent principally takes issue with two aspects of the board’s report, and so objects to the board’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended sanction. … V(6)(J); Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Reid (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 327 , 708 N.E.2d 193 , paragraph two of the syllabus. Respondent argues that relator did not fully meet its standard of proof.

Akron Bar Assn. v. McNerney

122 Ohio St. 3d 40 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 2009

[Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. McNerney, 122 Ohio St.3d 40, 2009-Ohio-2374.] AKRON BAR ASSOCIATION v. MCNERNEY. [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. McNerney, 122 Ohio St.3d 40, 2009-Ohio-2374.] … Disciplinary Counsel v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cannata and Phillips (Slip Opinion)

2016 Ohio 3027 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 18, 2016

V(13)(C)(2). {¶ 30} The board considered a number of cases in which we sanctioned attorneys for similar rule violations. … Bar Assn. v.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. King

106 Ohio St. 3d 102 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 17, 2005

Count V {¶ 8} As to Count V, the panel and board found that respondent had failed to cooperate in relator’s investigation of Count IV, a violation of Gov.Bar R. … V(4)(G) and VI(1)(D), as found by the board. Moreover, because we ordinarily impose an indefinite suspension for neglect and the failure to cooperate, Disciplinary Counsel v.

Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Smith

45 Ohio St. 2d 66 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1976

Co. v. Sterner (1974), 37 Ohio St. 2d 113 , 308 N. E. 2d 460 ; Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutl. Ins. Co. (1973), 33 Ohio St. 2d 50 , 294 N. E. 2d 665 ; and Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Cas. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Lukey

110 Ohio St. 3d 128 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 9, 2006

Disciplinary Counsel v. Greene (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 13, 16-17 , 655 N.E.2d 1299 . … V(9). During the probation, respondent shall allow a monitoring attorney, appointed by relator, to oversee his practice and counsel him on proper case preparation and client communication.

State ex rel. Vickers v. Summit Cty. Council

97 Ohio St. 3d 204 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 21, 2002

VICKERS ET AL. v. SUMMIT COUNTY COUNCIL ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Vickers v. Summit Cty. Council, 2002-Ohio-5583.] … Stutzman v. Madison Cty.

Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc. v. Porterfield

16 Ohio St. 2d 158 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1968

Our review is limited to the determination whether the *161 decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable or unlawful. Midwest Haulers, Inc., v. Glander, 150 Ohio St. 402 ; Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. … In reaching its decision in the instant case the Board of Tax Appeals relied upon its former determination in Miller Brewing Co. v. Schneider, Board of Tax Appeals No. 52020, 3 Ohio Tax Cases, par. 200-521.

State ex rel. Schwaben v. School Employees Retirement System

76 Ohio St. 3d 280 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1996

McMaster v. School Emp. … Fogle v. Steiner (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 158, 162 , 656 N.E.2d 1288, 1293 , quoting State v.

State v. Ware

63 Ohio St. 2d 84 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1980

See State v. Frazier (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 253 , 389 N.E. 2d 1118 . See, also, State v. Holt (1977), 223 Kan. 34 , 574 P. 2d 152 ; State v. Colbert (1976), 221 Kan. 203 , 557 P. 2d 1235 ; Perry v. … Brown, P. Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissenting. Locher, J., not participating. R.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Forbes

122 Ohio St. 3d 171 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 11, 2009

v. … Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Tyack

107 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 16, 2005

V(11)(B). Respondent did not answer, and relator moved for default under Gov.Bar R. V(6)(F). … Columbus Bar Assn. v. Moushey, 104 Ohio St.3d 427 , 2004-Ohio-6897 , 819 N.E.2d 1112 , ¶ 16.

York v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

64 Ohio St. 2d 199 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1980

Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Cas. Co. (1970), 22 Ohio St. 2d 161, 165 , 258 N. E. 2d 429 ; Curran v. State Automobile Mutl. Ins. Co. (1971), 25 Ohio St. 2d 33 , 266 N. E. 2d 566 ; see, also, Note 1, 20 Cleve. L. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sarver

150 Ohio St. 3d 1439 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 22, 2017

V(16), in which the board accepted the agreement entered into by relator, disciplinary counsel, and respondent, Jason Allan Sarver. … V(17)(D), this cause is remanded to the Board of Professional Conduct for further proceedings, including consideration of a more severe sanction.

Wells v. Chrysler Corp.

15 Ohio St. 3d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1984

Today, however, in Mullins v. Whiteway Mfg. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. In support of its argument, appellee cites the case of Starr v. Young (1961), 172 Ohio St. 317 [ 16 O.O.2d 105 ].

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Banks

94 Ohio St. 3d 428 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 2002

V(5)(A)(4). In re Banks (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1401 , 740 N.E.2d 674 . … The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”) referred the matter to board member Jean M. McQuillan for disposition pursuant to Gov.Bar R.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Moesle

106 Ohio St. 3d 475 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 2, 2005

in support of the second count as required by Dayton Bar Assn. v. … See Columbus Bar Assn. v.

Henshaw v. Noble

7 Ohio St. (N.S.) 226 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1857

And so it was held in Nimocks v. Inks, 17 Ohio, 596. Is there, then, such a misjoinder in the declaration before us? The general rule on this subject, which Mr. … In commenting upon this statute in the case of Nimocks v.