Case law

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Kieft

94 Ohio St. 3d 429 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 2002

As the board found, this conduct violates DR 6- *431 101(A)(3) and 9-102(B)(4), and respondent’s failure to cooperate in the investigation of Robinson’s grievance constitutes a violation of Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). Paul M. … As the board found, this conduct violates DR 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(2), and respondent’s failure to cooperate in the investigation of Scribbin’s grievance constitutes a violation of Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G).

Jacob v. Curry

42 Ohio St. 2d 145 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1975

Brown, J. This state’s traffic law violation point system is wholly contained in R. … C. 4507.40 (L) (effective January 1, 1974); Haas v. Curry (1974), 42 Ohio Misc. 1 .

Reynoldsburg Trucking, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

53 Ohio St. 2d 201 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1978

In Highway, Inc., v. Pub. Util. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Mossman v. Donahey

46 Ohio St. 2d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1976

Clover Bottom Hospital & School v. Townsend, (1974), 513 S. W. 2d 505 . Contra, Weppler v. School Board of Dade County (Fla. App., 1975), 311 So. 2d 409 . … Employees, supra, (Brennan, J., dissenting); Krause v. State (1972), 31 Ohio St. 2d 132, 149 , 285 N. E. 2d 736, 746 (Brown, J., dissenting). See, also, Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Corp., supra ( 337 U.

Layne v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

97 Ohio St. 3d 456 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 18, 2002

I Layne v. … III Lee v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mason

2018 Ohio 1858 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 14, 2018

V(16), in which the board accepted the agreement entered into by relator, disciplinary counsel, and respondent, Thomas Locke Mason. … V(17)(D), this cause is remanded to the Board of Professional Conduct for further proceedings, including consideration of a more severe sanction.

Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.

15 Ohio St. 3d 321 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co. (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 241 [ 7 O.O.3d 403 ]. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. W. Brown, Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent.

Sanders Transfer, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

58 Ohio St. 2d 21 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1979

Columbia Gas & Fuel Co., v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1930), 122 Ohio St. 473, 475 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Akron Bar Ass'n v. Harsey

142 Ohio St. 3d 97 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 17, 2015

In support of the recommended sanction, the parties cite four cases, three of which the board found instructive: Disciplinary Counsel v. … Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. . Effective January 1, 2015, Gov.Bar R.

Wymer-Harris Construction Co. v. Glass

122 Ohio St. 398 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 21, 1930

We have examined the cases cited, and with the exception of the case of Paducah Lumber Co. v. Paducah Water Supply Co., 89 Ky., 340 , 12 S. W., 554 , 13 S. W., 249 , 7 L. R. A., 77, 25 Am. St. … Rep., 536 , and the case of Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co., 124 N. C., 328 , 32 S. E., 720 , 46 L. R. A., 513, 70 Am. St. Rep., 598 , which cases are in exact conflict with the case of Blunk v.

Northwestern Ohio Bar Ass'n v. Lauber

104 Ohio St. 3d 121 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 2004

V(6)(F). {¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline referred the motion to a master commissioner. The master commissioner granted the motion for default and prepared a report for the board’s review. … V(6)(J) and Ohio State Bar Assn. v.

In re Estate of Henne

66 Ohio St. 2d 232 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 27, 1981

(Allison v. Allison, 15 Ohio St. 2d 44 , approved in part and overruled in part.)” … Brown and C. Brown, JJ., dissent. Potter, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J. Palmer, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J. If the Mercer will is set aside, Mrs.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CompManagement, Inc.

104 Ohio St. 3d 168 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2004

Nicodemus v. Indus. … (Attention is invited to Goodman v.

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Striff (Slip Opinion)

2019 Ohio 5285 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 2019

V(13)(C)(1);  Full and free disclosure to the board, Gov.Bar R. V(13)(C)(4);  The imposition of other penalties or sanctions, Gov.Bar R. … V.

City of Bellaire ex rel. Sedgwick v. Bellaire, Benwood & Wheeling Ferry Co.

105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 247 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 1922

In Port Richmond & Bergen Point Ferry Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County, 234 U. S., 317 , while Mr. … In the case of Conway v. Taylor’s Executor, 1 Black (66 U.

Orris v. Claudio

63 Ohio St. 2d 140 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1980

In Travelers Indemnity Co. v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Freedman

107 Ohio St. 3d 25 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 16, 2005

V(6)(H). We therefore review the board’s findings and recommendation regarding the remaining allegations — Counts I, V, and VI — of the amended complaint. Misconduct Count One {¶ 4} In July 2001, William L. … See Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Smith, 102 Ohio St.3d 10 , 2004-Ohio-1582 , 806 N.E.2d 495 ; Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lazzaro, 98 Ohio St.3d 509 , 2003-Ohio-2150 , 787 N.E.2d 1182 .

Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis

114 Ohio St. 3d 165 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2007

Bar Assn. v. … Akron Bar Assn. v.

Gulf Refining Co. v. Evatt

148 Ohio St. 228 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1947

App., 104 , 164 P., 428 ; McCarthy v. Civil Service Commission, 95 Cal. App., 749 , 273 P.; 98; Beard v. Rowan, 1 McLean, 135 , 2 Fed. Cas., 1172 . Norris v. … The board relies upon the decision of this court in the case of Cowen, Commr., v. State, ex rel. Donovan, 101 Ohio St., 387 , 129 N. E., 719 , in support of its position in that respect.

Neiswander v. Brickner

116 Ohio St. 249 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1927

In the instant case however, we see no reason for departing from the general rule announced in County Board of Education of Putman Co. v. Bd. of Education , 112 O. S., 108. … Board of Commrs. of Sanborn County (S. D.), 209 N. W., 341 ; Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker, 147 U. S., 47 , 13 S. Ct., 217 , 37 L. Ed., 72 ; McNutt v. State, 163 Ark., 122, 259 S. W., 1 .