Case law

Water Management, Inc. v. Stayanchi

15 Ohio St. 3d 83 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

Drake Medicine Co. v. Glessner (1903), 68 Ohio St. 337 ; Henry Gehring Co. v. McCue (1926), 23 Ohio App. 281 . … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Ford, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

DeRolph v. State

78 Ohio St. 3d 193 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1997

In Miller v. … School Dist. v.

Gast v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

39 Ohio St. 2d 29 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1974

In Soltz v. … Brown, JJ., concur. O’Neill, C. J., Herbert and P. Brown, JJ., concur in the syllabus and in the judgment.

State ex rel. Chapnick v. E. Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

93 Ohio St. 3d 449 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 17, 2001

CHAPNICK, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. EAST CLEVELAND CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Chapnick v. E. … Gerchak v.

Phillips v. Pelton

10 Ohio St. 3d 52 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1984

In Cannon v. Hamilton (1963), 174 Ohio St. 268 [ 22 O.O.2d 331 ], this court set forth several principles which are dispositive of this matter. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.

Bralley v. Daugherty

61 Ohio St. 2d 302 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1980

Comm. v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Kenney

110 Ohio St. 3d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 19, 2006

Moreover, as the board found, the recommended sanction is appropriate given the gravity of respondent’s misconduct, the aggravating factors, and the mitigation evidence. See Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(9) on the same conditions for a period of two years.

State Ex Rel. Reardon v. McDonald

124 Ohio St. 315 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1931

The board of elections of Franklin county duly appointed the relator as an assistant clerk of the board. … Board of Commissioners of Butler County, 95 Ohio St., 157 , 115 N. E., 919 . The controlling principle is very clearly and concisely stated in the case of State, ex rel. Attorney General, v.

McFadden v. Glander

147 Ohio St. 225 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1946

In construing Section 5570-1, General Code, in the ease of Ursuline Academy of Cleveland v. Board of Tax Appeals, 141 Ohio St., 563 , 49 N. … The rule to be applied here is announced in Ursuline Academy of Cleveland v. Board of Tax Appeals, 141 Ohio St., 559 , 49 N.

State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections

80 Ohio St. 3d 182 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1997

SUPERAMERICA GROUP v. LICKING COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS. [Cite as State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking Cty. … Drew v. Vinton Cty.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Manning

111 Ohio St. 3d 349 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 2006

Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 187, 191 , 658 N.E.2d 237 (imposing a six-month suspension on an attorney who falsely claimed that he had filed a paternity action for a client). … In this case, a longer suspension is warranted because respondent engaged in dishonest conduct for more than three years. {¶ 16} In Disciplinary Counsel v.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. McCord

141 Ohio St. 3d 1484 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 2015

This matter is remanded to the board for further proceedings under Gov.Bar R. V(12). It is further ordered that respondent’s motion to terminate the interim default suspension is granted. … Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII.

State v. Carter

3 Ohio St. 3d 15 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1983

Bryant, v. … Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Holmes, C. Brown and Dahling, JJ., dissent. Mahoney, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J. Dahling, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting by assignment.

Akron Bar Assn. v. Binger

139 Ohio St. 3d 186 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 22, 2014

V(6)(G) permits a unanimous panel of the board to order the dismissal of a count without referring the matter to the board or this court for review, but it requires the panel to provide notice to counsel of record and other … Instead, the panel certified its findings of fact and recommendations to the board in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(6)(H) and (I). Because the board did not order dismissal and provide the notices required by Gov.Bar R.

State v. Moore (Slip Opinion)

149 Ohio St. 3d 557 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2016

Brown at 334-335 . … Brown, 118 So.3d at 342 .

Ohio Edison Co. v. Porterfield

28 Ohio St. 2d 150 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1971

The law which the Board of Tax Appeals correctly applied was that which is to be found in Athens Home Telephone Co. v. Peck (1953), 158 Ohio St. 557 ; Erie Rd. Co. v. … Co. v. Peck, supra.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Harmon

143 Ohio St. 3d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 22, 2014

Disciplinary Counsel v. … See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Potter, 126 Ohio St.3d 50, 2010-Ohio-2521, 930 N.E.2d 307, ¶ 10; Disciplinary Counsel v.

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Smith

120 Ohio St. 3d 298 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 3, 2008

The board found that respondent had thereby violated Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G), and we adopt this finding. B. Case No. 2008-0760 1. … V(4)(G), we agree with the board that an indefinite suspension is warranted in case No. 2008-0760.

State ex rel. Barklow v. Appel

165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 498 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1956

Flynn, v. Board of Elections of Cuyahoga County, 164 Ohio St., 193 , 129 N. E. (2d), 623. As disclosed in that case, the use of mandamus in like actions has been approved in prior cases decided by this court. … Kirk, v. Wheatley, 133 Ohio St., 164 , 12 N.

State ex rel. Ohio Edison Co. v. Parrott

73 Ohio St. 3d 705 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1995

That scheme expresses the General Assembly’s intention that such powers are vested exclusively in the board. See, e.g., Chester Twp. v. Power Siting Comm. (1977), 49 Ohio St.2d 231 , 3 O.O.3d 367 , 361 N.E.2d 436 . … Pursuant to R.C. 4906.12, this exclusive jurisdiction applies equally to the board’s orders. 1 Chester Twp. v. Power Siting Comm., supra, 49 Ohio St.2d at 238 , 3 O.O.3d at 370 , 361 N.E.2d at 441 .