Case law

State v. Hooks

39 Ohio St. 3d 67 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1988

Jenkins, supra, State v. Williams (1986), 23 Ohio St. 3d 16 , 23 OBR 13, 490 N.E. 2d 906 ; State v. Brown (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 305 , 528 N.E. 2d 523 ; or aggravated burglary, State v. … State v. Jenkins, *71 supra; State v. Spisak (1988), 36 Ohio St. 3d 80 , 521 N.E. 2d 1 ; State v. Coleman (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 286 , 525 N.E. 2d 792 ; State v. Brown, supra; and State v. DePew, supra.

Kimball v. Kimball Bros.

143 Ohio St. 500 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1944

Ruth V. Burkett. Roll called. The vote resulted as follows: Ayes all. “The resolution was therefore declared adopted.” Ida E. … See Knowles v. Northern Texas Traction Co. (Tex. Civ. App.), 121 S. W., 232 . The trial court concluded that the board of directors was guilty of a failure to function. We accept that finding.

State ex rel. Smith v. Frost

74 Ohio St. 3d 107 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1995

Carter v. Wilkinson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 65 , 637 N.E.2d 1, 2 . … Ballard v. O’Donnell (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 182 , 553 N.E.2d 650 ; State ex rel. Lewis v. Moser (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 25, 28 , 647 N.E.2d 155, 157 ; State ex rel. Adams v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dugan

177 Ohio St. 3d 490 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 29, 2024

V(13)(B)(1). … First, without prompting from either relator or the board, Dugan sought other interim rehabilitation. See Gov.Bar R. V(13)(C)(8).

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cox (Slip Opinion)

168 Ohio St. 3d 78 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 22, 2022

V(13), and the sanctions imposed in similar cases. {¶ 29} The board found the presence of seven aggravating factors here: Cox (1) acted with a dishonest or selfish motive, (2) engaged in a pattern of misconduct, (3 … V(13)(B)(2) through (8). {¶ 30} As for mitigating factors, the board found that Cox has no prior discipline and presented evidence of his good character or reputation. See Gov.Bar R.

Moorman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

4 Ohio St. 3d 20 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1983

This court is also mindful of the holding in Home Indemnity Co. v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. J. P. Celebrezze, J., not participating.

State v. Beasley

4 Ohio St. 3d 24 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1983

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, speaking for the court in McBoyle v. United States (1931), 283 U.S. 25, 27 , stated: “* * * a fair warning should be given to the world in language that the world will understand * * *.” … Brown, Sweeney and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Accordingly, all four propositions of law articulated by the state which deal with the element of the crime “ready at hand” are inapposite and not reached.

Alexander Neff House & Land Co. v. Shry

132 Ohio St. 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1937

State ex rel. Mayers v. Gray

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 182 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1926

L. 22) the State Board of Optometry in revoking a license for grossly unprofessional conduct, is performing an executive and not a judicial function. 2. … The extraordinary wi’it of mandamus will not issue to compel the- State Board of Optometry to reinstate the license of an optometrist who has been notified of charges embodied in an affidavit, given an opportunity to make

Disciplinary Counsel v. Holland

106 Ohio St. 3d 372 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 19, 2005

Dayton Bar Assn. v. … Thus, in Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

White v. Clinton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

76 Ohio St. 3d 416 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1996

Patterson v. … Dayton v.

State Ex Rel. Miller v. Waid

145 Ohio St. 373 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1945

within eighteen months after this act becomes effective, upon due application therefor and the payment of the registration fee of fifteen ($15) dollars for professional engineers, or ten ($10) dollars for surveyors, the board … Although the answer admits that certain papers and statements were filed with the board, it in effect denies the truthfulness or accuracy of such statements.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Elum

148 Ohio St. 3d 606 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2016

Aggravating and mitigating factors {¶ 10} The board found one aggravating factor: that Judge Elum has prior discipline. See Gov.Bar R. V(13)(B)(1). … sanction, the board primarily relied on Disciplinary Counsel v.

State ex rel. Moore v. Malone

96 Ohio St. 3d 417 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 17, 2002

MOORE v. MALONE, CLERK. [Cite as State ex rel. Moore v. Malone, 2002-Ohio-4821.] … Moore v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cosgrove (Slip Opinion)

165 Ohio St. 3d 280 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 30, 2021

V(13)(B)(2) and (8). … See Disciplinary Counsel v.

G.S.T. v. City of Avon Lake

48 Ohio St. 2d 63 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1976

Driscoll v. Austintown Associates, supra, at page 273. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Wallace v. Tyack

13 Ohio St. 3d 4 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1984

Buck, v. McCabe (1942), 140 Ohio St. 535, 537 [ 24 O.O. 552 ]; State, ex rel. Smith, v. Friedman (1970), 22 Ohio St. 2d 25, 26 [ 50 O.O.2d 41 ]. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurs in judgment only.

Jewel Companies v. Porterfield

21 Ohio St. 2d 97 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1970

Our review in this type of case is limited to a determination as to whether the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable or unlawful. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc., v. … Mead Corp. v. Glander (1950), 153 Ohio St. 539 . Appellant’s truck is used in the following three ways: 1. As transportation for a route salesman to solicit orders for future sales (non-exempt use). 2.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Large

122 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 6, 2009

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Large, 122 Ohio St.3d 35, 2009-Ohio-2022.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. LARGE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Large, 122 Ohio St.3d 35, 2009-Ohio-2022.] … See, e.g., Bar Assn. of Greater Cleveland v.

State v. Clayton

62 Ohio St. 2d 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1980

In State v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Our decision is not affected by State v. Muscatello (1978), 55 Ohio St. 2d 201 , paragraph four of the syllabus.