Case law

Youngs v. Rogers

65 Ohio St. 2d 27 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1981

In re Larkins (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 21 ; McDuffie v. Berzzarins (1975), 43 Ohio St. 2d 23 ; In re Fisher (1974), 39 Ohio St. 2d 71 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. The one deviation from these cases is Sheffel v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hoague (Slip Opinion)

159 Ohio St. 3d 353 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 11, 2020

V(13)(B)(1), (2), and (4). {¶ 13} In mitigation, the parties stipulated and the board found that Hoague made full and prompt restitution to the state, made full and free disclosure to the board and exhibited a cooperative … v.

State v. Johnson

120 Ohio St. 3d 320 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2008

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, on the authority of State v. … The cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Brown. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Scott v. Houk

127 Ohio St. 3d 317 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 2, 2010

Rees (2008), 553 U.S. 35 , 128 S.Ct. 1520 , 170 L.Ed.2d 420 , or under Ohio law. {¶ 6} The dissent of Chief Justice Brown contends that this court has abdicated its responsibility to the federal courts to hear and settle … Baze held that “[pjermitting an Eighth Amendment violation to be established on [a showing that better alternatives exist] would threaten to transform courts into boards of inquiry charged with determining ‘best practices

Akron Bar Association v. Parkin.

155 Ohio St. 3d 596 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 2018

V(13)(B)(7). {¶ 29} The board found only one mitigating factor: Parkin lacks a disciplinary record. See Gov.Bar R. V(13)(C)(1). … Applicable precedent {¶ 30} The panel and the board relied on four cases in recommending a sanction. {¶ 31} In Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.

State ex rel. Hicks v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Elections

2026 Ohio 993 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 24, 2026

West v. … Lippitt v. Cuyahoga Cty.

State ex rel. Johnson v. Talikka

1994 Ohio 260 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1994

The county commissioners did not participate in Brown's application to appoint Talikka as special prosecutor, and the common pleas court held no hearings on Brown's application. … State v. Warner (1990), 55 Ohio St.3d 31, 41-45, 564 N.E.2d 18, 29-33; State v. Ross (1982), 6 Ohio App.3d 25, 6 OBR 76, 452 N.E.2d 339.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Berry (Slip Opinion)

166 Ohio St. 3d 112 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 3, 2021

V(13)(B)(2). The board also noted that because Doe did not testify at the judge’s disciplinary hearing, there was no evidence indicating what impact, if any, the judge’s conduct had on her. … V(13)(C)(1), (3), and (4). {¶ 16} Because the board could not find any Ohio precedent involving similar judicial misconduct, the board reviewed cases in other jurisdictions for guidance.

State ex rel. Gyurcsik v. Angelotta

50 Ohio St. 2d 345 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1977

Gargallo, v. Court of Common Pleas (1972), 31 Ohio St. 2d 45 ; State, ex rel. Masterson, v. Ohio State Racing Comm. (1955), 164 Ohio St. 312 ; State, ex rel. McKee, v. Cooper (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 65 . Civ. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Village v. General Motors Corp.

15 Ohio St. 3d 129 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

Peavy v. Flowers (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 407 [ 12 O.O.3d 349 ]; Ratner v. Daugherty (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 410 [ 12 O.O.3d 351 ]; Czarnecki v. … Brown, JJ;, concur. C. Brown, J., concurs separately. Holmes, J., concurs in the judgment. W. Brown, J., dissents.

State ex rel. Rachow v. Industrial Commission

58 Ohio St. 2d 17 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1979

General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 278, 282-283 . In State, ex rel. Wallace, v. Indus. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Holmes, JJ., concur. Locher, J., not participating.

State ex rel. Gabriel v. City of Youngstown

75 Ohio St. 3d 618 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1996

See, e.g., Joyce v. Gen. … In effect, the board of health is a separate entity from the city, and the board’s *621 employees are subject to state law. Id.; see, also, State ex rel. Fenwick v. Finkbeiner (Feb. 25, 1994), Lucas App. No.

State ex rel. Portage Lakes Edn. Assn., OEA/NEA v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

95 Ohio St. 3d 533 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 2002

PORTAGE LAKES EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, OEA/NEA, ET AL. v. STATE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Portage Lakes Edn. Assn., OEA/NEA v. State Emp. … Relations Bd. v.

State ex rel. Worrell v. Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund

112 Ohio St. 3d 116 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2006

Pipoly v. … Stiles v. School Emps.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cohen

142 Ohio St. 3d 471 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 2015

To support its recommended sanction, the board cites Ohio State Bar Assn. v. … Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. .

McCord v. Ohio Division of Parks & Recreation

54 Ohio St. 2d 72 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1978

Brown, P. BrowN, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, J., dissents. Statutes similar to R. … See Hamilton v. United States (E. D. Va. 1974), 371 F. Supp. 230 ; Garfield v. United States (W. D. Wisc. 1969), 297 F. Supp. 891 .

Disciplinary Counsel v. Carter

175 Ohio St. 3d 235 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 7, 2023

Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Marshall

143 Ohio St. 3d 62 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 1, 2015

Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CII. . … V(13), 140 Ohio St.3d CXXIV.

State v. Thomas

66 Ohio St. 2d 518 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1981

Brown, J. … Brown and Sweeney, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurs in the syllabus and judgment. Celebrezze, C. J., P. Brown and Locher, JJ., concur in the judgment.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mickens

147 Ohio St. 3d 1303 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 2016

In support of this recommendation, the board discussed three cases in which we publicly reprimanded attorneys under similar facts. First, in Columbus Bar Assn. v. … Bar Assn. v.