Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

1.39s

  • Brown v. Liberty Clubs, Inc.

    39 Ohio St. 3d 704 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1988

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goodman v. Buster Brown Co.

    83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 503 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1911

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miami Exporting Co. v. Brown

    6 Ohio 535 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1834

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Finley Brewing Co. v. Brown

    65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 609 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1902

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Findlay Brewing Co. v. Brown

    62 Ohio St. (N.S.) 202 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1900

    The rule announced in Heddleson v. Hendricks, 49 Ohio St., 297 , remains the law notwithstanding changes in the statute. Motion overruled.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex Goebel v. Brown

    4 Ohio Law. Abs. 323 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kiechler Mfg. Co.

    98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 440 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1918

    (Perry v. The M. O’Neil Company, 78 Ohio St., 200, approved and followed.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Zanesville Hotel Co.

    3 Ohio Law. Abs. 266 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1925

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of Toledo

    83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 491 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1911

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex Brown v. Cooper

    8 Ohio Law. Abs. 753 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1930

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Akron Bar Ass'n v. Brown

    14 Ohio St. 3d 24 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1984

    The court has reviewed the evidence presented to the board. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Ford, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex Goebel v. Brown

    4 Ohio Law. Abs. 323 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Executors of Brown v. Brabham

    3 Ohio 275 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1827

    It is contended, in the first place, that the proceeds of the draft have never been received by Brown. … Again, it is said that Brown used due diligence by employing a ■confidential agent, as he had a right to do.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Isaac Harter Co.

    74 Ohio St. (N.S.) 518 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1906

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smallwood v. Brown Clutch Co.

    85 Ohio St. (N.S.) 494 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1912

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commrs. v. Board of Commrs. of Trumbull Co.

    116 Ohio St. 663 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 1927

    After they were returned to Trumbull county, the board of county commissioners of Summit county rendered a bill to Trumbull county for the expense of such removal — the amount not being in dispute — payment of which was refused

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Schermerhorn v. Brown Twp. Bd. of Trs.

    2018 Ohio 923 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 14, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Wauford

    129 Ohio St. 3d 17 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2011

    Brown v. Wauford, 129 Ohio St.3d 17, 2011-Ohio-2858.] THE STATE EX REL. BROWN, APPELLANT, v. WAUFORD, DIR., APPELLEE. THE STATE EX REL. BROWN, APPELLANT, v. OLIVER, DIR., APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. … No. 20720086, and Hageman v. Brown, Hancock App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Borchers Ford, Inc.

    62 Ohio St. 2d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1980

    Brown, P. Brown, Lynch, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Lynch, J., of the Seventh Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J. See amendments to R. C. 1345.06 and 1345.07, effective August 11, 1978.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown Manufacturing Co. v. Robinson

    79 Ohio St. (N.S.) 465 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1909

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.