Case law

City of Toledo v. Brown

130 Ohio St. 513 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1936

Among many cases supporting the text may be cited the following: Matthews v. Silsby Brothers, 198 Iowa, 1392 , 201 N. W., 94 , 37 A. L. R., 1116; Board of Levee Commissioners v. … Varwig v. Cleveland, Cinn., Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co., 54 Ohio St., 455 , 44 N. E., 92 ; Jackson v. Turrell, supra; Severin v. Cole, 38 Iowa, 463 ; Sherwood, Admr., v. City of LaFayette, supra.

Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of Revision

90 Ohio St. 3d 564 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 17, 2001

by the board of revision. … Hibschman v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1943), 142 Ohio St. 47 , 26 O.O. 239 , 49 N.E.2d 949 .

Brown v. Liberty Clubs, Inc.

45 Ohio St. 3d 191 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1989

Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur. Holmes and Wright, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part. Ohio Adnj.

Brown v. Solon Restaurant Repair

65 Ohio St. 3d 1421 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1992

Hood v. Brown & Bentley

2 Ohio 266 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1826

The authority principally relied on, to support this position, is the case of Wilt v. … The deed as to the defendant, Brown, would take effect from its delivery. *248 The bill, as to the defendant, Brown, must be dismissed with costs. † HoTB by the Editob. — That a delivery of a deed'to a third person, without

Brown v. Borchers Ford, Inc.

53 Ohio St. 2d 171 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1978

This is an appeal from the judgment rendered by the Court of Appeals as a result of our remand of the cause to that court in Brown v. Borchers Ford, Inc. (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 38 . … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Herbert, J., dissents.

State ex Barney v. Brown

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 598 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1925

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Brown

78 Ohio St. 3d 345 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 14, 1997

We concur with the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly.

Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

34 Ohio St. 2d 231 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1973

Paragraph one of the syllabus in Lindblom v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, J., dissents. R.

State ex rel. Brown v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)

142 Ohio St. 3d 370 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 16, 2014

The Ashtabula County Board of Elections, relying solely on R.C. 3513.04, rejected Brown’s petitions. {¶ 4} Relators filed this action seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the board to certify his candidacy for the Western … . {¶ 7} Relators could not have filed this action on May 6, 2014, when Brown lost the primary election, because relators had no claim for relief until the board of elections refused to place Brown’s name on the ballot.

Board of Edn. v. Board of Edn.

31 Ohio Law Rep. 60 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 1965

Board of Education v. Board of Education

67 Ohio St. (N.S.) 326 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1902

These sections contemplate that an *329 agreement failing, the members of the several boards, interested shall constitute a special body for the consideration of the subject. … The action of the joint board provisionally established the joint subdistrict, and the statute pointed out a mode of procedure to be pursued by any who are dissatisfied therewith.

Board of Education v. High School Board

160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 240 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1953

Board of Education v. Board of Education

41 Ohio St. (N.S.) 680 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1884

The board of education of the township legally established a central or high school, and located the building for it in sub-district number 5 of the township. … The right of the township board to the school property, and to the control and management of the central or high school, had accrued before the act of May 1st, 1873, and the rights of this board were, therefore, not affected

Board of Education v. Board of Education

75 Ohio St. (N.S.) 583 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1906

Board of Education v. Board of Education

81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 542 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1910

Board of Education v. Board of Education

46 Ohio St. (N.S.) 595 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1889

And he cites from Stradling v. … The same principle was adopted in Whitney et al. v. Webb et al., 10 Ohio 513 in construing the. words “beyond the seas” in the statute of limitations. See also Slater et al. v. Cave, 3 Ohio St. 80 .

Board of Education v. Board of Education

50 Ohio St. (N.S.) 439 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1893

The attendance of such pupils in the school of such other district, without objection b}r either board, creates no liability against the board in whose district such pupils reside. 3. … Said section of the statute provides that the board of education may contract for the admission of such pupils, “ on such terms as may be agreed upon by such boards.”

Brown v. Wallbrown

82 Ohio St. 3d 384 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1998

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion to Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 281, 291 , 695 N.E.2d 732, 738 , I respectfully dissent.

State v. Brown

84 Ohio St. 3d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1998

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404 , 700 N.E.2d 570 . Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E.