Case law

Leach v. Brown

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1957

These circumstances would seem to present a typical situation for the application of the salutary principle enunciated by this court in the second paragraph of the syllabus in the case of Ritzman v.

Hart v. Brown

75 Ohio St. (N.S.) 600 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1906

Harmon v. Brown

86 Ohio St. (N.S.) 340 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 1912

Harmon v. Brown

84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 447 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1911

Murphy v. Brown

84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 476 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 9, 1911

Ricketts v. Brown

69 Ohio St. (N.S.) 570 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1904

Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

2018 Ohio 2953 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 27, 2018

Sua sponte, Thomas Christopher Brown, Attorney Registration No. 0024054, last known business address in Geneva, Ohio, found in contempt for failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before June 13, 2018.

State v. Brown-Bowman

2018 Ohio 923 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 14, 2018

Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

2017 Ohio 8009 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2017

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2017-Ohio-8009.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BROWN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2017-Ohio-8009.] … V(14)(A), the Board of Professional Conduct filed with this court a certification of default, alleging that respondent, Thomas Christopher Brown, failed to file an answer to a formal complaint pending before the board.

Brown v. Maxwell

2 Ohio St. 2d 153 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 1965

J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

127 Ohio St. 3d 1467 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2010

Board of Education v. Board of Revision

85 Ohio St. 3d 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1999

In case Nos. 98-758 and 98-984, the school board’s treasurer, Robert Burmeister, prepared, signed, and filed with the Cuyahoga County Board of Revision several counter-complaints on behalf of the school board. … Burmeister therefore engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in having prepared and filed the complaints on behalf of the school board. The school board should have engaged an attorney for that purpose.

City of Cincinnati v. Board of Education

56 Ohio St. (N.S.) 792 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1897

Board of Education v. Board of Revision

37 Ohio St. 3d 318 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1988

Once the school board had presented evidence that the property’s value was different from that determined by the board of revision, appellants, who were the appellees before the BTA, should have rebutted the school board’ … Brown, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent. Ohio Adm.

Board of Education v. Board of Revision

61 Ohio St. 2d 332 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1980

In numerous decisions, including Clippard Instrument v. Lindley (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 121 , we have confirmed our opinion in American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

142 Ohio St. 3d 459 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 2015

v. … . {¶ 19} The board’s recommendation that we impose a civil penalty of $1,000 for Brown’s unauthorized practice of law in Counts 1 and 2 for a total of $2,000 is consistent -with Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v.

Brown v. Adams Bros.

60 Ohio St. (N.S.) 599 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1899

Railroad Co. v. Brown

55 Ohio St. (N.S.) 665 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1896

State v. Brown (Slip Opinion)

161 Ohio St. 3d 276 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 30, 2020

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Brown, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-4623.] … SLIP OPINION NO. 2020-OHIO-4623 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BROWN, APPELLANT. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v.

Brown v. Shumaker & Gharkey

62 Ohio St. (N.S.) 645 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1900