Case law

Brown v. Kirkman

1 Ohio St. (N.S.) 116 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1853

Brown v. Bonnell

80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 710 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1909

Ginn v. Brown

80 Ohio St. (N.S.) 718 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1909

West v. Brown

6 Ohio St. (N.S.) 542 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1856

See Lawson and Covode v. Farmers’ Bank of Salem, 1 Ohio St. 206 . The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed. Bartley, C. L, and Swan, Brinkerhoee, and Scott, JJ., concurred.

Jones v. Brown

11 Ohio St. (N.S.) 601 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1860

Thurston v. Hays, 6 Ohio St. 1 . … The real ground of complaint is stated to be “ that Brown and Robison agreed, that in consideration of the annual payment of the usurious premium in advance, and the legal interest at 'the end of each year, the loan should

Brown v. State

26 Ohio St. (N.S.) 176 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

Brown v. Lanning

91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 443 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1915

Campbell v. Brown

134 Ohio St. 500 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1938

Brown v. State

11 Ohio St. 276 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1842

Brown, on March 1, 1840, with force and arms, in the county aforesaid, acted as an officer of a bank not incorporated by law, contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity … The statute gives this general form of the indictment, *and this court, in the case of Noah Lougee v. The State, at the last term, held it sufficient. Ante, 68.

State v. Brown

77 Ohio St. (N.S.) 636 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1908

Woodward v. Brown

73 Ohio St. (N.S.) 350 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1905

Rawson v. Brown

104 Ohio St. (N.S.) 537 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1922

Tabler v. Wiseman, 2 Ohio St., 207 , and Eberle v. Gaier, Jr., 89 Ohio St., 118 . In Tabler v. … Bernard v. Kemper, 60 Ohio St., 244 , where it is held: “1.

Derr v. Brown

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 758 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1926

Day v. Brown

2 Ohio 344 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1826

In Innes v. … That the covenant of warranty is not broken till after eviction by title paramount, v. 154; xvii. 66. 2.

Leverone v. Brown

82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 448 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 1910

Brown v. Kuhn

40 Ohio St. (N.S.) 468 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1884

The doctrine of Dodsworth v. Hoppel, 33 Ohio St., 16 , supports this position. This brings us to the merits. We think the evidence clearly proved that as between William A. … It is unnecessary in this case to decide whether a mortgagee, standing as Brown does, could recover on such a covenant.

Leach v. Brown

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1957

These circumstances would seem to present a typical situation for the application of the salutary principle enunciated by this court in the second paragraph of the syllabus in the case of Ritzman v.

Hart v. Brown

75 Ohio St. (N.S.) 600 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1906

Harmon v. Brown

86 Ohio St. (N.S.) 340 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 1912

Harmon v. Brown

84 Ohio St. (N.S.) 447 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1911