Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

2.03s

  • Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

    87 Ohio St. 3d 316 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1999

    OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL V. BROWN [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown, 1999-Ohio-74.] … Brown, pro se. __________________ COOK, J. {¶ 9} We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board, but we determine that disbarment is the appropriate sanction in this case.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    64 Ohio St. 3d 1436 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1992

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fogel v. Brown

    71 Ohio St. 3d 1417 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1994

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wilkinson

    63 Ohio St. 3d 1408 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1992

    Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    62 Ohio St. 3d 1432 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    62 Ohio St. 3d 1423 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    69 Ohio St. 3d 1450 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1994

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lattimore v. Brown

    68 Ohio St. 3d 1431 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1994

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    68 Ohio St. 3d 1477 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1994

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    37 Ohio St. 3d 714 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1988

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    66 Ohio St. 3d 1486 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 26, 1993

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    66 Ohio St. 3d 1479 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 13, 1993

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    132 Ohio St. 32 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1936

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ziegler v. Brown

    146 Ohio St. 224 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1946

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    4 Ohio Law. Abs. 323 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1926

    . _ It is the duty of the state supervisor of elections to exercise a sound discretion, in appointing members of boards of deputy state supervisors of elections, concerning the qualifications in general of persons seeking

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Brown

    28 Ohio St. (N.S.) 547 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hitchcock

    36 Ohio St. (N.S.) 667 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nagle v. Brown

    37 Ohio St. (N.S.) 7 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    38 Ohio St. (N.S.) 344 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

    Parrott, an elector of Clermont county, against Thomas Brown, sheriff of that county, to compel him to give notice, and make proclamation according to law, to the qualified electors of said county, to vote for a judge of … The counties of Clermont, Brown and Adams constitute the first subdivision ,of the fifth judicial district, and have always been entitled to one judge of the common pleas court, as pro *345 vided by the constitution.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Chapman

    91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 431 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1915

    Judgment affirmed on authority of Mc-Allister v. Hartsell, 60 Ohio St., 69 . Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.