Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.03s
87 Ohio St. 3d 316 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1999
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL V. BROWN [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown, 1999-Ohio-74.] … Brown, pro se. __________________ COOK, J. {¶ 9} We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board, but we determine that disbarment is the appropriate sanction in this case.
Cited 16 timesPublished63 Ohio St. 3d 1408 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1992
Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 Ohio Law. Abs. 323 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1926
. _ It is the duty of the state supervisor of elections to exercise a sound discretion, in appointing members of boards of deputy state supervisors of elections, concerning the qualifications in general of persons seeking
Cited 0 timesPublished38 Ohio St. (N.S.) 344 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882
Parrott, an elector of Clermont county, against Thomas Brown, sheriff of that county, to compel him to give notice, and make proclamation according to law, to the qualified electors of said county, to vote for a judge of … The counties of Clermont, Brown and Adams constitute the first subdivision ,of the fifth judicial district, and have always been entitled to one judge of the common pleas court, as pro *345 vided by the constitution.
Cited 0 timesPublished91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 431 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1915
Judgment affirmed on authority of Mc-Allister v. Hartsell, 60 Ohio St., 69 . Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna