Case law

Dayton Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. Dayton Board of Education

41 Ohio St. 2d 127 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1975

BRown, J. Labor relations law in the public sector lacks uniformity from state to state. … A board’s contractual capacity, or power, is described in paragraph one of the syllabus of Schwing v.

3535 Salem Corp. v. Lindley

58 Ohio St. 2d 210 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1979

Computer Services v. … Brown, J.

Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. Village of Glendale

42 Ohio St. 2d 368 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 28, 1975

Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (1926), 272 U. S. 365 ; State, ex rel. City Ice & Fuel Co., v. Stegner ( 1929), 120 Ohio St. 418 ; Curtiss v. Cleveland (1957), 166 Ohio St. 509 ; Willott v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Clarke v. Board of County Commrs.

141 Ohio St. 16 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1943

Atty., v.

State ex rel. Walsh v. Board of Elections

65 Ohio St. 3d 197 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1992

Latimer v. … Barrett v.

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Weiner

40 Ohio St. 2d 7 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1974

V(5)(b). We affirm the findings of the board and overrule respondent’s objections thereto. … BRown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

1495 Jaeger L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

132 Ohio St. 3d 222 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 21, 2012

In Oberlin Manor, Ltd. v. Lorain Cty. … Oberlin Manor relied on Wolf v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Columbus Board of Education v. Fountain Square Associates, Ltd.

9 Ohio St. 3d 218 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1984

Accordingly, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed and the valuation as determined by the board of revision is reinstated. Decision reversed. Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Hoague

88 Ohio St. 3d 321 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 28, 2000

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HOAGUE. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hoague, 2000-Ohio-340.] … to the board even after his letter of apology, we find, as did the board, that neither writing the letter to Panescu nor holding the inquisitory hearing was within the bounds of his legal authority.

Columbus Board of Education v. J.C. Penney Properties, Inc.

11 Ohio St. 3d 203 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1984

However, this court is without jurisdiction to consider those arguments because Penney did not file a notice of appeal from the board’s decision. R.C. 5717.04; Goldman v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents. Pursuant to Am. Sub. H.B.

State ex rel. Brown v. Summit County Court of Common Pleas

99 Ohio St. 3d 409 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 20, 2003

Hunter v. Cuyahoga Cty. … . {¶ 4} Moreover, Brown had an adequate remedy at law by appeal to raise any error by the trial court in calculating his jail-time credit. State ex rel. Jones v.

State ex rel. Celebrezze v. Board of County Commissioners

32 Ohio St. 3d 24 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1987

See, also, Holmes v. Holmes (1964), 65 Wash. 2d 230, 235 , 396 P. 2d 633, 635 ; Redman v. Evans (1947), 184 Tenn. 404, 411 , 199 S.W. 2d 115, 118 ; and Commercial Discount Co. v. Holland (1930), 107 Cal. … Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Village of Hudson v. Albrecht, Inc.

9 Ohio St. 3d 69 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1984

Downing v. Cook (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 149, 151 [ 23 O.O.3d 186 ]; Brown v. Cleveland (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 93, 95 [ 20 O.O.3d 88 ]. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. C. Brown, J., dissents. This trend has also been evidenced in several appellate court decisions. See, e.g., Pepper Pike v.

DeLong v. Board of Education of Southwest School District

36 Ohio St. 2d 62 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1973

Kelley Co. v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. We note that no constitutional due-process claim was here raised by appellant. However, both parties did discuss Orr v. Trinter (C.

Abex Corp. v. Kosydar

35 Ohio St. 2d 13 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1973

In support of its dismissal, the board quotes from two decisions by this court which required that notices of appeal to the board must specify the errors complained of. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert and Corrigan, JJ., dissent.

Fort Frye Teachers Ass'n v. State Employment Relations Board

81 Ohio St. 3d 392 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1998

Grava v. Parkman Twp. (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 379, 381 , 653 N.E.2d 226, 228 . … Norwood v. McDonald (1943), 142 Ohio St. 299 , 27 O.O. 240 , 52 N.E.2d 67 , paragraph three of the syllabus; Trautwein v. Sorgenfrei (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 493 , 12 O.O.3d 403 , 391 N.E.2d 326 , syllabus; Goodson v.

Loveland Pines v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

66 Ohio St. 3d 387 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1993

The thrust of appellant’s argument is that the BTA erred in applying this court’s decisions in Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Revision (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 16 , 523 N.E.2d 826 ; Canton Towers, Ltd. v. … As we said in Witt Co. v. Hamilton Cty.

City of North Olmsted v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

62 Ohio St. 2d 218 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 21, 1980

This court has held that only complainants before the board of revision have standing to appeal a determination by that body to the Board of Tax Appeals. 1 Bd. of Edn. v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Appellants contend that the Board of Tax Appeals acted improperly in dismissing their appeal without a hearing on the matter.

Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Papcke

81 Ohio St. 3d 91 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1998

LORAIN COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. PAPCKE. [Cite as Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Papcke, 1998-Ohio-452.] … . {¶ 6} We adopt the findings of the board and conclude that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), and (6), 6-101(A)(3), and also Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G).

Chester Township v. Geauga County Budget Commission

48 Ohio St. 2d 372 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1976

Co. v. Commrs. of Clinton County (1852), 1 Ohio St. 77 , paragraph two of the syllabus; Kroger Co. v. Schneider (1967), 9 Ohio St. 2d 80, 85 , 223 N. E. 2d 606 . This court stated in Bd. of Co. Commrs. v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert and Stern, JJ., dissent.