Case law

Board of Education v. Volk

72 Ohio St. (N.S.) 469 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1905

There is no statute whereby a board of education can be made liable for damages for its negligence or want of care. In Finch v. … Cooley on Torts, marginal page 123; United States v. Peters, 5 Cranch, 139 ; Osborn v. Bank of U. S., 9 Wheat., 738 ; United States v. McLemore, 4 How., 286 ; Hill v. United States, 9 How., 386.

Board of Education v. McLandsborough

36 Ohio St. (N.S.) 227 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1880

In State v. … People v. Supervisor, 16 Mich. 254 , and Bristol v.

Smith v. Board of Education

27 Ohio St. (N.S.) 44 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

Hammond v. Hammond, 21 Ohio St. 620 ; Pendleton Street R. R. Co. v. Stallman’s Adm’x, 22 Ohio St. 1 ; Dean v. King, Ib. 118. But in this case the new trial was allowed by the court which tried the case. … This affords a good reason for applying to the case the rule, as settled in Conord v.

Newton v. Board of Commissioners

26 Ohio St. (N.S.) 618 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

The authority given to a city council to sell its real estate, it is said, can only be exercised “ upon the recommendation of the board of city improvements,” and here there was no such recommendation. … The answer to this objection is that the city of Youngstown had no such board; and that by section 602 of the code, as amended in 1870, the city council, in such cases, perform all the duties required of the board of -improvements

State ex rel. Harper v. Board of Education

7 Ohio St. 2d 49 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1966

Wuebker, v. Bockrath et al., Trustees (1949), 152 Ohio St. 77 . … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Stoll v. Logan County Board of Elections

117 Ohio St. 3d 76 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 5, 2008

But neither he nor anyone else contacted Brown. At the board’s November 27 meeting, Brown asked for a response to the request, and on November 29, the township fiscal officer provided some of the requested records. … Brown v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Elections, 109 Ohio St.3d 63 , 2006-Ohio-1292 , 846 N.E.2d 8, ¶ 23 .

Colonial Village Ltd. v. Washington County Board of Revision

114 Ohio St. 3d 493 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 26, 2007

Options, Inc. v. … Simmons v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 47 , 49, 689 N.E.2d 22 . We have also held that decisions of boards of revision should not be accorded a presumption of validity. Columbus Bd. of Edn. v.

State ex rel. Finley v. Board of Education

10 Ohio Law. Abs. 670 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1931

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Richardson

95 Ohio St. 3d 499 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2002

Respondent answered, and the matter was referred to a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”). {¶ 2} The parties waived a hearing, and the panel found based upon joint … V(4)(G) (no attorney shall neglect or refuse to assist or testify in a disciplinary investigation or hearing) in the Theresa Brown matter and in the Michael Brown matter.

Fineberg v. Kosydar

44 Ohio St. 2d 1 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1975

See Zephyr, supra; and Lee Jewelry Co. v. Bowers (1955), 162 Ohio St. 567 . The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. O ’Neinl, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. … Brown, JJ., concur.

Westhaven, Inc. v. Wood County Board of Revision

81 Ohio St. 3d 67 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1998

This court is neither a super Board of Tax Appeals nor a trier of fact de novo. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Revision (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 398, 400 , 20 O.O.3d 349, 351 , 422 N.E.2d 846, 848 . … Where the county auditor and the board of revision are appellees before the BTA, they are not required to present any evidence. In Western Industries, Inc. v. Hamilton Cty.

State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement Board

111 Ohio St. 3d 118 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2006

In addition, although some courts have rejected the use of a need requirement in actions brought under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(B)(2), see, e.g., Brown v. … Gladman, and Kerstin Sjoberg-Witt, for appellee Public Employees Retirement Board.

State ex rel. Rhodes v. Board of Elections

12 Ohio St. 2d 4 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1967

By this action, relators seek to compel the respondent Board of Elections of Lake County to place the following resolution proposed by initiative petition on the ballot: “Be it resolved by the people of the Village of Willoughby … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Grace v. Board of Elections

149 Ohio St. 173 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1948

Harsha, v. Troxel et al., Board of Elections of Scioto County, 125 Ohio St., 235 , 181 N. … Shriver, County Engineer, v. Hayes, 148 Ohio St., 681 , and State, ex rel. Heck, Pros. Atty., v. Ahlers, 79 Ohio App., 311 , 71 N.

Estate of Ruff v. Nichols

18 Ohio St. 3d 397 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1985

In Eastland Woods v. Tallmadge (1983), 2 Ohio St. 3d 185 , we addressed the meaning of the phrase “abutting landowner,” and adopted a definition utilized by the Nebraska Supreme Court in Lincoln v. … See Eastland Woods v. Tallmadge, supra; Kinnear Mfg. Co. v. Beatty (1901), 65 Ohio St. 264 , 282-283.

LTC Properties, Inc. v. Licking County Board of Revision

133 Ohio St. 3d 111 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 6, 2012

Bd. of Revision v. … As a result, we will not reverse the BTA’s determination without a showing that the board’s “attitude is unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable.” See J.M. Smucker, L.L.C. v.

Carbone v. Overfield

6 Ohio St. 3d 212 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1983

Brown, J. … Brown, J., concurs in judgment only. Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent. In Russell v. Men of Devon (1788), 100 Eng.

In re Election Contest of Democratic Primary Held May 4, 1999 for Clerk, Youngstown Mun. Court

88 Ohio St. 3d 258 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 28, 2000

Brown-Clark and the board filed motions to dismiss. … Sinay v.

Brown v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.

109 Ohio St. 3d 1484 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 24, 2006

Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted; the cause is held for the decision in 2006-0405, Geretz v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., Erie App. No.

State Ex Rel. Bradford v. Board of Education

145 Ohio St. 561 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1945