Case law

State ex rel. Parker v. Ohio Parole Board

68 Ohio St. 3d 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1993

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed based on Bloss v. Rogers (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 145 , 602 N.E.2d 602 . Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E.

Beerman Foundation, Inc. v. Board of Tax Appeals

152 Ohio St. 179 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1949

The entry of the Board of Tax Appeals in the present case states: “All eight of. these veteran tenants pay rent. None are housed free of costs. … Barnabas for Nurses v. Board of Tax Appeals, 150 Ohio St., 484 , 83 N. E. (2d), 229.

Harris v. Rootstown Township Zoning Board of Appeals

44 Ohio St. 2d 144 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1975

“Mentor Lagoons v. Boards, 168 O. … Brown and P,-Brown, JJ., concur.

H. W. Brown & Co. v. D. W. Mott & Bros.

22 Ohio St. (N.S.) 149 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1871

Brown v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters, Local Union No. 7

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 28 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1957

Woodrum v. Rolling Hills Board of Education

66 Ohio St. 2d 284 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1981

Foss, v. … Brown, P. Brown, Locher and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Corrigan and Holmes, JJ., concur on the basis of the *287 concurring opinion of Holmes, J., in State, ex rel. Voss, v. Bd. of Edn. (1981), 66 Ohio St. 2d 274, 279 .

Smith v. Granville Township Board of Trustees

77 Ohio St. 3d 1213 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1996

Upon consideration of appellants’ motion to join Licking County Board of Elections as a necessary party, to grant an R.C. 2503.40 “other writ” and, in the alternative, to expedite discretionary appeal, IT IS ORDERED by the

United States v. Board of Tax Appeals

145 Ohio St. 257 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 1945

Co. v. Price County, 133 U. S., 496, 504 , 33 L. Ed., 687 , 10 S. Ct., 341 , Mr. … Under the law applicable to the instant case, we are of the opinion that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals appealed from is unlawful and should be and hereby is reversed and the case remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals

Shepard Paint Co. v. Board of Trustees

153 Ohio St. 591 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 1950

State ex rel. Loss v. Board of Elections

29 Ohio St. 2d 233 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1972

The action of the board of elections in rejecting the petition was not an abuse of discretion or contrary to law. State, ex rel. Reese, v. Bd. of Elections (1966), 6 Ohio St. 2d 66 .

State ex rel. Williams v. Bozarth

55 Ohio St. 2d 34 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1978

Brown, v. Rockside (1976), 47 Ohio St. 2d 76 . Bespondent stresses Herrick v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Ohio Masonic Home v. Board of Tax Appeals

52 Ohio St. 2d 127 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1977

This court’s duty is limited to determining whether the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals was unreasonable or unlawful.” Further, in White Cross Hospital Assn. v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, being neither unreasonable nor unlawful, is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Celebbezze; W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. O’Neill, C. J., dissents.

State ex rel. Schneider v. Board of Education

39 Ohio St. 3d 281 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1988

Miller v. Court of Common Pleas (1944), 143 Ohio St. 68, 70 , 28 O.O. 19, 20 , 54 N.E. 2d 130, 131-132 . See, also, John Weenink & Sons Co. v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Muirfield Ass'n v. Franklin County Board of Revision

73 Ohio St. 3d 710 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1995

We have already recognized the limitation on value generated by zoning restrictions in Porter v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Hill v. Williams (1906), 104 Md. 595, 603-604 , 65 A. 413, 414 . Moreover, in Beckett Ridge Assn. v.

Lorain County Board of Health v. Diewald

110 Ohio St. 3d 1216 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 19, 2005

Auto Brokers Corp. v. Gen. Motors Corp. … (C.A.2, 1978), 572 F.2d 953 , 958 (the “prior representation of a party by a judge or his firm with regard to a matter unrelated to litigation before him does not automatically require recusal”); Mustafoski v.

State ex rel. Spangler v. Board of Elections

7 Ohio St. 3d 20 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1983

It is well-settled that the decision of a board of elections will not be disturbed absent a showing that the decision constituted an abuse of discretion or clear disregard of applicable law. See State, ex rel. Flynn, v. … Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. W. Brown, Locher and Holmes, JJ., dissent.

Board of County Commissioners v. Village of Marblehead

86 Ohio St. 3d 43 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1999

See, e.g., Columbus v. Teater (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 253, 260-261 , 7 O.O.3d 410, 414 , 374 N.E.2d 154, 159 ; Canton v. … In fact, this court has held that a board’s power to regulate sewer districts in the interest of public health and welfare constitutes a valid exercise of state police powers. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v.

Detroit Toledo & Ironton Railroad v. Board of Commissioners

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 57 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1926

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Board of Education

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 404 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1926

Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Monroe County Board of Revision

66 Ohio St. 2d 410 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1981

Bd. of Revision v. Fodor (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 52 . Also, to make it clear at the outset that we adhere to the principle previously set forth in Conalco v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Potter, Palmer, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Locher, J., dissents.