Case law

State ex rel. Precision Steel Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)

145 Ohio St. 3d 76 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 24, 2015

Neither Ohio Adm.Code 4123:1-5-14(G) nor Ohio Adm.Code 4123:1-5-15(B) establishes a specific safety requirement in the context of this case. … Similarly, it is unreasonable to expect that the rule must delineate each and every specific part or piece of a ten-ton overhead power crane that may qualify as equipment.

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Forsthoefel

170 Ohio St. 3d 292 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 11, 2022

. {¶ 22} We note, however, that Judge Forsthoefel asserted in his affidavit that some of the documents contain information that would not qualify as a “court record” under Sup.R. 44. … (E), and establish a method by which restricted records may be accessed, Sup.R. 45(F).

Internatl. Paper Co. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)

150 Ohio St. 3d 348 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 26, 2016

. {¶ 2} A taxpayer’s first step in claiming the credit is filing a report to establish the total amount of credit that might be taken over a 10- to 20-year period. R.C. 5751.53(B) and (D). … Levin, 121 Ohio St.3d 292 , 2009-Ohio-583 , 903 N.E.2d 1188, ¶ 23 , in which the appellee tax commissioner could not, as an alternative ground for affirmance, challenge the BTA’s explicit finding that the lessee entity qualified

Musto v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

148 Ohio St. 3d 456 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2016

In Musto’s case, the county auditor exercised his statutory authority to appoint a qualified employee — Kilroy—“to serve in [his] place and stead on” the board of revision. … Here, Musto has failed to establish that she was injured or aggrieved by Kilroy’s dual role.

Arrington v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

109 Ohio St. 3d 539 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 12, 2006

Section 35 specifically empowered the General Assembly to impose a regime through which a worker who suffers injury or occupational disease caused by conditions in the workplace is compensated through a fund established by … Washington (1917), 243 U.S. 219, 235 , 37 S.Ct. 260 , 61 L.Ed. 685 . {¶ 25} A claim for benefits pursuant to Ohio workers’ compensation statutes clearly differs from a common-law tort in significant ways.

Rammelsberg v. Mitchell

29 Ohio St. 22 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

It shall be lawful for the surviving partner or partners, with the consent of the administrator or executor, and the approval of the probate court by which such ad *50 ministrator or executor may have been appointed or qualified … Undoubtedly the intention to convert out and out should bo made to appear clearly; but such intention may be inferred from circumstances with sufficient clearness.

Hooten v. Safe Auto Insurance

100 Ohio St. 3d 8 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 24, 2003

for parties’ briefs and Civ.R. 56 materials when a local court rule clearly does so. … The Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, and Twelfth Districts (as well as the Tenth District, as qualified above), have found that a local rule of court can notify the parties that a motion for summary judgment may

State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.

97 Ohio St. 3d 25 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 16, 2002

Thus, we characterized as voluntary “a termination generated by the claimant’s violation of a written work rule or policy that (1) clearly defined the prohibited conduct, (2) had been previously identified by the employer … In establishing the “former position of employment” test for TTD claims, Ramirez was merely informing us that a standard exists for measuring “total disability” in TTD claims that differs from that used to measure “total

City of Cincinnati v. Testa

143 Ohio St. 3d 371 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 14, 2015

clearly expresses the exemption in relation to the claim. … Prop *375 erty qualifies for that exemption when it satisfies three prerequisites: “(1) the property must be public property, (2) the use thereof must be for a public purpose, and (3) the property must be used exclusively

State v. White

85 Ohio St. 3d 433 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 12, 1999

Payne clearly allows such testimony when the crimes are so interrelated that victims are affected by more than just the capital death. … None of defendant’s claims establishes ineffective assistance. Accordingly, defendant’s tenth proposition is overruled. IX.

Hamilton v. Board of County Commissioners

108 Ohio St. (N.S.) 566 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1923

(The order of May 28 was an order, not to establish a ditch, but to vacate a previous order of the board of county commissioners establishing a ditch.) … Cooley, was not á disinterested person and therefore was not qualified to act as such commissioner.

State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Serv. Emps. Assn. v. State (Slip Opinion)

146 Ohio St. 3d 315 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 11, 2016

Constitution contains the one-subject rule: “No bill shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly-expressed in its title.” … immunity for athletic coaches, actions by a roller skater with supporting affidavits in a medical claim” all under the purported subject of “ ‘tort and other civil actions.’ ” Id. at 499 .

State v. Campbell

69 Ohio St. 3d 38 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1994

The officer was not qualified to render such an opinion, and we think it likely that this experienced trial judge understood that. … Further, the judge said: “It must be established * * * that at the time in question there was present in the mind of the defendant a specific intention to kill Henry Turner * * (Emphasis added.)

State v. Wogenstahl

75 Ohio St. 3d 344 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1996

The Haldo Alpha test was incapable of establishing specific identification. … Moreover, we note that Miller’s testimony concerning the prior aggravated burglary conviction was clearly admissible because the prosecution bore the burden of establishing the prior aggravated felony specification in connection

Lucht v. Behrens

28 Ohio St. (N.S.) 231 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

He left a widow and several minor cMldren, and under the will his brother, Anthony Neulson, was appointed and •qualified as executor, and served as such until 1869, when, he resigned, and the plaintiff in error was appointed … may be, and thereby subject the estate to all the hazards of the venture, would encourage that which it has been the especial policy of the law to prevent *241 —the employment of trust property in any other mode than is clearly

Machine Co. v. Insurance Co.

50 Ohio St. (N.S.) 549 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1893

Wall, 31 Ohio St., 633 , it has been so qualified by these subsequent cases as to limit the rule it announced to policies in their strict technical sense, and leave unaffected by it, parol contracts of insurance. … But, as it was agreed the new policies were to be exchanged for the canceled policy, it must have been as clearly understood as if it had been expressly stated, that they were to cover the property included in the canceled

State ex rel. Adkins v. Cole

2025 Ohio 1026 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 27, 2025

In three of the cases (Nos. 2024- 0740, 2024-0747, and 2024-0856), Adkins did not file evidence in accordance with the case schedule we established when granting the alternative writ. … (an initially proper withholding of a record as a security record does “‘not establish the exception in perpetuity’”).

In re C.F.

113 Ohio St. 3d 73 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 28, 2007

motions for permanent custody filed pursuant to R.C. 2151418. ” {¶ 21} Because of the broad scope of this question and because it does not directly address the more narrow conflict presented in the conflict cases, we must qualify … “[W]e cannot override unambiguous statutory language” and establish additional burdens not required by law.

State v. Lorraine

66 Ohio St. 3d 414 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1993

Jackson testified that by this age appellant clearly had symptoms of a conduct disorder that required immediate strong controls to prevent it from developing into an antisocial personality disorder. … We have held that a behavior or personality disorder does not qualify as a mental disease or defect. State v. Richey (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 353, 372 , 595 N.E.2d 915, 930-931 .

State ex rel. McCleary v. Roberts

88 Ohio St. 3d 365 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 12, 2000

The trial court held that the information requested by appellee did not qualify as a public record. … R.C. 149.011 provides: “(A) ‘Public office’ includes any state agency, public institution, political subdivision, or any other organized body, office, agency, institution, or entity established by the laws of this