Case law

Board of County Commissioners v. Gibson

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 341 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 13, 1924

Terrell v. Board of Liquor Control

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 294 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1960

Board of Infirmary Directors v. Parrett

87 Ohio St. (N.S.) 494 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1912

Board of Liquor Control v. Tsantles

156 Ohio St. (N.S.) 512 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1952

Section 6064-3, General Code, relating to the powers of the Board of Liquor Control, provides in part: ‘ ‘ The Board of Liquor Control shall have power except as otherwise provided in this section: “1. … Mandalla, v. Bryant, Dir., State, ex rel. King, v. Bryant, Dir., and State, ex rel. Eckler, v.

Atwill v. Board of County Commissioners

81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 502 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1909

Wolford v. Board of County Commissioners

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 631 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1913

Board of County Commissioners v. Merriman

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 405 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1914

Board of County Commissioners v. Landor

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 439 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 5, 1914

Valigore v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

105 Ohio St. 3d 302 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 27, 2005

Smith v. Padgett (1987), 32 Ohio St.3d 344, 347-348 , 513 N.E.2d 737 . As we have said, the BTA “may accept all, part, or none” of a witness’s testimony. Simmons v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Throckmorton v. Hamilton Cty.

State Ex Rel. Lucas County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Public Employees Retirement Board

123 Ohio St. 3d 146 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 16, 2009

Disabilities v. Pub. Emps. Retirement Bd., 123 Ohio St.3d 146, 2009-Ohio-4694.] THE STATE EX REL. LUCAS COUNTY BOARD OF MENTAL RETARDATION & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, APPELLANT, v. … Van Dyke v. Pub. Emps.

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ross

107 Ohio St. 3d 354 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 11, 2006

Attorney Grievance Comm. v. Kent (1995) 337 Md. 361, 379 , 653 A.2d 909 . … People v.

City of Cincinnati v. Board of Education

53 Ohio St. (N.S.) 655 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1895

Railroad Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

58 Ohio St. (N.S.) 698 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1898

Hardy v. Delaware County Board of Revision

106 Ohio St. 3d 359 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 19, 2005

Bethesda Healthcare, Inc. v. … Buildings IV & V, L.P. v. Franklin Cty.

Freshwater v. Belmont County Board of Revision

58 Ohio St. 3d 140 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1991

Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Gammarino v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

80 Ohio St. 3d 32 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1997

In Sharon Village Ltd. we affirmed the BTA’s decision, which held that the complaints filed with the board of revision were not “sufficient to repose jurisdiction in the Licking County BOR.” Sharon *34 Village Ltd. v. … In Stanjim Co. v. Mahoning Cty.

Hill v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

68 Ohio St. 2d 39 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1981

Allen, v. Bd. of Elections (1959), 170 Ohio St. 19 ; cf., Billington v. Cotner (1971), 25 Ohio St. 2d 140 . … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Landerhaven v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

72 Ohio St. 3d 31 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1995

Lyons v. Limbach (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 92, 94 , 532 N.E.2d 106, 109 .” See, also, Koblenz v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1966), 5 Ohio St.2d 214 , 34 O.O.2d 424 , 215 N.E.2d 384 . … Assn. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Portis v. Summit County Board of Elections

67 Ohio St. 3d 590 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1993

Portis submitted records and testimony from the board of elections placing Tarle’s voting residence outside the Fifth Ward since the November 1992 general election. … Brown v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Elections (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 166 , 545 N.E.2d 1256 ; State ex rel. Nichols v. Vinton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1985), 20 Ohio St.3d 1 , 20 OBR 75, 484 N.E.2d 690 ; and State ex rel.

Board of Trustees v. City of Centerville

65 Ohio St. 3d 226 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1992

Loofbourrow v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Cty. Commrs. (1957), 167 Ohio St. 156 , 4 O.O.2d 145 , 146 N.E.2d 721 . … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. . We note that the township trastees received a stay prior to the journalization of the board’s decision. The board may now proceed by journal entry to approve the annexation.