Case law

Throckmorton v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

75 Ohio St. 3d 227 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1996

Ohio Adm.Code Chapter 5717-1, which contains the rules of the Board of Tax Appeals, sets forth at Ohio Adm.Code 5717-1-11: “(A) Unless made at a hearing or otherwise ordered, any request to the board shall be by written motion … This court is not a “ ‘super’ board of tax appeals.” Hercules Galion Products, Inc. v. Bowers (1960), 171 Ohio St. 176 , 12 O.O.2d 292 , 168 N.E.2d 404 . We will not reweigh the evidence.

Anderson v. Ohio State Medical Board

49 Ohio St. 3d 601 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1990

Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents.

Stratton v. Board of Tax Appeals

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 219 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 3, 1961

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Tart, Matthias, Bell, Radclirr and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Welsh v. Ohio State Medical Board

168 Ohio St. (N.S.) 520 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1959

The question to be determined in this appeal is whether, under Section 119.12, Revised Code, appellant may appeal from the order of the State Medical Board to the Common Pleas Court of Cuyahoga County, or whether, as held … the order of the agency to the Court of Common Pleas of the county in which the place of business of the licensee is located or the county in which the licensee is a resident, provided that appeals from decisions of the Board

Mills v. City Board of Elections

54 Ohio St. (N.S.) 631 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1896

Judgment affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. v. City of Cincinnati, 19 Ohio, 178. Minshall, C. J. and Bradbury and Burket, JJ., dissent.

Eshelby v. Cincinnati Board of Education

66 Ohio St. (N.S.) 71 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1902

That section designates them as “public money * * * belonging * * * to the board of education,” and makes it unlawful for the treasurer “to use, loan or invest it in any manner.” … While the proviso of that section makes it lawful for the treasurer of a board of education to deposit the funds in his keeping, it designates them as “public money.”

Cleveland Board of Education v. Featherstone

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 53 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1923

Clark v. Cook, 103 OS. 465 , does not apply to the instant case. (b) The judgment of the Court of Appeals is contrary to law in that it holds that a clerk-treasurer of a board of education is not a public officer. … (c) The judgment of the Court of’Appeals is contrary to law in that it follows the rule enunciated in State v. Fronzier, 77 OS. 7 , and refuses to follow the law laid down in State ex rel. v. Maharray, 97 OS. 272 .

Thomas v. Board of County Commissioners

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 489 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1913

This continued until March, 1891, when an act was passed providing for the appointment of a prosecuting attorney of the police court by the mayor with the advice and consent of the board of legislation. … The cases of The State, ex rel., v. Jones, 66 Ohio St., 453 , and The State, ex rel., v.

Hasch v. Board of County Commissioners

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 415 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1914

Board of County Commissioners v. Hahn

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 438 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 5, 1914

Smith v. Board of Tax Appeals

159 Ohio St. (N.S.) 183 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1953

After notice of appeal was filed, the parties, through their counsel of record, filed in this court a stipulation reciting that there has been filed with the Board of Tax Appeals an adjusted abstract “in that the aggregate … The appeal is dismissed on authority of Miner v. Witt, City Clerk, 82 Ohio St., 237 , 92 N. E., 21 . Appeal dismissed. Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taet, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Stewart, JJ., concur.

County Board of Education v. Moorehead

105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 237 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 31, 1922

Has the board of education without abuse exercised such discretion? … In this provision the legislature did not confine the board of education to the replacement of one schoolhouse by another, but specifically empowered the board to replace “the schools of the district” by “a new schoolhouse

Eberhardt v. Board of County Commissioners

92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 512 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1915

Board of County Commissioners v. McAdow

77 Ohio St. (N.S.) 619 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1907

Carson v. Board of County Commissioners

86 Ohio St. (N.S.) 335 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1912

Board of County Commissioners v. Azbell

83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 517 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1911

Smith v. Board of County Commissioners

74 Ohio St. (N.S.) 434 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1906

Board of Park Commissioners v. Wyman

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 332 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1925

Brennan v. Board of Tax Appeals

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 263 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1963

It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals on factual issues but only to determine from an examination of the record whether the decision reached by the board is unreasonable … From an examination of the record, this court is unable to find that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable or unlawful. The decision is, therefore, affirmed. Decision affirmed. Taft, C.

Cook v. State Teachers Retirement Board

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 117 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1964

of service outside of Ohio, he thereby accepted the state’s offer and the retirement board became obligated to treat his non-Ohio service as if it were prior Ohio service. … The terms of the “Certificate of Prior Service” issued to him in 1941 by the retirement board is evidence that the board had the same understanding.