Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohio

10,000+ results

0.37s

  • Brodie v. Summit County Children Services Board

    51 Ohio St. 3d 112 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1990

    In Harlow v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Ursuline Academy v. Board of Tax Appeals

    141 Ohio St. 563 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1943

    See Gerke, Treas., v. Purcell, 25 Ohio St., 229 . However, as pointed out in Wehrle Foundation v. … See, also, ibid, pp. 100, 122 and 11 American Jurisprudence, 642, 690. *572 In the case of Turnverein “Lincoln” v. Board of Appeals, 358 Ill., 135 , 192 N.

    Overruled in part, on other grounds by Denison University v. Board of Tax Appeals, 2 Ohio St. 2d 17 (1965)Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Zindle v. Summit County Board of Revision

    44 Ohio St. 3d 202 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1989

    Associates v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Foods v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    78 Ohio St. 3d 459 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 21, 1997

    According to New Boston Coke Corp. v. … Co. v. Axe (1982), 5 Ohio Misc.2d 1, 8 , 5 OBR 53, 61, 449 N.E.2d 43, 51 ; Thomas v. Columbus (1987), 39 Ohio App.3d 53, 55-56 , 528 N.E.2d 1274, 1277 . In Queen City Valves, Inc. v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Leonard v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    148 Ohio St. 419 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1947

    In the case of Copeland v. … In the case of Jacobs v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Farmer v. Kelleys Island Board of Education

    69 Ohio St. 3d 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1994

    Justus v. Broum (1975), 42 Ohio St.2d 53 , 71 O.O.2d 35 , 325 N.E.2d 884 , paragraph one of syllabus. If this were the intent of the General Assembly, it would have expressly said so. … II Farmer also contends that we should order the board to reemploy her because the board did not follow the proper evaluation procedures required by R.C. 3319.111.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Rhodes

    46 Ohio St. 2d 33 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1976

    In view of this court’s decision in Maloney v. Rhodes (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 319 , the instant cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as being moot. Cause dismissed. O’Neill,, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Middleton v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    74 Ohio St. 3d 226 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1996

    Complainants must fully comply with R.C. 5715.19 and 5715.13 before a county board of revision may act on their claims. Stanjim Co. v. Mahoning Cty. … R.C. 1.51; see Leach v. Collins (1931), 123 Ohio St. 530, 533 , 176 N.E. 77, 78 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Ratner v. Stark County Board of Revision

    35 Ohio St. 3d 26 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1988

    Brown, in Bd. of Revision v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Locher and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

    Overruled in part by Berea City School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision, 106 Ohio St. 3d 269 (2005)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Haig v. Ohio State Board of Education

    62 Ohio St. 3d 507 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1992

    Brown, J. This case presents three issues: (1) whether the state board was a proper party to the R.C. … It is the local board which initially determines whether it is unreasonable to provide that transportation. See Hartley v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Brown Cty. Bd. of Health v. Raichyk

    137 Ohio St. 3d 1444 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 2013

    Brown App. No. CA2012-06-011, 2013-Ohio-1727 . On motion for reconsideration and clarification. Motion denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Howard v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    37 Ohio St. 3d 195 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1988

    Assn. v. Bd. of Revision (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 13 , 73 O.O. 2d 83, 336 N.E. 2d 433 , as follows: “2. The Board of Tax Appeals is not required to adopt the valuation fixed by any expert or witness. * * * ' “3. … Brown, JJ., concur. Locher and Douglas, JJ., concur in judgment only.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Citizens Building Co. v. Board of Revision

    141 Ohio St. 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1943

    The Board of Revision of Cuyahoga, county upon hearing found the true value to he the same as assessed. … This court has no power to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals but determines only whether the valuation fixed by that board is reasonable and lawful.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Nolan v. Brown

    3 Ohio Law. Abs. 674 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1925

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Brunswick Education Ass'n

    61 Ohio St. 2d 290 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1980

    State v. Western Union Telegraph Co. (1951), 154 Ohio St. 511 ; State, ex rel. Lieux, v. Westlake (1951), 154 Ohio St. 412 ; State, ex rel. Herbert, v. Ferguson (1944), 142 Ohio St. 496 . … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. W. Brown, J., dissents. R.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. O'Grady v. Brown

    47 Ohio St. 2d 265 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1976

    Hubbell, v. Bettman (1931), 124 Ohio St. 24 . Although the proposed amendments herein contain multiple provisions, each of the amendments contains one general purpose. … Brown and. P. Brown, JJ„ concur,.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dircksen v. Greene County Board of Revision

    109 Ohio St. 3d 470 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2006

    (Emphasis sic.) {¶ 4} The Dircksens appealed the decision of the Greene County Board of Revision to the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”). … State v. Hairston, 101 Ohio St.3d 308 , 2004-Ohio-969 , 804 N.E.2d 471 . In paragraph two of the syllabus of Slingluff v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Counts v. Brown

    28 Ohio St. 2d 132 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1971

    Pomeroy, v. … Eges, v. Corlett (1940), 137 Ohio St. 19 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Amsdell v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

    69 Ohio St. 3d 572 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1994

    The BTA, citing Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. Limbach (1989), 42 Ohio St.3d 121 , 537 N.E.2d 1302 , and Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark Cty. … We have previously disabused the BTA regarding its conclusion that “ * * * ‘the board [of revisiones finding of value is entitled to a presumption of validity.’ ” Springfield Local Bd. of Edn. v. Summit Cty.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • State Employment Relations Board v. Miami University

    71 Ohio St. 3d 351 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1994

    Relations Bd. v. Adena Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 485, 496-499 , 613 N.E.2d 605, 613-615 . See, also, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … Trucks, Inc. v. Natl. Labor Relations Bd. (C.A.6, 1983), 699 F.2d 815 ; Orion Corp. v. Natl. Labor Relations Bd. (C.A.7, 1975), 515 F.2d 81 ; Natl. Labor Relations Bd. v. Dayton Motels, Inc.

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.