Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.37s
Brodie v. Summit County Children Services Board
51 Ohio St. 3d 112 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1990
In Harlow v. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 56 timesPublishedUrsuline Academy v. Board of Tax Appeals
141 Ohio St. 563 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1943
See Gerke, Treas., v. Purcell, 25 Ohio St., 229 . However, as pointed out in Wehrle Foundation v. … See, also, ibid, pp. 100, 122 and 11 American Jurisprudence, 642, 690. *572 In the case of Turnverein “Lincoln” v. Board of Appeals, 358 Ill., 135 , 192 N.
Overruled in part, on other grounds by Denison University v. Board of Tax Appeals, 2 Ohio St. 2d 17 (1965)Cited 24 timesPublishedZindle v. Summit County Board of Revision
44 Ohio St. 3d 202 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1989
Associates v. Cuyahoga Cty. … Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Cited 20 timesPublishedFoods v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
78 Ohio St. 3d 459 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 21, 1997
According to New Boston Coke Corp. v. … Co. v. Axe (1982), 5 Ohio Misc.2d 1, 8 , 5 OBR 53, 61, 449 N.E.2d 43, 51 ; Thomas v. Columbus (1987), 39 Ohio App.3d 53, 55-56 , 528 N.E.2d 1274, 1277 . In Queen City Valves, Inc. v.
Cited 41 timesPublishedLeonard v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
148 Ohio St. 419 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1947
In the case of Copeland v. … In the case of Jacobs v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedFarmer v. Kelleys Island Board of Education
69 Ohio St. 3d 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1994
Justus v. Broum (1975), 42 Ohio St.2d 53 , 71 O.O.2d 35 , 325 N.E.2d 884 , paragraph one of syllabus. If this were the intent of the General Assembly, it would have expressly said so. … II Farmer also contends that we should order the board to reemploy her because the board did not follow the proper evaluation procedures required by R.C. 3319.111.
Cited 18 timesPublished46 Ohio St. 2d 33 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1976
In view of this court’s decision in Maloney v. Rhodes (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 319 , the instant cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as being moot. Cause dismissed. O’Neill,, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMiddleton v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
74 Ohio St. 3d 226 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1996
Complainants must fully comply with R.C. 5715.19 and 5715.13 before a county board of revision may act on their claims. Stanjim Co. v. Mahoning Cty. … R.C. 1.51; see Leach v. Collins (1931), 123 Ohio St. 530, 533 , 176 N.E. 77, 78 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedRatner v. Stark County Board of Revision
35 Ohio St. 3d 26 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1988
Brown, in Bd. of Revision v. … Brown, JJ., concur. Locher and Douglas, JJ., dissent.
Overruled in part by Berea City School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision, 106 Ohio St. 3d 269 (2005)Cited 11 timesPublishedHaig v. Ohio State Board of Education
62 Ohio St. 3d 507 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1992
Brown, J. This case presents three issues: (1) whether the state board was a proper party to the R.C. … It is the local board which initially determines whether it is unreasonable to provide that transportation. See Hartley v.
Cited 47 timesPublishedBrown Cty. Bd. of Health v. Raichyk
137 Ohio St. 3d 1444 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 2013
Brown App. No. CA2012-06-011, 2013-Ohio-1727 . On motion for reconsideration and clarification. Motion denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHoward v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
37 Ohio St. 3d 195 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1988
Assn. v. Bd. of Revision (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 13 , 73 O.O. 2d 83, 336 N.E. 2d 433 , as follows: “2. The Board of Tax Appeals is not required to adopt the valuation fixed by any expert or witness. * * * ' “3. … Brown, JJ., concur. Locher and Douglas, JJ., concur in judgment only.
Cited 31 timesPublishedCitizens Building Co. v. Board of Revision
141 Ohio St. 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1943
The Board of Revision of Cuyahoga, county upon hearing found the true value to he the same as assessed. … This court has no power to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals but determines only whether the valuation fixed by that board is reasonable and lawful.
Cited 6 timesPublished3 Ohio Law. Abs. 674 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1925
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Brunswick Education Ass'n
61 Ohio St. 2d 290 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1980
State v. Western Union Telegraph Co. (1951), 154 Ohio St. 511 ; State, ex rel. Lieux, v. Westlake (1951), 154 Ohio St. 412 ; State, ex rel. Herbert, v. Ferguson (1944), 142 Ohio St. 496 . … Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. W. Brown, J., dissents. R.
Cited 20 timesPublishedState ex rel. O'Grady v. Brown
47 Ohio St. 2d 265 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1976
Hubbell, v. Bettman (1931), 124 Ohio St. 24 . Although the proposed amendments herein contain multiple provisions, each of the amendments contains one general purpose. … Brown and. P. Brown, JJ„ concur,.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDircksen v. Greene County Board of Revision
109 Ohio St. 3d 470 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2006
(Emphasis sic.) {¶ 4} The Dircksens appealed the decision of the Greene County Board of Revision to the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”). … State v. Hairston, 101 Ohio St.3d 308 , 2004-Ohio-969 , 804 N.E.2d 471 . In paragraph two of the syllabus of Slingluff v.
Cited 6 timesPublished28 Ohio St. 2d 132 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1971
Pomeroy, v. … Eges, v. Corlett (1940), 137 Ohio St. 19 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmsdell v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
69 Ohio St. 3d 572 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1994
The BTA, citing Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. Limbach (1989), 42 Ohio St.3d 121 , 537 N.E.2d 1302 , and Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark Cty. … We have previously disabused the BTA regarding its conclusion that “ * * * ‘the board [of revisiones finding of value is entitled to a presumption of validity.’ ” Springfield Local Bd. of Edn. v. Summit Cty.
Cited 38 timesPublishedState Employment Relations Board v. Miami University
71 Ohio St. 3d 351 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1994
Relations Bd. v. Adena Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 485, 496-499 , 613 N.E.2d 605, 613-615 . See, also, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … Trucks, Inc. v. Natl. Labor Relations Bd. (C.A.6, 1983), 699 F.2d 815 ; Orion Corp. v. Natl. Labor Relations Bd. (C.A.7, 1975), 515 F.2d 81 ; Natl. Labor Relations Bd. v. Dayton Motels, Inc.
Cited 18 timesPublished
Ask Donna