Case law

Christy v. Summit County Board of Elections

77 Ohio St. 3d 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1996

Williams v. Brown (1977), 52 Ohio St.2d 13, 19-20 , 6 O.O.3d 79, 83 , 368 N.E.2d 838, 842 ; State ex rel. Turpin Woods Co. v. Hamilton Cty. … X(9), we will not consider it and we will presume the regularity of the board’s determination. Cf. Gaskins v.

Denison University v. Board of Tax Appeals

2 Ohio St. 2d 17 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1965

Thus, Western Reserve Academy v. Board of Tax Appecds (1950), 153 Ohio St. 133 , 91 N. … Although the opinion in Denison University v. Board of Tax Appeals (1962), 173 Ohio St. 429 , 183 N.

Marrek v. Cleveland Metroparks Board of Commissioners

9 Ohio St. 3d 194 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1984

Furthermore, sovereign immunity has been abolished for school boards, Carbone v. Overfield (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 212 ; for counties, Zents v. … Brown, Sweeney, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Locher, J., concurs in judgment only. Holmes, J., not participating.

Ratner v. Stark County Board of Revision

23 Ohio St. 3d 59 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1986

Neither the board of revision nor the taxpayer urges that the provisions of R.C. 5713.03 are absolutely determinative of this appeal. … Brown, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., Locher and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

Markus v. Trumbull County Board of Elections

22 Ohio St. 2d 197 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 27, 1970

Dillon v. Cleveland (1927), 117 Ohio St. 258 , 158 N. E. 606 . See Shyrock v. Zanesville (1915), 92 Ohio St. 375 , 110 N. E. 937 ; State, ex rel. Poor, v. Addison (1937), 132 Ohio St. 477 , 9 N. E. 2d 148 . … This court, in Prosen v. Duffy (1949), 152 Ohio St. 139 , 87 N.

State ex rel. Brown v. Court of Common Pleas

23 Ohio St. 3d 46 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1986

Jackson (1980), 64 Ohio St. 2d 107 [ 18 O.O.3d 348 ], and State v. Kapper (1983), 5 Ohio St. 3d 36 . Those cases do not support respondent’s contention. … Accordingly, the writ of mandamus is allowed on authority of State v. Mapson, supra. Writ allowed. Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Wynwood Apartments, Inc. v. Board of Revision

59 Ohio St. 2d 34 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1979

The decision of the board being neither unreasonable nor unlawful is affirmed. Decision affirmed. Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Looher and Holmes, JJ., concur. … In Springfield Marine Bank v. Property Tax Appeal Board (1970), 44 Ill. 2d 428 , 256 N.

Clermont County ADAMH Board v. Hogan

79 Ohio St. 3d 358 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1997

boards of the state. … Cooper v. Savord (1950), 153 Ohio St. 367 , 41 O.O. 396 , 92 N.E.2d 390 , paragraph one of the syllabus; Gulf Oil Corp. v.

White v. Clinton County Board of Commissioners

76 Ohio St. 3d 416 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1996

As the court stated in Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. … In Cox Broadcasting Corp. v.

Snyder v. State Liability Board of Awards

94 Ohio St. 342 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1916

But it is urged that when the board on August 11, 1913, held that no further compensation was due and the case was closed, that was the “final action” of the board within the meaning of the statute and was a denial of the … This case was certified to this court upon the ground that the judgment was in conflict with that pronounced in the case of Sam Police v. The State Industrial Commission of Ohio, 23 C. C., N. S., 433.

Kontner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

148 Ohio St. 614 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1947

See Baker v. Powhatan Mining Co., 146 Ohio St., 600 , 67 N. E. (2d), 714. … Jacobs v. Office of Unemployment Compensation & Placement, supra.

Board of Edn. v. Sever-Williams Co.

22 Ohio St. 2d 107 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 6, 1970

He informally discussed the question of error with a representative of the firm of architects employed by the board of education, but did not discuss the matter with the board. … Colella v. Allegheny County, 391 Pa. 103 , 137 A. 2d 265 . The legislative intent which prompted the passage of R.

Cleveland Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

70 Ohio St. 3d 73 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1994

Olmsted Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1990), 54 Ohio St.3d 98, 99 , 561 N.E.2d 915, 917 . As we said in R.R.Z. Assoc. v. Cuyahoga *75 Cty. … Moreover, under Banbury Village, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Stewart v. Trumbull County Board of Elections

34 Ohio St. 2d 129 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1973

See, e. g., Katz v. Dept. of Liquor Control (1957), 166 Ohio St. 229 , 232, 141 N. E. 2d 294 . … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Gammarino v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

71 Ohio St. 3d 388 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1994

Gammarino, Appellee, v. Hamilton County Board of Revision; Rhodes, Auditor, Appellant. [Cite as Gammarino v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision (1994), Ohio St.3d .] … Appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 92-B-1402.

Walters v. Knox County Board of Revision

47 Ohio St. 3d 23 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1989

This court held in Ratner v. Stark Cty. … “The Board of Tax Appeals is not required to adopt the valuation fixed by an expert or witness. * * *” (Citations omitted.) Cardinal Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Jurcisin v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

35 Ohio St. 3d 137 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1988

Williams, v. Brown (1977), 52 Ohio St. 2d 13, 19 ; State, ex rel. Commrs. of the Sinking Fund, v. Brown (1957), 167 Ohio St. 71 .” … Cramer, v. Brown (1983), 7 Ohio St. 3d 5, 6 , 7 OBR 317, 318, 454 N.E. 2d 1321, 1322 , citing Pfeifer v. Graves (1913), 88 Ohio St. 473 , 104 N.E. 529 , paragraph five of the syllabus; Weinland v.

Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education

99 Ohio St. 3d 48 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 16, 2003

II consistent with Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn., 97 Ohio St.3d 451 , 2002-Ohio-6718 , 780 N.E.2d 543 . Robert J. Vecchio Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Vecchio, for appellants. Lutz & Oxley Co., L.P.A., Fred M.

Paschal v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

74 Ohio St. 3d 141 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1995

State ex rel Citizens for a Better Beachwood v. Cuyahoga Cty. … subsequent to seventy-five days after the auditor or clerk certifies the sufficiency and validity of the initiative petition to the board of elections.” .

Simmons v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

81 Ohio St. 3d 47 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1998

This court is not a “ ‘super Board of Tax Appeals’ ” and does not sit as a trier of fact “de novo.” Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Mahoning Cty. … Investors, L.P. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 547 , 660 N.E.2d 467 , the BTA rejected the taxpayer’s evidence of value and approved the board of revision’s valuation.