Case law

United States ex rel. Scott v. Mancusi

299 F. Supp. 453 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 28, 1969

There is more to this case than mere surprise at the severity of a sentence [United States v. Shneer, 194 F.2d 598, 600 (3d Cir. 1952)], or the opinion of defense counsel of the likely sentence [United States v. … Finn v. Klein, 271 F.Supp. 513 (S.D.N.Y.1967)].

Russell v. Monroe

351 F. Supp. 115 · District Court, W.D. New York · Nov 9, 1972

Citing Britt v. … Wilson v. McMann, 408 F.2d 896 (2d Cir. 1969), for in a habeas corpus proceeding the defense of res adjudicata is not available. See Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 506-508 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953).

The North Star

108 F. 436 · District Court, W.D. New York · Apr 6, 1901

C.) 20 Fed. 322 ; Steamship Co. v. Smith, 20 C. C. A. 419 , 74 Fed. 267 ; The Clement, Fed. Cas. No. 2,879. And again, in The Lansdowne, a case recently decided, and reported in (D. … This is denied by the master of the *443 Siemens and oilier witnesses on board the Siemens and Holley. The Siemens had proceeded in her usual and ordinary course.

Weidmann v. U.S. Department of Treasury

713 F. Supp. 569 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 3, 1989

He is a member of the Editorial Advisory Board, Taxation for Accountants; a member of the Advisory Board of Tax Analysts; a member of the United States Income Tax Advisory Board; and an advisory board member of accountants … No. 94-658, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 278, reprinted in [1976] U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 2897, 3174; Swart v.

Yan Zhao v. United States

273 F. Supp. 3d 372 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 4, 2017

v. … The Court further notes that Plaintiff made inaccurate statements on an Affidavit of Financial Resources submitted to the New York State Crime Victims Board (hereinafter the “Crime Victims Board”) in September 2004.

In re Fitzhugh Hall Amusement Co.

228 F. 169 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 11, 1915

Morris v. Rexford, 18 N. Y. 552, 557 ; Fields v. Bland, 81 N. Y. 239 . … This principle was recognized by the Supreme Court in First National Bank of Baltimore v. Staake, supra, even prior to the amendment of 1910, where, in the opinion of the court, delivered by Mr. Justice Brown ( 202 U.

Totalplan Corp. of America v. Lure Camera Ltd.

613 F. Supp. 451 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 31, 1985

See, also, Leroy v. … Co. v.

Spirella Co. v. McGowan

52 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 23, 1943

In accordance with the rule set forth in Texas Co. v. Higgins, and Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. … See Jones v. Goodson, 10 Cir., 121 F.2d 176 ; United States v. Griswold, 1 Cir., 124 F.2d 599 ; Anglim v. Empire Star Mines Co., Ltd., 9 Cir., 129 F.2d 914 ; Indian Refining Co. v.

Falso v. Gates Chili Central School District

680 F. Supp. 2d 465 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 26, 2010

See generally Miller v. Int’l Tel. & Tel. … Corbett v. Bank of Cal. Int’l, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8855 at *13 (S.D.N.Y.1993). See also Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 11(c); Safir v.

Ellis v. Dretke

456 F. Supp. 2d 421 · District Court, W.D. New York · Oct 16, 2006

See Maleng v. … Maleng v.

Bauer v. Foley

287 F. Supp. 343 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 15, 1968

See Pfeffer v. Commissioner of Int. Rev., 272 F.2d 383 (2d Cir. 1959); Brown v. Lethert, 360 F.2d 560 (8th Cir. 1966). The same is true of the notice requirement of section 6303(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. … Botta v. Scanlon, supra, at 394 ; Enochs v. Williams Packing & Nav. Co., 370 U.S. at 7 , 82 S.Ct. 1125 . Helvey v.

Phillips v. Carborundum Company

361 F. Supp. 1016 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jul 24, 1973

The action in Hodgson v. Carborundum Company (now Brennan v. … See Hodgson v. Board of Education of Parsippany-Troy Hills, 344 F.Supp. 79, 86 (D.N.J.1972). Carborundum’s motion for the joinder of the National and Local Unions as parties is denied.

Frentzel v. Mohr

District Court, W.D. New York · Apr 24, 2025

(quoting Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 (1974)). … For example, in Clingman v.

Feine v. McGowan

97 F. Supp. 48 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 22, 1949

United States v. Felt & Tarrant Co., 283 U.S. 269 , 51 S.Ct. 376 , 75 L.Ed. 1025 ; United States *50 v. Henry Prentiss & Co., 288 U.S. 73 , 53 S.Ct. 283 , 77 L.Ed. 626 . … Evans v. Rothensies, 3 Cir., 114 F.2d 958 .

Letizia v. Flynn

District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 18, 2020

The “erroneous information” provided to the courts and parole board “prejudiced” him “in both legal litigation and at [his] parole board hearing.” … See McKithen v. Brown, 626 F.3d 143, 154 (2d Cir. 2010).

Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Seneca County

260 F. Supp. 3d 290 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 2, 2017

Brown, 481 F.3d 89, 105 (2d Cir. 2007) (“Importantly, we have also cautioned that issue preclusion 'will apply only if it is quite clear that these requirements have been satisfied, lest a party be precluded from obtaining … We therefore agree with the district court that the parties in the two actions [ (A Board of Education and board members sued in their official capacities) ] are in privity for purposes, of res judicata.”)

New York v. Solvent Chemical Co., Inc.

235 F. Supp. 2d 238 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 3, 2002

Solvent also cites Tippins Inc. v. USX Corp., 37 F.3d 87 (3d Cir.1994), and Owen Electric Steel Co. v. … RSR Corp. v.

Donovan v. Briggs

250 F. Supp. 2d 242 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 26, 2003

Schwabenbauer v. Board of Educ. of Olean, 667 F.2d 305, 314 (2d Cir.1981). … Rogers v. City of Amsterdam, 303 F.3d 155, 158-59 (2d Cir.2002) (quoting Cerrone v. Brown, 246 F.3d 194, 202 (2d Cir.2001)).

Malcolm v. Honeoye Falls-Lima Central School District

278 F. Supp. 3d 677 · District Court, W.D. New York · Oct 3, 2017

See generally Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust C. v. … See Malcolm v. Bd. of Educ., 08-CV-6577 (Dkt. # 41).

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Standard Milling Co.

508 F. Supp. 277 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 18, 1981

See, also, Locust Cartage Co. v. … Co. v. Golden Triangle Etc., supra; Locust Cartage Co. v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc., supra.