Case law

Mader Construction Corp. v. United States Department of Labor

607 F. Supp. 459 · District Court, W.D. New York · Apr 12, 1985

FTC v. … See McKeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Eisen v. Eastman, 421 F.2d 560 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 841 , 91 S.Ct. 82 , 27 L.Ed.2d 75 (1970); White v.

Godson v. Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C.

285 F.R.D. 255 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 11, 2012

Corp. v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Board of Trs. of Bldg. Serv. 32B-J Pension Fund, 392 F.Supp.2d 434, 446 (E.D.N.Y.2005) (“[C]ourts have broad discretion in applying their local rules.”).

United States ex rel. Albro v. Karnuth

31 F.2d 785 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 23, 1927

S. v. Williams (C. … Falco v. Williams (C. C.) 191 F. 1001 , U. S. ex rel. Chin Fook Wah v. Dunton (D. C.) 288 F. 959 , and U. S. v. Greenawalt (D. C.) 213 F. 901 .

Bijur Motor Lighting Co. v. Eclipse Mach. Co.

237 F. 89 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jul 14, 1916

such acts had been specifically authorized by the board. … Whitaker v. Richards, 134 Pa. 191 , 19 Atl. 501 , 7 L. R. A. 749, 19 Am. St. Rep. 684 ; Cutter v. Whittemore, 10 Mass. 442 ; Dillon v. Anderson, 43 N. Y. 231 .

Seaboard Forwarding Co. v. Freight on Certain Cargoes of Flaxseed

16 F.2d 154 · District Court, W.D. New York · Oct 28, 1926

Davidson v. Green (D. C.) 127 F. 999 ; United Transp. Co. v. New York Transp. Lines, 185 F. 386 , 107 C. C. A. 442 ; Castner v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 5 F.(2d) 214 . … Campbell v. Conner, 70 N. Y. 424 .

ANTKOWIAK BY ANTKOWIAK v. Ambach

621 F. Supp. 975 · District Court, W.D. New York · Nov 4, 1985

See Riley v. Ambach, 668 F.2d 635 (2d Cir.1981). Plaintiff claims that exhaustion is not required in this case. … An appeal to the commissioner of education will lie from any determination of the board of education. Honorable John T. Elfvin of this court addressed a similar claim in Smith v. Ambach, CIV-80-1086E (August 21, 1981).

Cipriano v. Bd. of Educ. of North Tonawanda, NY

700 F. Supp. 1199 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 16, 1988

Henn v. … In Geller v.

United States v. Millio

588 F. Supp. 45 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jun 13, 1984

He now moves to suppress the Browning 9 *46 mm. automatic pistol which was seized from a car he was driving on February 2, 1984. … United States v. Lefkowitz, 285 U.S. 452, 467 , 52 S.Ct. 420, 424 , 76 L.Ed. 877 (1932); Taglavore v. United States, 291 F.2d 262, 265 (9th Cir.1961); cf., United States v.

Douglass v. Rochester City School District

873 F. Supp. 2d 507 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jul 5, 2012

See Gould v. … See e.g., Krasner v.

United States Ex Rel. Coleman v. Smith

395 F. Supp. 1155 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jun 17, 1975

Morrissey v. Brewer 408 U.S. 471, 482 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). See also United States ex rel. Johnson v. New York State Board of Parole, 500 F.2d 925 (2d Cir. 1974). … Santos v. New York State Board of Parole, supra, the parole officer, acting on a prior belief of a parole violation, secured a parole violation warrant.

Threat v. Russi

784 F. Supp. 65 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 20, 1992

In a 1986 case, Freeman v. … In Freeman v.

Ward v. New York

291 F. Supp. 2d 188 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 19, 2003

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Pataki 320 F.3d 200 (2d Cir.2003). … Brown & Williamson, 320 F.3d at 214 .

Cary v. United States

22 F.2d 298 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 11, 1927

When this case was before me last October (Cary v. U. … S. v. 99 Diamonds (C. C. A.) 139 F. 961 , 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 185. And in the Rodenbough Appeal, decided by the United States Board of Tax Appeals, 1 B. T.

In re Muskoka Lumber Co.

127 F. 886 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 9, 1904

St. 1901, p. 3444]) is clear and explicit, and, as said in Bray v. Cobb, 3 Am. Bankr. R. 792, 100 Fed. 270 , more than limits the time in which claims against the bankrupt estate may be proved. See In re Moebius, 8 Am. … R. 590, 116 Fed. 47 ; In re Brown, 10 Am. Bankr. R. 388, 123 Fed. 336 .

United States v. Urlacher

136 F.R.D. 550 · District Court, W.D. New York · Apr 2, 1991

United States v. Brown, 535 F.2d at 429 n. 3. See 8 J. Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice 1116.01[4][a] at 16-15, 16-19, 1116.01[4][e] at 16-36, 1116.02[2][c] at 16-44 (2d ed. 1986). … United States v. Brown, supra, cited by defendant, concerned the Rule 16 protection of each party’s witness list from disclosure, and the Rule 17(b) protection of an “indigent defendant’s” witness subpoenas.

Ingle v. Gage

52 F.2d 738 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 25, 1931

Liberty Baking Co. v. Heiner (D. C.) 34 F. (2d) 513; Parkersburg Iron & Steel Co. v. Burnet, supra; Milwaukee Woven Wire Works v. Commissioner, 16 B. T. A. 75. … Neither before the Commissioner nor the Board of Tax Appeals was any question raised regarding this. Vide Royal Packing Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 536 ; De Loss v. Commissioner (C. C.

Avgerinos v. Palmyra-Macedon Central School District

690 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 11, 2010

Kopec v. Coughlin, 922 F.2d 152, 154-55 (2d Cir.1991) (quoting Fonte v. Board of Managers of Continental Towers Condominium, 848 F.2d 24, 25 (2d Cir.1988)) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Friedl v. … As this Court noted in Donlon v. Board of Education of Greece Central Sch.

Douglas-Pectin Corp. v. Armour & Co.

21 F.2d 584 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 1, 1927

Douglas Pectin Corp. v. Armour & Co. (D. C.) 14 F.(2d) 768 .' An examination of the affidavits does not disclose to the satisfaction of the court that error was committed in Molding said patent valid and infringed. … Browne’s testimony or upon any. lack of his expert knowledge.

Harris v. United States

333 F. Supp. 3d 238 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 21, 2018

Martinez v. Long Island Jewish Hillside Med. Ctr. , 70 N.Y.2d 697 , 699, 518 N.Y.S.2d 955 , 512 N.E.2d 538 (1987) ; Brown v. N.Y.C. Health and Hosps. Corp. , 225 A.D.2d 36 , 44, 648 N.Y.S.2d 880 (2d Dep't 1996). … In Brown v. N.Y.C. Health and Hosps. Corp. , the court held that the defendants were not entitled to summary judgment because there was evidence of actual exposure. 225 A.D.2d at 48 , 648 N.Y.S.2d 880 .

In re Oryell

28 F.2d 639 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 31, 1928

Silverthom Lumber Co. v. U. S., 251 U. S. 385 , 40 S. Ct. 182 , 64 L. Ed. 319 . In Castro v. U. S. (C. C. … S. v. Specified Quantity of Int. Liquors (C. C. A.) 7 F.(2d) 835 ; while in Wagner v. U. S. (C. C.