Case law

Doyle v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 23, 2024

Telenor Mobile Commc’ns AS v. … Brown v. City of S. Burlington, Vt., 393 F.3d 337, 343 (2d Cir. 2004) (emphasis added) (citing 17A Am. Jur .2d Contracts § 11 (2004)).

Bonerb v. Richard J. Caron Foundation

159 F.R.D. 16 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 21, 1994

Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c); Oliner v. McBride’s, supra; see also Middle Atlantic Utilities Co. v. S.M.W. Dev. Corp., 392 F.2d 380, 385 (2d Cir.1968); Aequitron Medical, Inc. v. … Defendant contends that it will be unduly prejudiced by the amendment because it will have to return to the drawing board to prepare an entirely new defense.

Strine v. Marion Central School District

280 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 18, 2003

DiCarlo, 62 F.Supp.2d 780, 785-86 (S.D.N.Y.1999); Brown v. City of New York, 869 F.Supp. 158, 171 (S.D.N.Y.1994). … Vital v. Interfaith Med. Ctr., 168 F.3d 615, 619 (2d Cir.1999) (quoting Eggleston v.

Bender v. City of Rochester, NY

588 F. Supp. 1405 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 9, 1984

In support of his position, plaintiff relies upon Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, 339 U.S. 306, 313 , 70 S.Ct. 652, 656 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950) and Mennonite Board of Missions v. … See Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112 , 77 S.Ct. 200 , 1 L.Ed.2d 178 (1956); Schroeder v. City of New York, 371 U.S. 208 , 83 S.Ct. 279 , 9 L.Ed.2d 255 (1962); Greene v.

Levine v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

529 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 28, 1981

See Eisman v. Mathews, 428 F.Supp. 877 (D.Md.1977); Burt v. Secretary of HEW, CCH Medicare & Medicaid Rptr. ¶ 29, 624 (E.D.Cal.1979); Hardy v. Matthews, Medicare & Medicaid Rptr., ¶ 28,031 (N.D.Cal.1977). … See Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358, 368-69 , 66 S.Ct. 637, 642-43 , 90 L.Ed. 718 (1946). At the time the Gerstman case was decided, the Secretary had the right to appeal the decision.

Homer White, Inc. v. United States

281 F. Supp. 436 · District Court, W.D. New York · Mar 14, 1968

Verbeem v. United States, 154 F.Supp. 431, 433 (E.D.Mich.1957), aff’d per curiam sub. nom., Amlin v. Verbeem, 356 U.S. 676 , 78 S.Ct. 1006 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1958). … in such State having authority to grant or approve such certificates and if such carrier has obtained such certificate from such board.

Easley v. United States

719 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 12, 1989

Abelson, 620 F.2d 339, 348 (2d Cir.1980) (quoting Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078 (2d Cir.1977)) (emphasis added by court). … United States v. Alcea Band of Tillamooks, 341 U.S. 48, 49 , 71 S.Ct. 552, 553 , 95 L.Ed. 738 (1951); Library of Congress v. Shaw, 478 U.S. 310, 311 , 106 S.Ct. 2957, 2959 , 92 L.Ed.2d 250 (1986); Arvin v.

Gatson v. Coughlin

679 F. Supp. 270 · District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 17, 1988

In Hodge v. … Bryan v. Werner, 516 F.2d 233, 240 (3d Cir.1975), citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Withey v. Perales

752 F. Supp. 569 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 25, 1990

See Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807 , 100 S.Ct. 2486 , 65 L.Ed.2d 532 (1980); Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980). … See Board of Regents v. Tomanio, supra, 446 U.S. at 487 , 100 S.Ct. at 1796 . As the Court announced in United States v.

Patterson v. Ludlow

District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 10, 2021

Parole board officials “are entitled to absolute immunity from suit for damages when they serve a quasi-adjudicative function in deciding whether to grant, deny[,] or revoke parole.” Montero v. … In other words, Patterson challenges the parole board commissioners’ conduct in deciding whether to grant him parole. This conduct is “precisely the type to which absolute immunity . .. applifes].” See Trueluck v.

Austral Sales Corp. v. Jamestown Metal Equipment Co.

41 F. Supp. 508 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 20, 1941

As was said in Suffolk Company v. … Merrell v. Powdered Milk Co., supra; Austin-Western Road Machinery Co. v. Disc Grader & Plow Co., 8 Cir., 291 F. 301 ; Collins et al. v. Hupp Motor Car Corporation, 6 Cir., 22 F.2d 27 ; Standard Brands, Inc. v.

Woodworth v. United States

287 F. Supp. 3d 345 · District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 27, 2017

Logue v. Velez , 92 N.Y.2d 13 , 17, 677 N.Y.S.2d 6 , 699 N.E.2d 365 (1998). See also Francis v. … Kawache v.

Inoa v. Dziduch

District Court, W.D. New York · Dec 26, 2024

See Smith v. Carroll, 602 F. Supp. 2d 521, 526 (D. Del. 2009). … Id.; accord Brown v. United States, 74 F. App’x 611, 614 (7th Cir. 2003) (court properly denied indigent inmate’s 1 In his motion, plaintiff cites Section 3121 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules.

Whalen v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

569 F. Supp. 2d 327 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 6, 2008

See e.g., 29 C.F.R. § 541.704 ; Donovan v. … See Bennett v. Progressive Corp., 225 F.Supp.2d 190, 215 (N.D.N.Y.2002); Bandhan v. Lab. Corp. of America, 234 F.Supp.2d 313 , 316 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y.2002). See generally Brown v.

Fairman v. Hurley

373 F. Supp. 2d 227 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jun 22, 2005

Jorgensen v. … Pearson v. Board of Educ. of City of New York, No. 02 Civ. 3629, 2004 WL 2297354 , *4 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2004); Olympus Corp. v.

Head v. Artus

District Court, W.D. New York · Feb 20, 2024

Robinson v. Concentra Health Servs., Inc., 781 F.3d 42, 44 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir. 2011)). … See Brown v. Jones, No. 15-CV-6108-EAW-MJP, 2021 WL 6427601, at *6 (W.D.N.Y.

Buckeye Incubator Co. v. Model Incubator Co.

237 F. 883 · District Court, W.D. New York · Nov 15, 1916

There are many adjudications, of which Rathbone, Sard & Co. v. Champion Range Co., 189 Fed. 26 , 110 C. C. A. 596 , 37 L. R. A. (N. … In this situation, and upon the point under discussion, the principle enunciated by Judge Hough in Steiff v. Bind, 215 Fed. 204 , is of interest.

United States v. Rowin

550 F. Supp. 643 · District Court, W.D. New York · Nov 15, 1982

See, Johnson v. … It is clear from the statement of plaintiff’s counsel that prompt recourse to the second level of review before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals was precluded by the Government’s failure to advise defendant of its decision,

United States v. Houde Engineering Corp.

9 F. Supp. 841 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jan 25, 1935

Canneries v. United States, 55 App. D. C. 36, 299 F. 908 ; United States v. Terminal Railroad Ass’n of St. Louis, 236 U. S. 194 , 35 S. Ct. 408 , 59 L. Ed. 535 ; Trimble v. John C. Winston Co. (C. C. … R. 1238, was an action brought by the Minimum Wage Board for violation of the Minimum Wage Law. Arizona Copper Co. v. Hammer, 250 U. S. 400 , 39 S. Ct. 553 , 63 L. Ed. 1058 , 6 A. L.

Williams v. Blum

513 F. Supp. 753 · District Court, W.D. New York · Apr 24, 1981

Caulfield v. Board, 583 F.2d 605, 610 (2d Cir. 1978) (emphasis in original). See also Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp., 638 F.2d 568 (2d Cir. 1981); Sonesta v. Wellington, 483 F.2d 247, 250 (2d Cir. 1973). … Rothstein v. Wyman, 303 F.Supp. 339, 351 (S.D.N.Y.1969).