Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysurct

1,589 results

1.33s

  • In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Lyden

    64 Misc. 597 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 15, 1909

    In William v. Freeman, 83 N. … In Brown v. Quintard, 177 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Kaphan

    176 Misc. 228 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 4, 1941

    (Govin v. de Miranda, 140 N. Y. 474 ; Miller v. Silverman, 247 id. 447 ; Matter of Cohn, 187 App. Div. 392 .) … (Matter of Brown, 252 N. Y. 366 ; Matter of Brady, 254 id. 590, affg. 228 App. Div. 56 ; Matter of Valentine, 122 Misc. 486 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Sniffin

    177 Misc. 640 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 8, 1941

    International Salt Co., Inc., v. Graves, 267 N. Y. 149 ; People ex rel. Bankers Trust Co. v. Graves , 270 id. 316, 320.) The error herein, however, does not appear to be one of law. … Y. 613 ; Matter of Brown, 172 Misc. 413 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Probate of the Will of Mercer

    207 Misc. 346 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 4, 1955

    The cases of Kip v. Van Cortland ( 7 Hill 346 ) ; Matter of Storms ( 3 Redf. 327 ) ; Brown v. Clark ( 77 N. Y. 369 ) ; Matter of Klein ( 177 Misc. 555 ) and Matter of Knapp (23 N. Y. … In Kip v. Van Cortland (supra), there were passing references to the effect of a codicil indorsed upon a will.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Espenscheid

    140 Misc. 53 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 4, 1931

    (Hodgman v. Cobb, 202 App. Div. 259 ; Brown v. Spohr, 180 N. Y. 201 .) . In the present case the bequest is not made to the executor but is made direct to the beneficiary. … (Johnson v. Lawrence, 95 N. Y. 154 ; McAlpine v. Potter, 126 id. 285 ; Matter of Ziegler, 218 id. 544.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Scott

    5 Misc. 2d 690 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 23, 1956

    (New York City Mission Soc. v. Board of Pensions of Presbyt. Church, 174 Misc. 268 , affd. 261 App. Div. 823 , motion for leave to appeal denied 285 N. Y. 862 ; Matter of Neary, 194 Misc. 200 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Sprague

    4 Mills Surr. 104 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1903

    Supp. 700 , as holding contrary to the views of the court in the ease of Baucus v. … -Suppose that a man and his wife were boarding, and that that had been their mode of living during their married life; that they had no household furniture, they required none; their manner and style of living absolved them

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re the Construction of the Will of Rosman

    19 Misc. 2d 881 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 17, 1959

    A particular clause of a will must be considered in the light shed upon it by reading the will as a whole (Davis v. Crandall, 101 N. … Parol evidence may not be substituted to provide omitted words or to vary the provisions of the will (Matter of Smith, supra; Dwight v. Fancher, 245 N. Y. 71 ; Brown v. Quintard, 177 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Accounting of Grasso

    1 Misc. 2d 704 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 19, 1956

    Co. v. Staten Is. R. T. Ry. Co., 251 N. Y. 127 , affd., 281 U. S. 98 ; Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Colon & Co., 260 N. Y. 305 ; Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Empire Trust Co., 184 Misc. 947 ; Matter of Vleck v. … Y. 371 ; Matter of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, 293 N. Y. 222 ; Matter of Becker v. Marcy State Hosp., 264 App. Div. 643 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Crater

    171 Misc. 732 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 8, 1939

    (Butler v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 225 N. Y. 197, 203 .) … Co., supra; Matter of Board of Education, 173 N. Y. 321 ; Matter of Wagener, 143 App. Div. 286 ; Matter of Katz, 135 Misc. 861 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Clark's Estate

    134 N.Y.S. 226 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 13, 1911

    BROWN, S. … Following New York African Soc. v. Varick, 13 Johns. 38 , Bailey v. Onondaga County Mut. Ins. Co., 6 Hill, 476 , 41 Am. Dec. 759 , and Newport Mechanics’ Mfg. Co. v. Starbird, 10 N. H. 123, 34 Am. Dec. 145 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Rhoades

    2 Gibb. Surr. 554 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 15, 1898

    Brown v. Richter, 25 App. Div. 239 ; Van Nos- *558 trand v. Marvin, 16 id. 33; Clark v. Cammann, 14 id. 133. … Van Nostrand v. Marvin, Clark v. Cammann and Simonson v. Waller, above cited, treat Savage v. Burnham, 17 N. Y. 561 , and Howland v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Matthiessen

    175 Misc. 466 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 6, 1940

    (Cochran v. Commonwealth, 241 Ky. 656 ; 44 S. W [2d] 603: Foulkes v. Foulkes, 173 Ark. 188 ; 293 S. W. 1 ; Bacon v. Barber, — Vt. —; 6 A. [2d] 9.) … Brown v. Routzahn (63 F. [2d] 914; certiorari denied, 290 U. S. 641 ) was a suit by the Collector of Internal Revenue to recover a tax upon a gift alleged to have been made in contemplation of death.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In re the Guardianship of Clarke

    145 Misc. 660 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 1, 1932

    (Devine v. Melton, 170 App. Div. 280, 282 ; City of New York v. Interborough R. T. Co., 134 Misc. 827, 832 ; Franklin v. Leiter, 149 App. Div. 678, 679 ; O’Grady v. State of New York, 118 Misc. 693, 696 ; Freshman v. … Yulee, 64 id. 449, 452; Silverstein v. Brown, 153 App. Div. 677, 680 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Fowler v. Walter

    1 Dem. Sur. 240 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1883

    Its prayer should be for the appointment of the petitioner himself, and the citation should correspond with the petition, and should issue to all persons having a prior right (see Batchelor v. … Pumpelly v. Tinkham ( 23 Barb., 321 ), cited by counsel for the petitioner, is not at odds with this view.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Cuddeback

    168 Misc. 698 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 31, 1938

    Y. 132 ; Brown v. Cleveland Trust Co., 233 id. 399; Costello v. Costello, 209 id. 252; King v. Talbot, 40 id. 76; Litchfield v. White, 7 id. 438; Matter of Roche, 233 App. Div. 236 ; modfd., 259 N. … Y. 132 ; Crabb v. Young, 92 id. 56.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Zabriskie

    159 Misc. 199 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 24, 1936

    (Carpenter v. Taylor, 164 N. Y. 171 ; Fulton v. Whitney, 66 id. 548; Case v. Carroll, 35 id. 385; Forbes v. Halsey, 26 id. 53; Gardner v. Ogden, 22 id. 327; Terwilliger v. Brown, 44 id. 237; Slater v. Slater, 114 App. … Div. 160 ; Matter of Schroeder No. 1, 113 id. 204 ; Matter of Clift, 135 Misc. 4 ; Johnston v. Johnston, 131 id. 323, 328.) The issue is whether it applies here.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Brown

    183 Misc. 470 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 6, 1944

    In this accounting proceeding of the executors the principal question is raised by an objection of the widow *471 of the decedent, Ada Brown, to the account. The construction of the will is required. … (Pierrepont v. Edwards, 25 N. Y. 128 ; Matter of Vanderbilt, 229 App. Div. 574 , affg. 134 Misc. 574 ; Matter of Whitcomb, 175 Misc. 564 .) The principle of these cases is well expressed in Pierrepont v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Jack

    154 Misc. 617 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 4, 1935

    The rule of law in relation to descent and devise of contract rights is stated in Williams v. Haddock ( 145 N. … Div. 331, at p. 334 ; Williams v. Kinney, supra, which also recites for like holdings, Champion v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 398 , and Griffith v. Beecher, 10 Barb. 432 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Construction of the Will of Shatford

    18 Misc. 2d 953 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 26, 1959

    Div. 888 ; Conway v. Bowe, 116 N. Y. S. 2d 182; Matter of Bowne, 11 Misc 2d 597 ). … Joseph’s Hosp. v. Bennett, 281 N. Y. 115 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.