Case law

In re the Accounting of O'Hagen

1 Misc. 2d 483 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 19, 1955

In Surace v. Danna ( 248 N. … If there be no spouse and no such minor children, the award is to be paid to his dependents or to such of them as the board directs. Up to this point the award is payable directly to the family of the workman.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Crum

18 Mills Surr. 254 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1916

(Catt v. Catt, 118 App. Div. 142 .) In Manice v. Manice, 43 N. … Paragraph 1'21, same chapter: “The board in charge of foundations consists of the priest of the place and the board of aldermen of the city or of the community.”

In re the Estate of Pretino

150 Misc. 2d 371 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 18, 1991

Litig., 102 FRD 468; Moore v Tri-City Hosp. Auth., 118 FRD 646; Solomon v Scientific Am., supra.) … The objectant was available for deposition and can be called as a witness at trial to testify regarding her relationship with her father (Ruggeiro v Board of Educ., 49 Misc 2d 532 ; In re Dayco Corp. Derivative Sec.

In re the Estate of Eakins

170 Misc. 59 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 3, 1939

McDermott v. Board of Police ( 25 Barb. 635 ) held that service of notice of charges against a police officer must be personal, and Rathbun v. Acker ( 18 Barb. 393 ) and City of Glens Falls v. … All of the cited cases with the exception of Herter v. Mullen, Matter of Blumberg, McDermott v. Board of Police and Skinner v. Sullivan fall into this class. This principle has no present applicability.

In re the Estate of Wertheimer

177 Misc. 590 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1941

The Board’s allocation of the dividend to the later period is, we think, plainly correct. ‘All events creating the liability ’ for that dividend had assuredly not occurred prior to Mr. … (United States Trust Co. v. Heye, 224 N. Y. 242 ; Matter of Schaefer, 178 App.

Terry v. Bale

1 Dem. Sur. 452 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 15, 1882

It does not appear on what terms he was living in his mother’s family; whether it was to pay board, or give his earnings and services to his mother for his board. … No express contract to pay board wras proved, and between near relatives board furnished and services rendered do not raise an implied promise to pay for the same, as in the case of strangers (Bowen v.

In re the Estate of Sauer

13 Mills Surr. 555 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1915

(Huggins v. Huggins, 43 S. E. [Ga.] 759; Levy v. Archenbold, 44 S. W. [Texas] 46; Lowenstein v. Lowenstein, 114 N. Y. 65 ; Roberts v. Law, 4 Sandf. 642 ; Hooley v. Grive, 9 Daly, 104 ; Carrere v. Spofford, 46 How. … (Andrews v. Brown, 21 Ala. 437 ; Dupuy v. Levenworth, 17 Cal. 262 ; Sprague Mfg. Co. v. Hoyt, 29 Fed. 421 .)

In re the Estate of Pulitzer

139 Misc. 575 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 26, 1931

Brown, 29 Ill. 201 .) … (See, also, Packard v. Ill. T. & S. Bank, 261 Ill. 450 ; Curtiss v. Brown , 29 id. 201 ; Denegre v. Walker, 214 id. 113; Matter of Mercer Home, 162 Penn. St. 232; N. J. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v.

In re the Accounting of Gunther

190 Misc. 897 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 27, 1948

Y. 140 ; Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369 ; Caulfield v. Sullivan, 85 N. Y. 153 ; Matter of Douglass, 38 Misc. 609 ). … (Holland v. Alcock, supra; Fairchild v. Edson, 154 N. Y. 199 ; Gross v. Moore, 68 Hun, 412 ; affd., 141 N. Y. 559 .) *901 “The facts in Matter of O’Hara ( 95 N. Y. 403 ) and Amherst College v. Ritch ( 151 N.

In re the Accounting of Security Trust Co.

198 Misc. 7 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 17, 1950

Y. 450 ); United States Trust Co. v. Heye ( 224 N. Y. 242 ), and Soles v. Granger ( 174 F. 2d 407 ). … Light Co. v. Graves, 272 N. Y. 77, 80 ; United States Trust Co. v. Heye, 224 N. Y. 242, 253 , supra; Robertson v. De Brulatour, 188 N. Y. 301, 311 ; Lowry v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 172 N.

In re the Estate of Nelson

125 Misc. 2d 451 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 13, 1984

brought into the county for the purpose of conferring jurisdiction if there was no wrongful intention and other indicia, which will be discussed infra, are also present (see, e.g., Matter of Hughes, 95 NY 55 ; Matter of Brown … Jurisdiction has however been declined when administration in New York was sought for fraudulent or other improper purpose (Hoes v New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R.

In re the Estate of Breckwoldt

170 Misc. 883 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 13, 1939

(Schultz v. Schultz, supra; to like effect see Voorhis v. Voorhis, 50 Barb. 119, 127 ; Early v. Early, 5 Redf. 376, 380, 381 ; Matter of Gethins, 97 Misc. 561, 564 ; Matter of Dorrity, 118 id. 725, 728; St. John v. … Div. 33, 36 ; McNally v. Brown, 5 Redf. 372, 375 .)

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Purdy

1 Pow. Surr. 194 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 27, 1892

Willson, 8 Cowen, 56 ; Newcomb v. Webster, 113 N. Y. 191 , 22 St. Rep. 955 ; and in Harwood v. … Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369 . The cases cited, while not directly in point, however, do show the purpose of the courts to ascertain and as far as possible to carry out the intentions of testators.

In re the Estate of Szabados

40 Misc. 2d 1072 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 3, 1963

(Matter of Reed v. Browne, 295 N. Y. 184 ; Matter of Chalmers, 264 N. Y. 239 ; Matter of Tietz, 39 Misc 2d 895 .)

In re the Accounting of Marvin

193 Misc. 531 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 6, 1948

(Pierrepont v. Edwards, 25 N. Y. 128,131 ; Matter of Mayer, supra, p. 243.) … Y. 77 , supra; Bankers Trust Co. v. Willis, 248 App. Div. 753 ; Spencer v. Spencer, 38 App. Div. 403 , supra.)

In re the Estate of De Camillis

66 Misc. 2d 882 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 11, 1971

(Bumstead v. Read, 31 Barb. 661 , 665 ; Bergan, J. in Mattice v. Kingston Trust Co., 178 Misc. 256 , 258 ; United States ex rel. Rudick v. Laird, 412 F. 2d 16, 20 .) … Nothing to the contrary was decided in O’Connor v. Huggins ( 113 N. Y. 511 ), Matter of McCabe ( 84 App. Div. 145 , affd. 177 N. Y. 584 ) or Matter of Brown ( 131 Misc. 859 ).

In re the Estate of Myles

99 Misc. 2d 501 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 4, 1979

Bank v Kennedy, 167 US 362 , Nassau Bank v Jones, 95 NY 115 ; Investment Co. … Inst. v Camp, 401 US 617, 626-627 , supra.)

In re the Will of Dicks

187 Misc. 1075 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 26, 1946

(See Slosson v. Lynch, 43 Barb. 147, 150 ; New York Life Ins. & Trust Co. v. Hoyt, 161 N. Y. 1, 9 ; Matter of Carroll, 274 N. Y. 288, 302.) … In Ennis v.

In re the Estate of Mendley

154 Misc. 59 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 7, 1935

(Matter of Brown, 131 Misc. 859 .) I am satisfied that the personal property of the decedent has “ come into ” this county in good faith and not for any fraudulent purpose. The objector relies upon Hoes v. New York, N.

In re the Estate of Manley

1 Gibb. Surr. 282 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1895

In Emerson v. Bowers, 14 N. … Elmer v.