Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysurct

1,589 results

0.82s

  • In re the Estate of Hackett

    37 Misc. 2d 1029 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 19, 1962

    (Mount v. Tuttle, 183 N. Y. 358 ; Matter of Merritt, 280 N. Y. 391 ; Wright v. Wright, 225 N. Y. 329 ; Matter of Lawless, 194 Misc. 844 , affd. 277 App. Div. 1045 , motion for leave to appeal denied 302 N. … New York ” will be paid to the Board of Education of the City of New York.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re the Construction of the Will of Turcott

    10 Misc. 2d 461 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 26, 1956

    In support of the possibility of such a latter construction, counsel for petitioners cite Matter of Reed v. Browne ( 295 N. Y. 184 ). In that case (involving income taxe?)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Thompson

    116 Misc. 453 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 15, 1921

    Pickslay v. Starr, 149 N. Y. 432 ; Haviland v. Willets, 141 id. 35; Bayley v. Bayley, 141 App. Div. 243 ; Platt v. Elias, 186 N. … Doucet v. Mass. Bonding & Insur. Co., 180 N. Y. 589 , 603. The assignment was valid, and constituted an absolute conveyance of the legacy. Brown v. Spohr, 180 N. Y. 201, 209 ; McGuire v. Murphy, 107 App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Stoehr's Estate

    23 N.Y.S. 280 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 1, 1893

    In the case of Welch v. Gallagher, 2 Dem. Sur. 40 , it was held that the surrogate’s court had no power to determine a disputed claim for board and apparel of an infant. In Re Kerwin, (Sup.) 14 N. Y.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re the Accounting of State Bank

    1 Misc. 2d 869 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 28, 1956

    Y. 370 ; Camp v. Presbyterian Soc. of Sacketts Harbor, 105 Misc. 139, 145 .) … (Matter of Dillenback, 189 Misc. 538 ; Sherman v. Richmond Hose Co. No. 2, 230 N.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Cardoso

    133 Misc. 244 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1928

    The original contract is merely an agreement on the decedent’s part to pay a specified rate per week four weeks in advance for board, treatment, etc. … (Kirkpatrick Home for Childless Women v. Kenyon, 119 Misc. 349 ; Matter of Daly, 58 App. Div. 49 ; Lorillard v. Clyde, 14 2 N. Y. 456 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Accounting of Quant

    187 Misc. 142 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 25, 1946

    Div. 998 ; Bailey v. Buffalo L., T. & S. D. Co., 213 N. Y. 525 ; Matter of Wilbur, 27 Misc. 126 , mod. sub nom. Matter of Baker, 72 App. Div. 211 , affd. 172 N. Y. 617 ; Matter of Camp, 126 N. Y. 377 ; Mitchell v. … Div. 452 ; Matter of Taylor, 153 Misc. 673 ; Matter of Brown, 129 Misc. 293 ; Matter of Davis, 37 Misc. 326 ; and see Wait on New York Practice [4th ed.], p. 111.) The statute (Civ. Prac.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re the Probate of Last Will & Testament of Brown

    131 Misc. 859 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 16, 1928

    In White v. … And in Hoes v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Taff

    61 Misc. 2d 602 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 21, 1970

    The claim of the Board of Public Welfare is accordingly dismissed.” The Brodine case above referred to is Matter of Brodine (10 A D 2d 414, 416, affd. 13 N Y 2d 734). … Although the instant proceeding is against the parent’s estate, by way of passing the court will refer to Matter of Woods v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of LeFave

    87 Misc. 2d 552 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 21, 1976

    (Matter of Fowler, 263 App Div 255 , affd 288 NY 697 ; Wells v Squires 117 App Div 502 , affd 191 NY 529 .) … See Wells v Squires ( 117 App Div 502 , affd 191 NY 529 , supra), cited with favor in Matter of Trumble (supra).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Clark

    54 Misc. 2d 1015 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 26, 1967

    In the absence of a showing that the terminoloogy used is ambiguous, no extrinsic evidence is admissible to *1022 supply, contradict, enlarge or vary the written words (Brown v. Quintard, 177 N. … In the absence of a showing that the terminology of the will is ambiguous, no extrinsic evidence is admissible to contradict, vary or enlarge the written words used by the testator (Brown v. Quintard, 177 N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bates v. Underhill

    3 Redf. 365 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1878

    In Styles v. … The cases of Sutherland v. Brush ( 7 Johns. Ch., 17 ), Manahan v. Gibbons ( 19 Johns., 109, 427 ), Brown’s Accounting (16 Abb. Pr., [N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Eichler

    84 Misc. 667 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1914

    In Colvin v. … Foster v. Hawley, 8 Hun, 68 ; Gall v. Gall, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Minter

    57 Misc. 2d 270 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 29, 1968

    In the case of Moyers v. Gregory ( 175 Va. 230, 233 ) the Virginia court stated: “If the will is written wholly in the handwriting of the testator and signed by him it is a valid will ”. So too, in the case of Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Racz

    114 Misc. 2d 146 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 25, 1982

    Bank of East Islip v Brower, 42 NY2d 471 ; Gair v Peck, 6 NY2d 97 ; Matter of Schanzer, 7 AD2d 275 , affd 8 NY2d 972 ). … of the Workers’ Compensation Law specifically provides that beneficiaries should not be required to pay any fees with reference to recovering workers’ compensation benefits except as approved by the Workers’ Compensation Board

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Davis

    126 Misc. 233 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 22, 1925

    (Palmer v. Horn, 84 N. Y. 516 ; Low v. Harmony, 72 id. 408.) This rule, however, is not inflexible. It has been held otherwise where, as the court said, “ the reason of the thing demands it.” (Prowitt v. Rodman, 37 N. … (Matter of Brown, 93 N. Y. 295 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Davies

    197 Misc. 827 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 3, 1950

    Jamaica Water Supply Co. v. State Board of Tax Comrs., 196 N. Y. 39, 57 .) “ In People ex rel. Manhattan Ry. Co. v. Woodbury ( 203 N. … Co. v. State Board of Tax Comrs., 212 N.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In re the Accounting of Wamsley

    2 Misc. 2d 482 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 21, 1956

    That result obtains when the life beneficiary of the trust fund is also the remainderman and sole trustee, in which case “ The result is a merger, not merely into a legal life estate, Matter of Reed v. Browne, 295 N. … Ackerman v. Ackerman ( 222 App. Div. 229 , affd. 251 N.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Fraenznick v. Miller

    1 Dem. Sur. 136 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1883

    Brown’s executors filed their accounts in October, 1880, and commenced proceedings before my predecessor for their judicial settlement. … Wright v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Hoag

    1 Gibb. Surr. 341 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1895

    Moore v. Moore, *343 3 Abb. Ct. App. Dec. 303 ; Williams v. Hutchinson, 3 N. Y. 312 ; Ross v. Ross, 6 Hun, 182 . … Reynolds v. Robinson, 64 N. Y. 589 ; Coleman v. Burr, 93 id. 17; Porter v. Dunn, supra; Stamp v. Franklin, 144 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.