Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysurct

1,589 results

1.34s

  • Gladding v. Follett

    2 Dem. Sur. 58 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 15, 1883

    In Thompson v. Brown ( 4 Johns. … The case at bar is much stronger in favor of an allowance to the mother than that of Wilkes v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wyles v. Gibbs

    1 Redf. 382 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1862

    (People v. Utica Ins. Co., 15 Johns., 358 .) The sanctities and immunities that cluster around the marriage contract cannot be guarded too vigilantly. … Walter Brown also testified to conversations with the petitioner in 1852-3, in which the conduct of Jordan was mentioned, in which she stated that Jordan had manifested a disposition to get possession of the child.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Morris

    2 Connoly 372 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1890

    In Hyland v. Baxter,. 98 N. … See, also, Haight v. Brisbin, 100 N. Y. 219 ; Brown v. Bedford, 4 Dem. 304 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Brown

    132 Misc. 2d 811 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 7, 1986

    Brown and petitioner, Kye Suk Brown, in wedlock after having been apprised that the groom’s previous marriage to Dosie Mae Brown had been declared terminated by decree of a local court. … (See, e.g., Sosna v Iowa, 419 US 393 [1975]; Rice v Rice, 336 US 674 [1949]; Sherrer v Sherrer, 334 US 343 [1948]; Williams v North Carolina, 325 US 226 [1945]; Bell v Bell, 181 US 175 [1901]; Atherton v Atherton, 181 US

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re Way

    6 Misc. 484 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1894

    Rollwagen v. Rollwagen, 63 N. Y. 517 . … Delafield v. Parish, 25 N. Y. 35 ; Tyler v. Gardiner, 35 id. 559 ; Rollwagen v. Rollwagen , 63 id. 518 ; Weir v. Fitzgerald, 2 Bradf. 42 . ” *500 The rule invoked is a salutary one, and I think applies to this case.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Ives

    161 Misc. 60 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 16, 1936

    (Bisson v. W. S. R. R. Co., supra; Bodine v. Brown, 12 App. Div. 335, 340 .) … (Bisson v. W. S. R. R. Co., supra; Matter of F. L. & T. Co., 213 N. Y. 168 ; Soper v. Brown, 136 id. 244; Bodine v. Brown, supra; Petry v. Petry, 186 App. Div. 738 ; Jay v. Lee, 41 Misc. 13, 16 .)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Brown

    155 Misc. 620 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 17, 1935

    Powell, and my beloved grandson, Samuel Brown, son of my deceased son, Samuel H. … Brown, share and share alike and to their heirs and assigns forever, subject however as to the share of said Samuel Brown my said grandson to the following provision, trust and condition to wit:” This paragraph of the will

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Palestine

    151 Misc. 100 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 6, 1934

    (Matter of Brown, 131 Misc. 420, 421 .) … (Matter of Brown, 222 App. Div. 52 .)

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of De Stuers

    199 Misc. 777 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 17, 1950

    Rep. 458; Rowley v. Durfey, 230 App. Div. 402 ; Charles v. Scheibel, 128 Misc. 275 , affd. 221 App. Div. 816 ; Champion v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 398 ; Conners v. Winans, 122 Misc. 824 ; 27 R. C. … Browne, 119 Misc. 513 ), and an action in ejectment will lie to recover actual possession of the premises (Powers v. Ingraham, 3 Barb. 576 ; Burkhart v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Browning

    10 Mills Surr. 380 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1913

    The will bequeaths a life estate to two aunts of decedent, Sarah and Anna Browning, if they survive the testatrix, with a remainder to “ such of my beloved sisters, Barbara Browning and Jane Anna Pitt Browning (Jane Gross … The rule laid down in Delafield v. Parish, 25 N. Y. 29 , has been quoted many times with approval by the courts of this state and is reiterated in Matter of Lawrence, 48 App.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Brown

    141 Misc. 2d 572 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 20, 1988

    In the circumstances, an issue is presented whether George Brown has forfeited his right to succeed to any property interest by reason of his wife’s death (Riggs v Palmer, 115 NY 506 ; Matter of Wells, 76 Misc 2d 458 ; cf … This narrow statutory construction is not without judicial support (Higbee v Schwartz, 185 Misc 28 ; In re Gore’s Will, 51 NYS2d 612 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Sonderling

    155 Misc. 403 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 25, 1935

    effective March 7,1933, when it was authorized to suspend any provision of the Banking Law in whole or in part (Moses v. … Y. 562 ; Matter of Brown, 135 Misc. 611 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Mann

    138 Misc. 42 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 30, 1930

    Petry v. Langan, 227 N. Y. 621 ), thus in effect emphatically reaffirming the doctrine of Soper v. Brown . … Jarman and subsequently confirmed in Soper v. Brown .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • In re Berbling

    134 Misc. 730 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 11, 1929

    Thus, in Brown v. … Indeed, this is substantially stated by the Court of Appeals in Brown v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Sheridan

    149 Misc. 2d 519 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 15, 1991

    stipulation in counterparts which consents to the awarding of the sum $13,421.50 to Harris, Beach & Wilcox as legal fees and disbursements on behalf of the attorneys for the various beneficiaries of the estates of Harold Brown … Fund v Grandeau, 72 NY2d 62 ; see also, Judiciary Law § 468-b; 22 NYCRR 7200.1). In addition, the Fund is a special fund of the State with its assets in the custody of the State Comptroller.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of the United States Trust Co.

    12 Mills Surr. 367 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1914

    Brown and Marie E. … Brown and Marie E. Murphy. Of course if this contention of the objectant is sound and the trust term is one for the lives of three annuitants, the limitation is void in its entirety (Brown v. Quintard, 177 N.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Friedman

    166 Misc. 664 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 14, 1938

    (Schermerhorn v. Talman, 14 N. Y. 93, 126 ; Brown v. Robinson, 224 id. 301, 314.) … Sheldon v. Board of Appeals, 234 N. Y. 484, 495 .)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Ancillary Letters of Administration With the Will Annexed of McShane

    8 Mills Surr. 277 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1911

    Campbell v. Tousey, 7 Cow. 64 . See Brown v. Brown, 4 Edw. Ch. 343 ; s. c. 1 Barb. Ch. 189 . McNamara v. Dwyer, 7 Paige 239 . Gulick v. Gulick, 33 Barb. 92 ; s. c. 21 How. Pr. 22 . … Morrell v. Dickey, 1 Johns. Ch: 153. Chapman v. Fish, 6 Hill, 554 . Vroom v. Van Horne, 10 Paige, 549 . Brown v. Brown, 2 Edw. Ch. 343 . Vermilya v. Beatty, 6 Barb. 429 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Nachman

    17 Misc. 2d 363 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 2, 1959

    In Riesenberger v. … Brown.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Whitcomb

    170 Misc. 579 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 18, 1939

    The first consists of Lilia Brown Hinds, Anna Marie Wheeler and Arthur A. … Brown, who assert their status by reason of the alleged fact that their mother, Lilia Brown, was an adopted daughter of the present decedent’s father, Virgil Whitcomb.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.