Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysurct

1,589 results

1.55s

  • In re the Estate of Snell

    33 Misc. 2d 1044 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 20, 1962

    (Matter of Mylod v. Graves, 274 N. Y. 381 .) … (King v. Talbot, 40 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cornwell v. Riker

    2 Dem. Sur. 354 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 15, 1884

    King, 8 Mass., 371 ; Kinne v. Kinne, 9 Conn., 102 ; Harwood v. Baker, 3 Moore P. C., 282; Blanchard v. Nestle, 3 Den., 37 ; Horne v. Horne, 9 Ired. Law, 99 ; Stevens v. Van Cleve, 4 Wash., 267 ; Lowder v. … Lowder, 58 Ind., 538 ; Converse v. Converse, 21 Vt., 168 ; Bleecker v. Lynch, 1 Bradf., 458 ; Maverick v. Reynolds, supra; Crolius v. Stark, supra; Higgins v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Grube

    169 Misc. 170 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 3, 1938

    (Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 266 N. Y. 71, 88 ; Gwynne v. Board of Education, 259 id. 191, 196 ; Crane v. Bennett, 177 id. 106, 112 ; Colonial City Traction Co. v. Kingston City R. R. … (Cheney v. Arnold, 18 Barb. 434, 440 ; affd., 15 N. Y. 345 ; Thompson v. Blanchard, 4 id. 303, 309; Hubbard v. Briggs, 31 id. 518, 533; Erie County Savings Bank v. Roop, 48 id. 292, 298; Best v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of Van Den Heuvel

    9 Mills Surr. 177 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1912

    In Groom v. … Sutton v Sadler, 3 C. B. (N. S.) 87; Cleare v. Cleare, L. R. (1 Prob. & Div.) 555; Fulton v. Andrew, L. R. (7 H. L.) 448; Tyrrell v. Painton (1894), P. 151;. Cartwright v. Cartwright, 1 Phill, 90, 100; Groom v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Bonard's Will

    16 Abb. Pr. 128 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 1, 1872

    Surr. 208 ; Brown v. Lyon, 6 N. Y., 419 ). … Ch., 506 ; Craig v. Craig, 3 Id., 76 ; Martin v. Maugham, 14 Sim., 230 ; Williams v. Williams, 4 Selden, 525 ; Phelps v. Pond, 23 N. Y., 69 ; Kilpatrick *209 v. Johnson, 15 Id., 322; Hanley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of McCafferty

    147 Misc. 179 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 12, 1933

    (Crittenden v. Fairchild, 41 N. Y. 289, 292 ; Kinnier v. Rogers, 42 id. 531, 534, 535; Morse v. Morse, 85 id. 53, 58; Lindo v. Murray, 91 Hun, 335, 337 ; affd., 157 N. Y. 697 .) … (Matter of Denton v. Sanford, 103 N. Y. 607, 612 ; Allen v. Eighmie, 9 Hun, 201 , 202; Vroom v. Van Horne, 10 Paige, 549, 558.)

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Rawson

    1 Mills Surr. 339 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1899

    For several years she seems to have had no permanent home, but drifted about the neighborhood, living here and there as her employment called her, and frequently worked for her board and shelter only. … Clayton v. Wardell, 4 N. Y. 230 ; Brinkley v. Brinkley, 50 id. 184; Badger v. Badger, 88 id. 546; Gall v. Gall, 114 id. 109.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Accounting of JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

    38 Misc. 3d 363 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 31, 2012

    in and/or to any organization where he may be a client or a participant in any program (s) sponsored by them, as the Trustees shall determine, for the general uses of such facility and/or organization.” 8 Article 2.1, § (v) … trusts and estates, and has long been involved in issues around people with intellectual disabilities, having served, inter alia, as co-chairperson of the New York State Association for Retarded Children Trust and on the Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Thomas

    140 Misc. 446 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 29, 1931

    The definition in Rollwagen v. Rollwagen ( 63 N. Y. 504 ) is as adequate as any that has come under our notice. … The testimony of Edward V. Siedle, the notary public who took the acknowledgment of the power of attorney, discloses that he was sent for by Charles M.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.