Case law

In re the Estate of Hooker

173 Misc. 515 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 6, 1940

(Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U. S. 283, 288 ; Knowlton v. Moore, 178 id. 41, 47.) … Caldwell v. Board of Supervisors of Saratoga County, 45 App. Div. 42, 50 ); “ expenditure, outlay or disbursement of money ” (Bowery Bank v.

In re the Estate of Baker

174 Misc. 93 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 30, 1940

(Eidt v. Eidt, 203 N. Y. 325, 328 .) … (Mills v. Husson, 140 N. Y. 99, 104 ; Matter of Kimberly, 150 id. 90; Overheiser v. Lackey, 207 id. 229, 236.)

In re the Adoption of Baby Boy

147 Misc. 2d 873 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 21, 1990

right of a parent, legal guardian or relative within the second degree to place out or board out a child.” … settled that intermediary placements are prohibited as violative of Social Services Law § 374 (2) and § 371 (12) *877 (Matter of Tersigni [Carballo], 137 Misc 2d 553 ; Matter of Unnamed Baby Boy, 110 AD2d 1019 ; Anonymous v

In re the Probate of the Will of MacDowell

16 Mills Surr. 551 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 21, 1916

“All the inmates of .this Home, are to pay board, each week they are there, with their small means. … In Darcy v.

In re the Estate of Bogart

62 Misc. 2d 114 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 10, 1970

Y. 573, 581 ; Healy v. Empire Trust Co., 276 App. Div. 305 , affd. 301 N. Y. 620 ). The conclusion is unavoidable that this will contains no express condition of survival. … Others reach the same conclusion on substantially similar facts (Matter of Brown, 154 N. Y. 313 [“ grandchil *121 dren”]; Fulton Trust Co. v. Phillips, 218 N. Y. 573 [‘ ‘ children ”]; Byrnes v. Stilwell, 103 N.

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Kreidler

7 Mills Surr. 559 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1910

Harwood v. Hewlett, 5 Redf. 339 ; Carroll v. Hughes, id. 337; Burtis v. Dodge, 1 Barb. Ch. 91 ; Code Civ. … DuBois v. Brown, 1 Dem. 317 ; Matter of Niles, 5 Redf. 110 . Mo allowance can be made for days on which adjournments occur without an actual hearing. Matter of Clark, 36 Hun, 301 .

Canfield v. Crandall

4 Dem. Sur. 111 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 15, 1885

V.; Lefevre v. Lefevre, 59 N. Y., 434, 440 ). … Frequently it has been held that the republication of a will by a codicil makes the will speak from the date of the codicil (Kip v. Van Cortland, 7 Hill, 346 ; Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y., 375 ; 1 W’ms. on Ex’rs, 216).

In re the Estate of Mullin

143 Misc. 256 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 1, 1932

Div. 685, 686 ; King v. Ross, 21 id. 475; Burns v. Lipson, 204 id. 643, 645; Brandt v. City of New York, 99 id. 260, 261; Stanley v. Block, 56 id. 549, 550; Smith v. … J. 639.) ” Other authorities to like effect are Barber v. Morgan ( 51 Barb. 116, 132 ); Evertson’s Ex’rs. v. Miles ( 6 Johns. 138, 141 ); Wells v. Jewett ( 11 How. Pr. 242, 245 ); Brown v.

In re the Will of Powers

27 Misc. 2d 179 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 14, 1960

(Salter v. Browne, 205 N. Y. 204 ; Matter of Fishel, 167 Misc. 145 , affd. 256 App. Div. 915 , motion for leave to appeal denied 280 N. … Y. 358 ; Dwight v. Gibb, 208 N. Y. 153 ; Matter of Welsh, 5 Misc 2d 378 ; Matter of Butts, 4 Misc 2d 430 , supra; Matter of Benedict, 103 N. Y. S. 2d 722).

In re the Temporary Administration upon the Estate of Chittenden

9 Mills Surr. 126 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1912

Brown, S. This is an application to remove Herbert J., Chittenden as temporary Administrator of the goods, chat *127 tels and credits of Charles T. … In Dubois v.

In re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Barnes

11 Mills Surr. 347 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1913

In Matter of ICelsey v. Church, 112 App. … Brown referee, to take the proper evidence upon all the questions presented by this application, and to report such evidence, together with his findings and recommendations thereon, to this court. Settle order on notice.

In re the Estate of Daubney

153 Misc. 2d 120 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 27, 1992

(Cf., Matter of Maul v Fitzgerald, 78 AD2d 706 .) … Blum, 93 AD2d 605 ; Matter of Oddo v Blum, 83 AD2d 868 ).

In re Catherine G

79 Misc. 2d 731 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 25, 1974

She does not explain why she did not bestir herself to board a bus or other transportation, not even once, to see the boy in his own county after school, or at other occasions. … (Ford v. Ford, 371 U. S. 187 ; Ford v. Ford; Full Faith and Credit to Child Custody Decrees?, 73 Yale L. J. 134.) A permanent, adoptive home is necessary to serve the best interests of the child. In Rothstein v.

In re the Accounting of McDowell

102 Misc. 275 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1918

Ormiston v. Olcott, 84 N. Y. 343 . … Fritz v. City Trust Co., supra.

In re the Estate of Chilson

54 Misc. 2d 51 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 23, 1966

As Judge Bmrgan stated in Forman v. … “It is well established that a husband may voluntarily contract to bind himself and his estate for maintenance and support after death (Wilson v. Hinman, 182 N. Y. 408 ; Barnes v. Klug, 129 App.

In re the Estate of Linson

38 Misc. 2d 971 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 8, 1963

of the will of the testatrix read as follows: twelfth : *' * * I give, devise and bequeath all my residuary estate as follows: The sum of five thousand dollars ($5,000) to each and every of the following organizations: BOARD … out of the dictionary ’, since there ‘ is no more likely way to misapprehend the meaning of language * * * than to read words literally, forgetting the object which the document as a whole ’ seeks to achieve ” (Spencer v.

In re the Estate of Bommer

159 Misc. 511 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 22, 1936

(Meinhard v. Salmon, 249 N. Y. 458, 464 .) … (Appleby v. City of New York, 271 U. S. 364 ; Fletcher v. Peck, 6 Cranch, 87, 136 ; Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518, 624, 656 ; Farrington v. Tennessee, 95 U. S. 679, 683 ; Carondelet Canal Co. v.

In re the Estate of Spruce

188 Misc. 776 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 21, 1947

(Lent v. Howard, 89 N. Y. 169, 177 ; Mott v. Ackerman, 92 N. Y. 539 ; Russell v. Hilton, 80 App. Div. 178, 186-187 , affd. 175 N. Y. 525 ; Bogert v. Hertell, 4 Hill 492 , 500-502; Williams v. Williams, 152 App. … (Brown v. Spohr, 180 N. Y. 201 ; 2 Warren’s Heaton on Surrogates’ Courts [6th ed.], § 201, par. 1, subpar. [a].) Here we have the first two elements, but by statute the third is lacking.

Vogel v. Tunick

19 Misc. 3d 853 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 14, 2008

, supra; Riccio v Ghulam, 29 AD3d 558 [2006]; Kazimierski v New York Univ., 18 AD3d 820 [2005]). … NY2d 143, 148 [1984]; Matter of Witbeck, 245 AD2d 848, 850 [1997]), and subject to a six-year statute of limitations (see CPLR 213; Board of Educ. of Sachem Cent.

In re the Estate of Bonora

44 Misc. 3d 171 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 20, 2014

Rubin v Irving Trust Co., 280 App Div 348 [1st Dept 1952]). … Browne ( 267 App Div 643 [3d Dept 1944]), that a court-appointed guardian cannot change the domicile of his or her ward, instead finding that the evolution of the case law over the past 70 years evidences that depending upon