Case law

People ex rel. Roosevelt v. Edson

1 How. Pr. (n.s.) 482 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 15, 1885

Lang v. Brown ( 6 Hun, 256 ) is cited. It states that judges of the common pleas are county judges on the authority of Matter of Morgan ( 56 N. Y., 269 ). … Ireland v.

Huth v. New York Mutual Insurance

8 Bosw. 538 · The Superior Court of New York City · Oct 19, 1861

In Oliver v. … In Cheriot v.

United States Trust Co. v. Harris

2 Bosw. 75 · The Superior Court of New York City · Oct 17, 1851

S., 589, 3, 1; 3 Corns. 479, 485, 486, Gillet v. Moody; 5 Barb. R. 12, Leavitt v. Blatchford.) 1. … He must show that some deceit was practised, to put him, off his guard. * (McCracken v. Cholwell, 4 Seld. 133; Johnson v. Titus, et al., 2 Hill, 606 ; Fay's Adm. v. Richards, 21 Wend. 626 ; Van Epps v.

Chaine v. Wilson

8 Abb. Pr. 78 · The Superior Court of New York City · Oct 15, 1858

V. Under the Code ample provision is made for commencing suits against absent or non-resident debtors. They are thus made amenable to our courts,’and the former reason for the remedy by attachment no longer remains. … In New Jersey was his house, his shelter, his fireside, his bed and board.

Chapman v. Phenix National Bank

12 Jones & S. 340 · The Superior Court of New York City · Nov 4, 1878

But until that will shall be expressed, no power of condemnation can exist in any of the courts (Brown v. United States, 8 Cranch, 110 ). … Thus, in Hunt v.

Pryor v. Foster

17 N.Y. St. Rep. 472 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 13, 1888

Whitney v. Allaire, 1 *473 N. Y., 308 -9; Smith v. Countryman, 30 id., 670-675; Krumm v. Beach, 96 id., 398. … Miller v. Barber, 66 N. Y., 558 ; Strong v. Strong, 102 id., 69. In Krum v. Beach (96 N.

Johnson v. Bank of North America

5 Rob. 554 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 15, 1868

(Porter v. Talcott, 1 Cowen, 384. Olcott v. Rathbone, 5 Wend. 490 . Kobbi v. Underhill, 3 Sandf. Ch. 277. Cromwell v. Lovett, 1 Hall, 56 . S. C. 6 Wend. 369 . Vail v. Foster, 4 N. Y. Rep. 312 . Turner v. … (Legge v. Thorpe, 12 East, 171. Brown v. Maffey, 15 id. 216. Rucker Miller, 16 id. 43. Robinson v. Ames, 20 John. 146 . Van Wart v. Smith, 1 Wend. 227 .)

Shipman v. Burrows

1 Hall 399 · The Superior Court of New York City · Feb 15, 1829

[Moody v. Baker, 5 Cowen, 353. Opin. of Woodworth, J.] … In the case of Harding v.

Fogarty v. Cullen

17 Jones & S. 397 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 3, 1883

Farwell. 15 Beav. 31; Kirwan v. Kirwan, 2 C. & M. 617; Blew v. Wyatt, 5 Car. & P. 397; Gough v. Davies, 4 Price, 200; Oakford v. European, &c. Co., 1 Hem. & M. 182; Harris v. Lindsay, 4 Wash. C. C. 271 ). Blew v. … Ed.]; Ex parte Kendal, 17 Vesey, 522, 525; Oakley v. Pusheller, 4 Cl. & Fin. 207; Brown v. Gordon, 16 Bear. 302; 1 Lindsley Partn. 366, 367). The dictum of Chancellor Kent in Hamersley v. Lambert ( 2 Johns.

Delafield v. DeGrauw

9 Bosw. 1 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 7, 1861

This view of the rights of the parties is fully sustained we think, by Grant v, Johnson, (1 Seld., 247,) and does not conflict with Tompkins v. Elliot, ( 5 Wend., 496 .) … (Wiltsie v. Northam, 3 Bosw., 169 ; Gleason v. Moen, 2 Duer, 644 .)

Iden v. Sommers

29 Jones & S. 177 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 2, 1892

Enc. of Law, 782, note 3; Paton v. Sheppard, 10 Sim., 186 ; Manning v. Purcell, 2 Sim. & G., 284. … In Dayton v.

Belmont v. Coleman

1 Bosw. 188 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 9, 1857

I have long considered that Slee v. … In the case of Freeland v.

McDowell v. Second Avenue Railroad

17 Bosw. 670 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 2, 1860

The following subsequent cases, before and since the Code, have been examined: Talcott v. Bronson, ( 4 Paige, 501 ,) Sweet v. Bartlett, (4 Sandf. S. C. R., 661,) Brown v. Comstock, ( 10 Barb., 67 ,) Haight v. … In Cole v.

Keyser v. Harbeck

3 Duer 373 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 27, 1854

In Rowley v. … Keyser himself put the goods on board to be transported to California. Eeceipts imposing that obligation on the master had been taken by the plaintiff.

Pegram v. Carson

10 Bosw. 505 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 25, 1863

(Stevens v. Wilson, Covill v. Hill, Bonito v. Mosquera, and Cartwright v. Wilmerding, supra.) In none of these cases, except Govill v. … In Williamson v. Brown, (15 N. Y.

Cosulich v. Standard Oil Co.

23 Jones & S. 384 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 6, 1888

Co. v. Bowner, 11 Wall. 129 . To the same effect it has been held in Mullen v. St. John, 57 N. Y. 567 ; Losee v. Buchanan, 51 N. Y. 476 ; Gerlach v. Edelmeyer, 47 Super. Ct. 292 ; aff’d, 88 N. Y. 645 ; Caldwell v. … The case of Young v.

Potter v. Seymour

17 Bosw. 140 · The Superior Court of New York City · Feb 12, 1859

Board, the carpenter, also states that he did the carpenter’s work on the building, and made his contract for it with Bunting. It was begun in June and finished in November. … The counsel in Norton v.

Boardman v. Davidson

7 Abb. Pr. 439 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 15, 1869

Among the cases thus cited is Mortimer v. … One of these cases is that of Reppier v. Buck (5 B.

Jones v. Roach

41 Jones & S. 248 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 1, 1876

In the recent case of Plank, administrator, &c., v. The New York Central and Hudson River R. R. Company ( 60 N. … In so doing, he stepped into a sluice which ran under the tracks, across which a board or plank was laid ; otherwise the trench was left open.

Field v. Syms

2 Rob. 35 · The Superior Court of New York City · Feb 13, 1864

Walter v. Bennett, ( 16 N. Y. Rep. 250 ,) in my opinion, is decisive upon the question arising in this case. Belknap v. Sealey, ( 2 Duer, 570 , 583 ; S. C. 14 N. Y. … (Saltus v. Genin, 3 Bosw. 250 , 263 ; and see S. C. 10 Abb. Pr. 478 ; Gasper v. Adams, 28 Barb. 441 ; 3 Bosw. 456 , 520; 2 id. 590; Code, § 171.)