Case law

Chapman v. Phœnix National Bank

5 Abb. N. Cas. 118 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 15, 1878

But until that will shall be expressed, no power of condemnation can exist in any of the courts (Brown v. United States, 8 Cranch, 110 ). … Thus in Hunt v.

Gilbert v. Beach

5 Bosw. 445 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 10, 1859

Until the principle stated in Blake v. Ferris, (supra;) Stevens v. Armstrong (2 Seld., 435;) Pack v. The Mayor, (4 id., 222;) Kelly v. The Mayor, (1 Kern., 432,) and Storrs v. … This was decided in Bush v.

Murphy v. Central Park, North & East River Railroad

16 Jones & S. 96 · The Superior Court of New York City · Feb 6, 1882

The conductor testified in - substance that plaintiff had not paid his fare; that he ran after the car for some distance, evidently intending to steal a ride ; that he boarded it between First and Second avenues ; that, upon … (Isaacs v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 47 N. Y. 122 ; Mott v. Consumer’s Ice Co., 73 Id. 543 ; Hughes v. New York and New Haven R. R. Co., 36 Super. Ct. 222).

Butler v. Manhattan Railway Co.

53 N.Y. St. Rep. 664 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 3, 1893

Butler, the plaintiff’s wife, was boarding one of defendant’s trains, she was struck on the side by the gate which the train guard was closing. … The case of Sherman v. R. R. Co., 106 N. Y., 542 ; 11 St. Rep., 318 , cited by the learned counsel for the appellant, is not in conflict with this rule.

Gleadell v. Thomson

3 Jones & S. 232 · The Superior Court of New York City · Feb 1, 1873

The case of Redmond v. Liverpool, N. Y. &. Phil. S. S. Co., 46 N. … See also Ostrander v. Brown, 15 Johns. R. 39; McAndrew and others v. Whitlock, 2 Sweeney, 623.

Driscoll v. West, Bradley, & Cary Manufacturing Co.

4 Jones & S. 488 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 31, 1874

becomes the absolute owner of the stock described in it; or rather, of all the vendor’s property and interest in such stock, wholly independent of any act of ratification or dissent on the part of the company (See McNiel v. … allowed to be trans *499 ferred on the "books of the company if the person in whose name the stock shall stand shall "be indebted to the com]Dany, unless with the consent of. the president and treasurer, or by a vote of the board

Mayor of New York v. Cooper

17 Jones & S. 409 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 17, 1883

Such a rule is implied in the decision of Danolds v. State ( 89 N. Y. 36 ), while in cases that involve the same fundamental principle, general phrases may be restrained (Nicholas v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. … whether some were unfit for use without repair and some were fit, and thus being conscious of what the facts were, it would be the action of the mind *414 of the individual commissioners which would precede any action of the board

Cullen v. Cullen

23 Jones & S. 346 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 6, 1888

In this case the judgment was one separating the parties from bed and board, thus giving no right to the plaintiff to re-marry. … Kamp v. Kamp, 59 N. Y. 212 ; Griffin v. Griffin, 47 N. Y. 134 ; Erkenbrach v. Erkenbrach, 96 N. Y. 456 .

Oakley v. Aspinwall

2 Sandf. 7 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 8, 1848

(See the opinions delivered in Townsend v. Carman , before cited.) And the case of Mervin v. … (Bridge v. Gray, 14 Pick. 55 .)

Griffin v. Cranston

1 Bosw. 281 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 20, 1857

If the Bank of Utica v. … In Darling v.

Samuels v. McDonald

11 Abb. Pr. 344 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 15, 1871

Barclay, 2 Barn. & Ald., 702 ; Stephenson v. Hart, 4 Bing., 476; Youl v. Harbottle, 1 Peake Cas., 49 ; Lubbock v. Inglis, 1 Stark., 104). … In Tolano v.

Sanford v. Eighth Avenue Railroad

7 Bosw. 122 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 30, 1860

(Vanderbilt v. Richmond Turnpike Co., 2 Comst. 479 ; Wright v. Wilcox, 19 Wend. 343 ; *136 Weed v. The Panama R. R. Co., 17 N. Y. R. 362; Story on Agency, sec. 456 to 462; Phil. R. R. Co. v. Derby, 14 How. U. … (Elliott v. Brown, 2 Wend. 497 .)

Bowen v. Trustees of the Irish Presbyterian Congregation

19 Bosw. 245 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 10, 1860

Steam Saw Mill Association, 6 Paige, 54; Leggett v. The New Jersey Manufacturing and Banking Company, Saxt. Ch. R., 541; Jackson v. Campbell, 5 Wend., 575 ; Hoyt v. Thompson, 1 Seld., 335, 355, 356.) … The doubt expressed in The Dutch Church v.

Simis v. Brookfield

13 Misc. 569 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 15, 1895

In Hume v. Mayor, 74 N. … The cases of People v. Mayor, 59 How. Pr. 277 , and Ely v. Campbell, Id. 333 , show how the courts have enforced the performance of duties akin to those the plaintiff seeks to enjoin. In People v. Mayor, 18 Abb. N.

Savage v. Corn Exchange Fire & Inland Navigation Insurance

17 Bosw. 1 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 11, 1858

(See Miller v. The Eagle Life and Health Ins. Co., 2 E. D. Smith, 286, and cases there cited; and Peacock v. New York Mutual Ins. Co., 1 Bosw., 338 .) … (See 2 Sandfi, ubi supra, and Grinnell v. Schmidt, id., 706; Stilwell v. Staples, 6 Duer, 63 ; Bogart v. O'Regan, 1 E. D. Smith, 590.)

Eells v. Lynch

8 Bosw. 465 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 13, 1861

In McGowan v. … (Wood v. Wood, 5 Paige, 597 ; Hawley v. James, 16 Wend., 71 ; Howe’s Exrs. v. Van Schaick, 20 Wend., 564 .)

Keene v. Clark

2 Abb. Pr. 341 · The Superior Court of New York City · Feb 15, 1867

An objection that a certificate was not duly authenticated, does not present the question whether it contained the necessary facts (Waterville Manufacturing Company v. Brown, 9 How., 27 ). … A general objection to receiving an instrument in evidence will not render an objection to the form of a certificate authenticating it available on appeal (Mabbett v. White, 12 N. Y. [2 Kern.], 442).

Levy v. Burgess

6 Jones & S. 431 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 4, 1875

The case is therefore unlike French v. Carhart (1 N. Y. R. 96); Moore v. Meacham (10 Id. 207); Hinneman v. Rosenbach (39 Id. 98); Field v. … And whatever law stock brokers, or the brokers’ board may make for itself, it must yield, if it is not sanctioned by the courts.

McKeon v. See

4 Rob. 449 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 6, 1837

Ice Co. v. N. Western Ins. Co., 23 N. Y. Rep. 357 . Barlow v. Scott, 24 id. 40.) … A neighbor’s light may be obscured by a wall built upon one’s land, without such responsibility, because the right so to build is part of the elements of ownership; (Mahan v. Brown, 13 Wend. 91 ; Parker v.

Hutson v. Mayor of New York

5 Sandf. 289 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 27, 1851

—(Adsit v. Brady, supra.) … The doctrine of the Mayor of Lyme Regis v. Henly, has been recognised as good law by the supreme court in the cases of the Mayor, &c., v. Furge, and Adsit v.