Case law

Brown v. Ney

26 Jones & S. 583 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 5, 1890

Ryle v. Brown

18 Jones & S. 174 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 3, 1884

Brown v. Combes

4 Jones & S. 572 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 28, 1873

Griffith v. Brown

28 How. Pr. 4 · The Superior Court of New York City · Oct 15, 1864

M'Curdy v. Brown

1 Duer 101 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 26, 1852

R. 119, 783; Combie v. Davies, 7 East. 5; Rice v. … Smith, 1 Bos. and Pull. 563; Holbrook v. Wight, 24 Wend. 196 ; and Grosvenor v. Phillips, 2 Hill, 145 .

Brown v. Purdy

22 Jones & S. 109 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 30, 1886

The rule and its limitations are given in Underwood v. Green ( 42 N. Y. 140 ). … These opinions led them to make an honest report to the Health Board. The statutes had made it their duty to report cases of contagious diseases.

Murphy v. Kipp & Brown

1 Duer 659 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 15, 1853

Murphy, Administratrix of Murphy, v. Kipp & Brown. At Chambers, Jan., 1853.

Stone v. Duffy & Brown

3 Sandf. 761 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 15, 1851

The successful defendant, Brown, is entitled to his costs. The construction we gave to § 305 of the code, in Comstock v. Bayan'd, 2 Sand. 705, decides this question. … (Belcling v. Gonklmg, 4 Howard’s P. R. 196; Wheeler v. Westgate, ibid. 269.)

Mallory v. Wood & Brown

6 Duer 657 · The Superior Court of New York City · Oct 15, 1856

Pierce v. Brown

8 Jones & S. 398 · The Superior Court of New York City · Feb 7, 1876

Brown, who claims a separate bill of costs. … In the case of Allis v. Wheeler ( 56 N.

Kipp & Brown v. Wiles

3 Sandf. 585 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 20, 1850

. - What would have been a reasonable time was a question for the jury, taking into consideration all the circumstances of the case, (Ellis v. Thompson, 3 Mees. & Weis. 445.) … (Davis v. Shields, 24 Wend. 322 .)

Brown v. Davis

6 Duer 549 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 28, 1857

(Morris v. Wadsworth, 17 Wend. 103 .) It is quite clear, at all events, as between the plaintiff and de *562 fendant, that this $15,000 was not to be at the risk of the success of the new firm. … Brown may be liable, as a general partner, to all who have dealt with the firm. (1 R. S. 765, § 8.)

Brooklyn Oil Works v. Brown

38 How. Pr. 451 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 1, 1870

Brown v. Post

6 Rob. 111 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 15, 1868

(Graves v. Dash, 12 John. 19 . Denston v. Henderson, 13 id. 322. De Rham v. Grove, 18 Abb. 43 . Story’s Confl. of Laws, §§ 309, 311. Cash v. Kennion, 11 Ves. 314. Grant v. Healey, 3 Sumn. 523 . Smith v. Shaw, 2 Wash. C. … S. 174,) Rodes v. Bronson, ( 34 N. Y. Rep. 649 ,) and Murray v. Harrison, ( 47 Barb. 484 ; 45 id. 579, 618 ,) would have been applicable.

Brown v. Richardson

4 Rob. 603 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 27, 1865

(Richards v. Walton, 12 John. 434 . Cruikshank v. Gardner, 2 Hill, 333 . Sheldon v. Quinlen, 5 id. 441 . Harman v. Brotherson, 1 Denio, 537 . Smith v. Huestis, Hill & Den. Sup. 236. Moulton v. Norton, 5 Barb. 286 .) … (Bate v. Fellowes, 4 Bosw. 638 .)

Kleinberger v. Brown

26 Jones & S. 4 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 4, 1890

In Champlin v. … This case was cited with approval in Judson v. Easton, 58 N.Y. 664 .

Franklin v. Brown

21 Jones & S. 474 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 2, 1886

There is no responsibility on the landlord in such cases, except such as arises from absolute delictum on his part (Jaffe v. Harteau, 56 N. Y. 398 ; Meeks v. Bowerman, 1 Daly, 99 ; Wallace v. Lent, Ib. 481 ; Coulson v. … C. 60 ; Sutphen v. Seebas, Ib. 61).

O'Rourke v. Brown

22 Jones & S. 384 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 2, 1887

Banning v. Carpenter, 48 N. Y. 412 ; Smith v. Colvin, 17 Barb. 157 ; Schermerhorn v. Merrill, 1 Id. 511; Evertsen v. Sawyer, 2 Wend. 507 ; People v. Nelson, 13 Johns. 340 , and other cases. … Kiersted et al. v. O. & A. R. R. Co., 69 N. Y. 343 .

Tochman v. Brown

1 Jones & S. 409 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 1, 1871

The case of Erben v. Lorillard, 19 N. Y. 299 , even when taken in its broadest latitude (and not as qualified and explained by Mandeville v. Guernsey, 51 Barbs 99), is not in point.

Rockwell v. Brown

1 Jones & S. 380 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 1, 1871

The plaintiff, therefore, in order to establish his right to recover, should have proved the proceeding and the assignment under the same (Best v. Strong, 2 Wend. 319 , Salters, v. … Hoag v. Hoag, 35 N.