Case law

Lowry v. Inman

6 Abb. Pr. 394 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 15, 1869

Law, 139 ; Story Confl. of L., § 556 ; 2 Kent Com., ed. of 1866, 559 ; Brown Com., 45, 46 ; Westlake Private Int. Law, Art. 468 ; Id., Art. 166 ; Watriss v. Pierce, 32 N. H, 582; Titus v. … To the same effect are the following cases : Dudley v. Mayhew (3 N. Y. [3 Comst.], 9); Hardman v. Brown (39 Id., 196); Smith v. Lockwood ( 13 Barb., 209 ); Eastern Arch. Co. v. Queen (2 El. & Bl.); People v.

Van Wickle v. Mechanics' & Traders' Insurance

16 Jones & S. 95 · The Superior Court of New York City · Feb 6, 1882

The action is on a policy of insurance upon a cargo of coal shipped on board of the canal-boat W. S. Storms, from South Amboy, N. J., to New York city. The defense is unseaworthiness. … This was presumptive evidence of unseaworthiness at the time of her sailing (Wright v. Orient Mut. Ins.

Henderson v. Jackson

9 Abb. Pr. 293 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 15, 1870

Pr., 594 et seq.; Brown Comm., 738; Lord Campbell, C. J., in Churchill v. Siggers, 3 Ell. & Bl, 937; Leyland v. Tancred, 16 Q. B., 669; De Medina v. Grove, 10 Adol. & El. N. S., 168; 10 Jur., 426; 11 Id., 145). … Bailey, 50 Barb., 78 ; Fellerman v. Dolan, 7 Abb. Pr., 395 ; Brown v. Cunningham, 21 H ow. Pr., 192).

Bennett v. American Art Union

5 Sandf. 614 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 15, 1852

(United States v. Grundy, 3 Cranch, 33 .) … United *639 States v.

Hegeman v. Cantrell

8 Jones & S. 381 · The Superior Court of New York City · Feb 7, 1876

The practice has long prevailed that the court may of its own accord send the jury back to reconsider their verdict, when it appears to be a mistaken one, before it is received and recorded (Root v. … R. 103; Brown n. Clifford, 7 Lansing, 53 ; Vermilye v. Palmer, 52 N. Y. 475 ).

People ex rel. New York Underground Railway Co. v. Newton

34 N.Y. St. Rep. 584 · The Superior Court of New York City · Dec 1, 1890

Mygatt v. Supervisors, etc., 11 N. Y., 563 ; People ex rel. Perkins v. Hawkins, 46 id., 9; People ex rel. Martin v. Brown, 55 id., 191.

Walsh v. Commercial, Steam Laundry Co.

11 Misc. 3 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 15, 1895

Neg. 983; Burke v. Witherbee, 98 N. Y. 562 ; Probst v. Delamater, 100 id. 266; Marsh v. Chickering, 101 id. 396; Hickey v. Taaffe, 105 id. 26 ; Stringham v. Hilton, 111 id. 188; Dobbins v. Brown, 119 id. 188; Kern v. … Gibson v. R. R. Co., 63 N. Y. 449 ; Shaw v. Sheldon, 103 id. 667; Sweeny v. Berlin Co., 101 id. 520 ; Hickey v. Taaffe, supra; Appel v. R. R. Co., 111 N. Y. 550 ; McQuigan v. R. R. Co., 122 id. 618 ; Reiss v.

Strempel v. Rubing

21 N.Y. St. Rep. 483 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 10, 1889

Loubat v. Le Roy, 15 Abb. N. C., 3 -44, at seq.; Ebbinghousen v. Worth Club, 4 Abb. N. C., 300 . … People v. Young Men’s, etc., Society, 65 Barb., 357 .

Chamboret v. Cagney

2 Sweeny 378 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 30, 1870

This point has been expressly decided by this court, at General Term, in Xenia Bank v. Lee ( 2 Bosw., 694 ; 7 Abb., 372 ). See, also, to same effect, Brown v. Buckingham ( 11 Abb., 387 ; 21 How., 190 ). … Pattison v.

Towle v. Forney

11 Duer 164 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 20, 1855

In Clarke v. … In Cochran v.

Scott v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.

29 Abb. N. Cas. 435 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 15, 1893

Brown v. Wakeman, 18 N. Y. Supp. 363 ; s. c., 45 State Rep. 671. Action for eviction. … Wingate v. Haskins, 20 Weekly Dig. 438. Action for the board of defendant’s wife. The defense was that the person boarded by plaintiff was not defendant’s wife.

Strong v. Dollner

2 Sandf. 444 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 21, 1849

(See Brown v. Frost, 10 Paige, 247 .) The contract was not complete as to the purchaser himself, until he paid the whole price. … Catlin v. Jackson, ex dem. Gratz, 8 Johns. 520, 550 ; Lathrop v. Ferguson, 22 Wend. 116 .)

Clarissy v. Metropolitan Fire Department

7 Abb. Pr. 352 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 15, 1869

I know it has been said in some of the cases (Lyon v. Adams, 4 Serg. & R., 443 ; Gardner v. Board of Health of New York, 10 N. … Local Board of Health, 8 Ell. & B., 801 ; Mersey Dock Trustees v. Gibbs, 1 Ho. of Lords, 93).

Vanwyck v. Guthrie

11 Duer 268 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 3, 1855

The defendants, as a committee of the Trustees of the College of Pharmacy, in the city of New York, made a report which was adopted by the Board, and ordered to be transmitted to the Secretary of the Treasury-of the United … It is within the principle established in this state, in Branderzee v.

Wood v. Mulock

16 Jones & S. 70 · The Superior Court of New York City · Feb 6, 1882

In Hess v. … In Malins v. Brown ( 4 N.

Fleeman v. Fleeman

39 N.Y. St. Rep. 307 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 10, 1891

Jones v. Zoller, 32 Hun, 280 . In Price v. … Hoyt v. Thompson, 19 N. Y., 207, 215-218 ; Olcott v. Tioga R. Co., 27 id., 559; Porter v. Robinson, 30 Hun, 211 .

Clason v. Corley

5 Sandf. 447 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 8, 1852

(See Giles v. Comstock, 4 Comst. 275; Astor v. Turner, 11 Paige, 436 .) … S. 192, § 158), and the court does not interfere to compel a delivery of the possession, until the master’s report of sale, which in foreclosures follows the execution of the deed, has been duly confirmed (Brown v.

Wallace v. Bennett

1 Abb. N. Cas. 478 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 15, 1877

J., Onslow v. Horne, 3 Wils. 177.) … It contains only a caution to applicants to inform themselves of the kind of house kept by the proprietor, before engaging board and lodging.

Moore v. Williams

10 N.Y. St. Rep. 475 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 23, 1887

The assignment to Brown, and the release by Brown to the defendants, cannot vary the result when all the attending and surrounding circumstances are considered. … Delevan v. Duncan, 49 N.Y., 485 ; Cockcroft v. R. R., 69 id., 206; Ocean National Bank v. Olcott, 46 id., 16, et seq.; Sturtevant v. Sturtevant, 20 id., 40.

Hovey v. Broeck

3 Rob. 316 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 24, 1865

The cases of Aiken v. Wasson, ( 24 N. Y. Rep. 482 .) and Ericsson v. Brown, ( 38 Barb. 390 ,) must be regarded as standing by themselves, and as establishing no general principle. … In the case of Oonant v.