Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
969 results
2.00s
Century Indem. Co. v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.
2024 NY Slip Op 51359(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Oct 1, 2024
Co. v Brooklyn Union Gas Co. ( 2024 NY Slip Op 51359(U) ) [*1] Century Indem. Co. v Brooklyn Union Gas Co. 2024 NY Slip Op 51359(U) Decided on October 1, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Lebovits, J. … Permitting a surreply is not warranted in these circumstances. ( See Board of Mgrs. of the 100 W. 93 Condominium v 660 Columbus Retail Owner , 227 AD3d 458 , 459 [1st Dept 2024].)
Cited 1 timesUnpublished2024 NY Slip Op 51355(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Sep 23, 2024
Retail Fish Inc. v Todtman, Nachamie, Spizz & Johns, P.C. , 158 AD3d at 502; Wilson v Brown , 162 AD3d 1054 [2d Dept 2018]; Silber v Silber, 84 AD3d 931 [2d Dept 2011]). … McAuliffe , 209 AD3d 1119 ; Levine v N.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCentury Indem. Co. v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.
2024 NY Slip Op 51359(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Oct 1, 2024
Co. v Brooklyn Union Gas Co. ( 2024 NY Slip Op 51359(U) ) [*1] Century Indem. Co. v Brooklyn Union Gas Co. 2024 NY Slip Op 51359(U) Decided on October 1, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Lebovits, J. … Permitting a surreply is not warranted in these circumstances. ( See Board of Mgrs. of the 100 W. 93 Condominium v 660 Columbus Retail Owner , 227 AD3d 458 , 459 [1st Dept 2024].)
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedScrowcroft v. George S. Hall, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 31115(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Apr 3, 2024
Scrowcroft v George S. … Supreme Court, held the Board did not waive its sovereign immunity, and that States retain their sovereign immunity from private suits brought in the courts of other States.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2025 NY Slip Op 50800(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · May 21, 2025
Citing to Turner v. … Relying on Turner v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedFESI Holdings, Inc. v. Kamylon Holdings, LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 31784(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · May 15, 2025
E. v Vitiello, 159 AD3d 766 [2d Dept 2018]). … Sealing has been allowed to preserve the confidentiality of records concerning the internal finances of a party which are of minimal public interest (see D'Amour v Ohrenstein & Brown, LLP, 17 Misc
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDavis v. Manhattan Chelsea Mkt. LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 32002(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Jun 4, 2025
Davis v Manhattan Chelsea Mkt. … The First Department has also held that boarding up windows to prepare premises for demolition constitutes “altering” (Santiago v Rusciano & Son, Inc., 92 AD3d 585, 585 [1st Dept 2012]).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLopez v. NG 645 Madison Ave. LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 30804(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Mar 13, 2024
Lopez v NG 645 Madison Ave. … He was told that there was about 10,000 to 12,000 volts going through the board to the tray he cut (id. at 58-59).
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedKuvshynov v. Fox News Network, LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 52088(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Dec 29, 2025
Handman (Davis Wright Tremaine LLP) Mary V. Rosado, J. … Brown v New York Design Center, Inc. , 215 AD3d 1, 3-4 [1st Dept 2023] [building owner owed duty to employees of businesses operating in building for purposes of negligent infliction of emotional distress claim]).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2024 NY Slip Op 34555(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Dec 18, 2024
bill of particulars, relevant medical records, the transcripts of the parties’ deposition testimony, and a statement of allegedly undisputed material facts, along with the expert affirmation of board … particulars, by submitting a counterstatement of material facts, transcripts of the parties’ deposition testimony, relevant medical and hospital records, an attorney’s affirmation, and the affirmation of board-certified
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMatter of Pride Intl. Realty, LLC v. Daniels
2004 NY Slip Op 50665(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Apr 28, 2004
Pope v United States, 599 F2d 1383 (5th Cir 1979); Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v I.T.O. Corp. of Baltimore, 508 F2d 945 (4th Cir 1974); Timken Co. v United States Customs Service, 531 F Supp 194 (D DC 1981). … Kwasnik v City of New York, 262 AD2d 171 (1st Dept 1999), citing Matter of Miracle Mile Assocs. v Yudelson, 68 AD2d 176 (4th Dept 1979).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2025 NY Slip Op 31962(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Jun 3, 2025
Board of Education of Taconic Hills Central School District (249 AD2d 741, 743 [3d Dept 1998]), A finding of negligent supervision must rest on a demonstrable basis for concluding that the harm was … Under Monell v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2024 NY Slip Op 51360(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Oct 2, 2024
Rts. v Besdad, Inc. , 143 AD3d 987, 989 [2d Dept 2016]; Young v Geoghegan , 250 AD2d 423, 424 [1st Dept 1998]). … "[A] breach of a duty of care resulting directly in emotional harm is compensable even though no physical injury occurred" ( Brown v New York Design Ctr., Inc. , 215 AD3d 1 , 9 [1st Dept 2023]).
Cited 2 timesUnpublished2026 NY Slip Op 30689(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Feb 25, 2026
Brokerage, Inc. v Home Ins. … “[P]ublic policy mandates free access to the courts" (Board of Educ. of Farmingdale Union Free School Dist. v Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Assn., Local 1889, AFT AFL-CIO, 38 NY2d 397, 404 [1975
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2024 NY Slip Op 51360(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Oct 2, 2024
Rts. v Besdad, Inc. , 143 AD3d 987, 989 [2d Dept 2016]; Young v Geoghegan , 250 AD2d 423, 424 [1st Dept 1998]). … "[A] breach of a duty of care resulting directly in emotional harm is compensable even though no physical injury occurred" ( Brown v New York Design Ctr., Inc. , 215 AD3d 1 , 9 [1st Dept 2023]).
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedMoss v. Mount Sinai Beth Israel
2024 NY Slip Op 34559(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Dec 5, 2024
Ctr., 70 AD3d 15, 24 [1st Dept 2009]; see Roques v Noble, 73 AD3d 204, 206 [1st Dept 2010]; Elias v Bash, 54 AD3d 354, 357 [2d Dept 2008]; DeFilippo v New York Downtown Hosp., 10 AD3d 521, 522 [1st … Noble, 73 AD3d at 206;.Joyner-Pack v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedR & D Maidman Family L.P. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.
2004 NY Slip Op 24201 · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Apr 26, 2004
As a result, both buildings were inspected by the New York City Department of Buildings, resulting in several "Environmental Control Board Notice[s] of Violation and Hearing" (notices of violation) issued to plaintiffs and … In Ryan v Royal Ins.
Cited 0 timesPublished2024 NY Slip Op 31982(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Jun 6, 2024
Condominium v Singer, 186 AD3d 1477, 1478 [2d Dept 2020]). … Fork Radiology, P.C., 171 AD3d 888, 892 [2d Dept 2019] ["allegations that the other shareholders and board members of the radiology corporations purposefully excluded the plaintiff from shareholder
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMunoz v. Isabella Geriatric Ctr. Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 31334(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Apr 17, 2025
Munoz v Isabella Geriatric Ctr. … Further, plaintiff maintains that the submitted expert affidavit from a board ·certified physician demonstrates a potentially meritorious opposition to the defendants' motion for summary
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRedHill Biopharma Ltd. v. Kukbo Co., Ltd.
2024 NY Slip Op 32846(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Aug 13, 2024
VI, LLC v APP Intl. Fin. … Exhibit 10 to the Jun affirmation is a notice for a meeting of RedHill's board of directors. Exhibit 36 to the Jun affirmation is a copy of a letter sent to Red Hill by the U.S.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna