Case law

Brown v. Board of Education

110 Misc. 2d 164 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1981

Brown is a resident and taxpayer of defendant school district. … The appropriate standard herein is the rational basis test (Board of Educ. v Nyquist, 94 Misc 2d 466 ) and a rational basis exists for the differences in classifications between a city school district and a noncity school

Brown v. Board of Education

76 Misc. 2d 923 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1974

The court holds that petitioner has stated a cause of action similar in principle to those recognized in the cases of Matter of Bergstein v. Board of Educ., Union Free School Dist. … No. 1 (42 A D 2d 591); Matter of Tischler v. Board of Educ. of Monroe Woodbury Cent. School Dist. (37 A D 2d 261) and Matter of *926 Di Prima v. Board of Educ., Cent. School Dist. No. 1 (N. Y. L.

Brown v. Board of Education

44 Misc. 2d 466 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1964

Agone, 37 Misc 2d 255, 261-264 , affd. 19 A D 2d 761; Matter of Glass v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 21 A D 2d 891; see, also, Record on Appeal Matter of Loucks v. Board of Educ., City of Amsterdam, 258 App. … Patterson v. Board of Educ., Syracuse, 295 N. Y. 313, 319 ). Petition granted.

Brown v. Board of Education

70 Misc. 399 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1911

Nassoiy v. Tomlinson, 148 N.Y. 326; Sarecky v. Board of Education, 67 Misc. Rep. 294 , Putman, J.; De Moulin v. Board of Education, Burr, J., N. Y. L. J., March 12, 1907; Ryan v. City of New York, 177 N. … Y. 271 ; Grady v. City of New York, 182 id. 18; Sheehan v. Board of Education, 120 App. Div. 557 , affd., 193 N. Y. 627 .

Brown v. Ulster County Board of Elections

100 Misc. 2d 570 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1979

There is before this court a letter from petitioner Harold Brown in his capacity as Chairman of the Ulster County Democratic Party dated August 9, 1979 addressed to the Ulster county Board of Elections which he intended to … It is conceded that the aforesaid letter from Brown does not comply with the requirements of section 6-166 of the Election Law.

People ex rel. Brown v. Board of Trustees

71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 633 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1892

People ex rel. Brown v. Board of Supervisors

46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 654 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1886

Brown v. Board of Education

32 Misc. 3d 370 · New York Supreme Court · May 24, 2011

The Board of Education of the Mahopac Central School District (the Board) granted petitioner Maura Ann Brown (petitioner) a probationary appointment to the position of high school science teacher in 2007. … The Board’s reliance on Matter of Maras v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Schenectady ( 275 AD2d 551, 552 [3d Dept 2000]) is misplaced.

People ex rel. Brown v. Board of Trustees of Owego

20 N.Y.S. 303 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1892

People ex rel. Brown v. Board of Supervisors

1 How. Pr. (n.s.) 241 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1885

affidavit of the chairman of the board. … Brown). It is the reception of the order by the claimant that gives his final right to the money. Before the order has been issued the supervisors may reconsider, review and recall their previous action.

People ex rel. Brown v. Board of Supervisors

1 How. Pr. (n.s.) 1 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1885

People ex rel. Brown v. New York State Parole Board

90 Misc. 2d 124 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1976

Allah v Warden, Bronx House of Detention ( 47 AD2d 485 [1st Dept]), held that the State Board of Parole cannot indefinitely postpone a final revocation hearing merely because the parolee is being held pending disposition … Maggio v Casscles, 28 NY2d 415 ). Action taken by the Parole Board to either grant or revoke parole is deemed a judicial function and is not reviewable if done in accordance with law (People ex rel.

Brown v. Brown

53 Barb. 217 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1869

(President, &c. of Bank of Poughkeepsie v. Hasbrouck, 2 Seld. 216. Glover v. Holley, 2 Brad. 291 . 2 R. S. 94, § 65.) This section declares as to what subjects it shall be conclusive. … This opinion was expressed in President, &c. of Bank of Poughkeepsie v. Hasbrouck, above cited.

Brown v. Brown

34 Barb. 533 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1861

(Phelps v. Bostwick, 22 Barb. 314, 317 . Cole v. Wendel, 8 John. 116 . Waldron v. Willard, 17 N. Y. Rep. 468 . Davison v. Seymour, 1 *537 Bosw. 94 . Perkins v. Goodman, 21 Barb. 218 . Sheldon v. Peck, 13 id. 317 . … (Brown v. Treat, 1 Hill, 225 . Suydam v. Smith, 7 id. 182 . Miller v. Scherder, 2 Comst. 262. Lambert v. Snow, 17 How. 517 . McGovern v. Payn, 32 Barb. 91 .)

Brown v. Brown

16 Barb. 569 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1852

.- (Platt v. Arthur, 10 Barb. 9 . Beck v. McGillis, 9 Id. 35 . Rose v. Rose, 7 Id. 174.) The case of Walton v. Walton, (7 John Ch. … (Ellison v. Miller. 11 Barb. 332 . Arthur v. Arthur, 10 Id. 9. Pond v. Bergh, 10 Paige 140,149 .)

Brown v. Brown

71 Misc. 2d 818 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1972

It also provides that the child’s parents ‘ ‘ shall have visitation rights to be set by the Probation Department,” recognizing that “in fixing the rights of visitation for Michelle Brown (the mother) to keep in mind that … Only if1 she is not a fit person to do- so, may a nonparent be considered to undertake the task (Matter of Spence-Chapin Adoption Serv. v. Polk, 29 N Y 2d 196, 203).

Brown v. Brown

23 Barb. 565 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1857

The cases of Stanwood v. Stanwood, ( 17 Mass. Rep. 57 ,) Phelps v. Phelps, ( 20 Pick. 556 ,) Ames v. New, ( 5 Metc. 320 ,) and Fish v.

Brown v. Brown

122 Misc. 2d 849 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1984

(Zipparo v Zipparo, 70 AD2d 616 .)

Brown v. Brown

54 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1888

Brown v. Brown

109 N.Y.S. 637 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1908