Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.85s
Frankel v. American Film Technologies, Inc.
177 Misc. 2d 279 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1998
(Aronson v Lewis, at 814.) The plaintiff asserts that demand on the Board of Directors was not necessary because such demand would be futile. … The court must make inquiry “into the substantive nature of the challenged transaction and the board’s approval thereof.” (Aronson v Lewis, supra, at 814.)
Cited 0 timesPublished24 Misc. 3d 740 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2009
the Board “should be given considerable weight.” … Co. v State Tax Commn., 61 NY2d 393, 400 [1984].)
Cited 0 timesPublished5 Silv. Sup. 9 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1889
McClave, Id. 583; Gibbons v. Phoenix, 61 Id. 619; Goldberg v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 60 Id. 586; Olena v. Huntington, Id. 535; Matter of Williams, 61 Id. 618; Miner v. Brown, Id. 620; McBride v. Orange Co. R. R. … Rep. 917; Brown v. 73d St. R. R. Co., 56 Supr. 356; Storck v. Met. E. R. Co., 39 N. Y. St. Rep. 263; Latham v. Delaney, Id. 369; Dreher v. Connolly, 16 Daly, 106 ; People ex rel. Kunse v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBenvenuto v. Village of Millerton
10 Misc. 3d 770 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2005
(Dental Health Assoc. v Zangeneh, 267 AD2d 421 [2d Dept 1999].) … A proceeding under CPLR article 78 partakes of the character of a motion for summary judgment, in which the court must determine whether or not there is a triable issue of fact (CPLR 7804 [h]; Matter of Gagnon v Board of
Cited 0 timesPublished69 Misc. 38 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1910
His salary was duly fixed an'd authorized by the board of estimate and .apportionment and the board of aldermen. … Stutzbaeh v. Coler, 168 N. Y. 416 ; People ex rel. Wanzor v. Sturgis, 38 Misc. Rep. 433 ; Matter of McCloskey v. Willis, 15 App. Div. 594 .
Cited 0 timesPublished69 Misc. 2d 456 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1972
Matter of People v. Ackerman, 24 Misc 2d 83, 84 [1960]). … Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding, 2 A D 2d 430 [1st Dept., 1956].)
Cited 3 timesPublishedMullahey v. Waterford Citizen's Party, Inc.
136 Misc. 2d 784 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1987
Brown, J. … (Matter of State of New York v Bevis Indus., 63 Misc 2d 1088 ; Matter of Kleinhans Co. v Kleinhans’ Cleaners, 5 Misc 2d 1077 .)
Cited 1 timesPublished8 Johns. 277 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1811
This case cannot be materially distinguished from that of Craig v. The United Insurance Company. (6 Johns. Rep. 226.) … Matilda., (Craig v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFranklin v. Associated Musicians
204 Misc. 521 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1953
The answer is that they have such right if their grievance is lawful but not if it isn’t (Rochette & Parzini Corp. v. Campo, 301 N. Y. 228 ). … There is no contention that plaintiff consented to the union’s trial board as an arbiter.
Cited 0 timesPublished7 Lans. 264 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1873
Kamp., 1 Kern., 441; Haydock v. Stow, 40 N. Y., 367 .) … (See Robinson v. Cusman, 2 Den., 153 ; Jackson v. Little, 12 Wend., 105 .)
Cited 1 timesPublished64 Misc. 352 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1909
In the case of Radcliff v. Mayor, 4 N. … This rule is stated by Judge Clifford, in the case of Water Company v.
Cited 1 timesPublished174 Misc. 446 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1940
New York and Queens Gas Co. v. McCall, 219 N. Y. 84 .) There is ample reason for such law. … The recent case of Matter of Cowen v. Reavy ( 283 N.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRoland v. International Railway Co.
136 N.Y.S. 290 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1912
Fluker v. Ziegele Brewing Co., 201 N. Y. 44 , 93 N. *292 E. 1112 , Ann. Cas. 1912A, 793; Knupfle v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 84 N. Y. 488 ; McGrath v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Co., 63 N. Y. 522 ; Donnelly v. … Such was the case of Anderson v. Third Avenue Ry. Co., 36 App. Div. 309 , 55 N. Y. Supp. 290 , as where the complaint alleged that the plaintiff was injured while attempting to board a car when stopped.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGresov v. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp.
40 Misc. 2d 569 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1963
The dicta in this decision was followed in Hoover v. Allen ( 180 F. Supp. 263 ) and in Sorin v. Shahmoon Ind. ( 30 Misc 2d 429 ). … as being brought by a director (Handler v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAssets Realization Co. v. Howard
70 Misc. 651 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1911
Chase v. Lord, 71 N. Y. 446 ; Lowry v. Inman, 46 id. 119; Barnes v. Wheaton, 8 Hun, 80 . … Jennings v. Jennings, 7 N. Y. 547 ; Schettler v. Smith, 41 id. 328; Tiers v. *689 Tiers, 98 id. 568; Cross v. United States Trust Co., 131 id. 330; Sawyer v. Cubby, 146 id. 192; Fowler v. Ingersoll, 127 id. 472.
Cited 10 timesPublished21 Misc. 2d 221 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1959
If the Board of Arbitration adjusts upward the labor grade assigned, the adjustment to employees on the job shall go back to the date of original assignment to the job for the time worked on the job. “ 24. … Paper Co. v. Fishko, 144 N. Y. S. 2d 643, affd. 286 App. Div. 1009 ; Matter of Local 138, Int. Brotherhood of Teamsters, N. Y. L. J., June 19, 1957, p. 6, col. 8; Matter of Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories [Baker], 154 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished141 Misc. 2d 71 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1988
(See, Porter v State, 94 Nev 142, 576 P2d 275 [1978]; State v Brown, 17 Wash App 587, 564 P2d 342 [1977] [court had the sound discretion to decide on the lack of qualifications of expert witness]; State v Valencia, 118 Ariz … (People v Brown, 117 Misc 2d 587 [Westchester County Ct 1983] [expert’s research had not reached the required level of scientific acceptance]; United States v Sims, 617 F2d 1371 [9th Cir 1980].)
Cited 9 timesPublished66 Misc. 541 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1908
People v. Albany & Vermont R. R. Co., 24 N. Y. 261 . Neither is a taxpayer’s action an appropriate remedy. … Mayor v. Starin, 106 N. Y. 1 . Both these defendants are merely volunteers.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNew York State Teachers' Retirement System v. Department of Assessment & Taxation
20 Misc. 2d 747 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1960
Co. v. City of New York, 282 N. Y. 306 ). … January 14, 1959 — New York State Teachers Retirement Board approved drawings and specifications submitted by Mr.
Cited 1 timesPublished156 Misc. 131 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1935
Hoefle v. Cahill, 188 N. Y. 489 .) The question involved is discussed in Matter of Naughton v. Boyle ( 129 Misc. 867 ). … The fact that the superintendent of public works is appointed by the board of trustees does not militate against the conclusion that he exercises sovereign power. (People ex rel. Jacobus v. Van Wyck, 157 N. Y. 495 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna