Case law

Richardson v. Bohemia Fire District

75 Misc. 2d 837 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1973

bond resolution adopted by a fire district are referred to in section 38:00 of the Lotial Finance Law entitled ‘ ‘ Referenda on bond resolutions or capital note resolutions; fire districts and other district corporations V, … The notice of the election or meeting to which such proposition or resolution was submitted or of the meeting at which the 'finance board adopted such resolution # * * “ 4.

Argus Co. v. Mayor of Albany

7 Lans. 264 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1873

Kamp., 1 Kern., 441; Haydock v. Stow, 40 N. Y., 367 .) … (See Robinson v. Cusman, 2 Den., 153 ; Jackson v. Little, 12 Wend., 105 .)

People v. Soto

8 Misc. 3d 350 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 28, 2005

In Mungo v Duncan ( 393 F3d 327 [2d Cir 2004]), the Second Circuit joined the Tenth and Eighth Circuits (see Brown v Uphoff, 381 F3d 1219 [10th Cir 2004], cert denied sub nom. … Brown v Lampert, — US —, 125 S Ct 940 [2005]; Evans v Luebbers, 371 F3d 438 [8th Cir 2004], cert denied sub nom. Evans v Roper, — US —, 125 S Ct 902 [2005]; cf.

In re Becker

198 Misc. 219 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1950

Pearson v. Probate Court ( 309 U. S. 270 ); see, also, Matter of Brown (46 N. Y. S. 2d 575, revd. on other grounds, 268 App. Div. 886 ) and Sporza v. German Sav. Bank ( 192 N. Y. 8, 18 ).

Jarrard v. Bissell

5 Silv. Sup. 9 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1889

McClave, Id. 583; Gibbons v. Phoenix, 61 Id. 619; Goldberg v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 60 Id. 586; Olena v. Huntington, Id. 535; Matter of Williams, 61 Id. 618; Miner v. Brown, Id. 620; McBride v. Orange Co. R. R. … Rep. 917; Brown v. 73d St. R. R. Co., 56 Supr. 356; Storck v. Met. E. R. Co., 39 N. Y. St. Rep. 263; Latham v. Delaney, Id. 369; Dreher v. Connolly, 16 Daly, 106 ; People ex rel. Kunse v.

Jamaica Savings Bank v. Toomey

77 Misc. 2d 887 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1974

(Rachlin & Co. v. Tra-Mar, 33 A D 2d 370; Gelco Bldrs. v. Simpson Factors Corp., 60 Misc 2d 492 ; Jamaica Sav. Bank. v. Giacomantonio, 59 Misc 2d 704.) … The Banking Board has set the maximum interest rate for these types of transactions first at 7.25% and now, presently, at 8.50%. (3 NYCRR 4.1.)

Harris v. Pearsall

116 Misc. 366 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1921

The plaintiff took an appeal from the judgment of the Special Term and presented a resolution at a stockholders meeting asking that the board of direcstockholders ’ meeting asking that the board of directors be instructed … Bank v. Birch, 130 N. Y. 221 ; Bowen v. Mandeville, 95 id. 237 ; Cramer v. Brownell, 166 App. Div. 456 ; Clapp v. McCabe, 84 Hun, 379 ; Wilson v. Ewald, 61 Misc. Rep. 286 ; Heidelbach v.

Barnes v. Allen

30 Barb. 663 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1860

(Schuneman v. Palmer, 4 Barb. 225 , &c.) … Lott, Emott and Brown, Justices.]

Warner v. Kaplan

22 Misc. 3d 518 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 28, 2008

[M]ere conclusions, expressions of hope or unsubstantiated allegations or assertions are insufficient” (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980] [citations omitted]; see also, Gilbert Frank Corp. v Federal Ins … Altman was approved by the board. Ms.

Gratton v. Dido Realty Co.

89 Misc. 2d 401 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1977

Corp., supra; Shell Oil Co. v McGraw, 48 AD2d 220 ; Strochak v Glass Paper Making Supplies Co., 239 App Div 312 ). … v Robinson, 224 NY 301, 314 ; Boston Rd.

Central Trust Co. v. N. Y. City & Northern Railroad

18 Abb. N. Cas. 381 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1886

V. … Texas, 20 Wall,, 72; Goodman v. Simons, 20 How. (U. S.) 365 ; Murray v. Lardner, 2 Wall. 110, 121 ; Commissioners v. Clark, 94 U. S. 278 ; Seybel v. Nat. Currency B’k, 54 N. Y, 288; Coloma v. Eaves, 92 U.

Harriman Woods Associates v. Town of Monroe

145 Misc. 2d 69 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1989

Contrs. v Board of Trustees, 42 AD2d 660, 661 ). … Assn. v Town of Guilderland, 141 AD2d 293, 300 .)

Holmes v. Davis

21 Barb. 265 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1855

(Lang v. Ropke, 1 Duer, 701 .) … (Costigan v. The Mohawk and Hudson R. R. Co. 2 Denio, 609 . Baker v. Wheeler, 8 Wend. 505 . Lempriere v. Pasley, 2 T. R. 505, 508. Brown v. Sax, 7 Cowen, 95. Silsbury v. McCoon, 3 Comst. 381-385, per Ruggles J.

Cohen v. Bloomberg

24 Misc. 3d 740 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2009

the Board “should be given considerable weight.” … Co. v State Tax Commn., 61 NY2d 393, 400 [1984].)

City of Buffalo v. Kellner

90 Misc. 407 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1915

Lochner v. New York, 198 U. S. 45 ; Ives v. South Buffalo R. Co., 201 N. Y. 305 . Such an exercise of power has been sometimes ah tempted, but as often condemned. … Wooster v. Maher, 141 N. Y. 337 .

In re Barton

69 Misc. 38 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1910

His salary was duly fixed an'd authorized by the board of estimate and .apportionment and the board of aldermen. … Stutzbaeh v. Coler, 168 N. Y. 416 ; People ex rel. Wanzor v. Sturgis, 38 Misc. Rep. 433 ; Matter of McCloskey v. Willis, 15 App. Div. 594 .

Ga Nun v. Palmer

63 Misc. 77 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1909

It seems to be well established by the case of Henry v. Rowell, 31 Misc. Rep. 384 , affirmed by the Appellate Division of the Second Department upon appeal, on the opinion of Mr. Justice (Gaynor at Special Term, 63 App. … While, in that case, the plaintiff elected to claim upon a quantum, meruit for the value of the twelve years of board and lodging already furnished, the reasoning of. the opinion of Mr.

In re of Certain Freeholders in the Town of Owasco

13 N.Y. St. Rep. 9 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1888

People v. Board of Supervisors, 93 N. Y., 397 . … Cross v. Morristown, 18 N. J. Eq., 305; State v. Morristown, 33 N. J., 57; Dillon on Municipal Corporations, §§ 534-538 inclusive.

Ralph D. Young, Inc. v. Town of West Seneca

11 Misc. 2d 897 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1958

If the town board refuses to do this, the plaintiff may force the town board to audit the claim through the means of an article 78 proceeding. (Bragg v. Town of Victor, 84 App. Div. 83 ; People ex rel. McCabe v. … If the board audits and rejects the claim, the remedy of the plaintiff to review the action of the town board is also by an article 78 proceeding. (People ex rel. Myers v. Barnes, 114 N. Y. 317 ; London Guar. & Acc.

Moreno v. Segal

17 Misc. 2d 833 · New York Supreme Court · May 5, 1959

Act, § 244; Brown v. Leigh, 49 N. Y. 78 ; Durham v. Chapin, 13 App. Div. 94 ; Mendoza v. … (Sharp v. Clapp, 15 App. Div. 445 .) In finding the ruling of the court below correct, the Court of Appeals continued (Everitt v.