Case law

77 E. 12 Owners, Inc. v. Yager

137 Misc. 2d 138 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1987

Accordingly, in Fillman v Axel ( 63 AD2d 876 [1st Dept 1978]), the court ruled that the board of directors of an apartment corporation had the authority to convert the apartment building’s manually operated elevators. … (Kamin v American Express Co., 86 Misc 2d 809 [Sup Ct, NY County 1976], affd 54 AD2d 654 [1st Dept 1976]; Garrison Apts. v Sabourin, 113 Misc 2d 674 .)

Federal National Mortgage Assoc. v. Graham

67 Misc. 2d 735 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1971

A substantial right of the defendants herein, not being prejudiced by the failure to fully comply with section 1355, the court may disregard such irregularities (CPLR 2001; Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. … City Sav. & Loan Assn. v. Brown, 33 Misc 2d 996 ).

In re City of New York

30 Misc. 3d 816 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2010

Corp. v Goldfeld, 54 AD2d 1099, 1100 [1976], citing Matter of County of Westchester v Baruch, 247 NY 398, 401 [1928]; Matter of Schmieder, 130 Misc 136, 142 [1927]; Matter of Board of Water Supply of City of New York, 75 … Corp., 54 AD2d 1099 ; Board of Educ., City School Dist. of City of Elmira v Daly, 23 AD2d 597 [1965]), the court finds that such an award in this case would be inappropriate.

Laufer v. Boynton Furnace Co.

32 N.Y.S. 362 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1895

BROWN, P. J. … In White v. Miller, 71 N.

White v. Witteman Lithographic Co.

12 N.Y.S. 188 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1890

Be Graff v. Railroad Co., 76 N.Y. 125 ; Hickey v. Taaffe, 99 N. Y. 204 ,1 N. E. Rep. 685, and cases cited. … The case of Brown v. Railroad, 22 IT.

In re the Dissolution of Kaufman Circle Express Co.

177 Misc. 106 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1941

Div. 653 ; Matter of Brown Brothers, Inc., 111 Misc. 294 .) … (Hitch v. Hawley, 132 N. Y. 212 ; Matter of Woven Tape Skirt Co., 8 Hun, 508 .)

Barnes v. Feuer

79 Misc. 2d 448 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1974

Such delegation of authority would be consistent with current law (Election Law, § 15; Matter of Bauman v. Fusco, 45 Misc 2d 326, 329-330 , affd. 23 AD 2d 404 , affd. 16 N Y 2d 952). … V, § 3) the Executive Committee was authorized to act. Section 3 of article IV of these rules furthei* provides that in the absence of the chairman the vice chairman shall perform his functions.

National Bank of North America v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 3

93 Misc. 2d 590 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1977

Kingsley Smith, J.), the Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry was added as a party respondent, since the joint board administrates the pension plans which are the subject of this proceeding. … (Wadsworth v Whaland, supra, p 77.)

People ex rel. Lawrence v. Schell

5 Lans. 352 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1872

This is a common-law certiorari to review the proceedings of the defendant Schell, as commissioner in laying out a road “ from the settlements in Lewis county to Brown’s tract in Herkimer county,” under an act of the legislature … (The People v. Overseers of th e Poor of the Town of Berne, 44 Barb., 467 ; The People v. Stryker, 24 id., 649 ; Starkweather v. Seeley, 45 id., 165 ; Golden v. Botts, 12 Wend., 234 .)

In re Driscoll

131 Misc. 613 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1928

(Martin v. Camp, 219 N. Y. 170 ; 220 id. 653; 221 id. 631; Matter of City of New York, 219 id. 192.) … It is significant that Judge Cardozo, on the appeal of Andrewes v. Haas ( 214 N. Y. 255 ) ignores the above statement and almost *616 foretells -the reversal of Martin v. Camp ( 161 App.

Wrought Iron Bridge Co. v. Barnett

1 N.Y. St. Rep. 600 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1886

Lament v. Haight, 44 How., 1 . Towns are not hable to reimburse the commissioners. People ex rel. Loomis v. Board Town Auditors, 75 N. Y., 316 . People ex rel. Van Keuren v. Town Auditors, 74 N. Y., 310 ; Olmsted v. … Loomis v. Board of Town Auditors, 75 N. Y., 317 ; Dickinson v. City of Poughkeepsie, id., 65. It is a familiar rule that highway commissioners are not agents for the town. People ex rel. Van Keuren v.

Same v. Collins

43 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 534 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1885

(Bennett v. Van Syckel, 18 N. Y., 481 ; Knapp v. Brown, 45 id., 207; Genet v. Davenport, 59 id., 648; Murphy v. Spaulding, 46 id., 556.) … (Knapp v. Brown, supra; Benkhard v. Babcock, 27 How., 391 .) The true rule seems to be that laid down in Wait’s Practice. (4 Wait’s Prac., 216.)

People's Bank v. St. Anthony's Roman Catholic Church

46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 498 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1886

In Packard v. … And this rule was followed in Adriance v. Roome ( 52 Barb., 399 ) and Dabney v.

Wiltwyck School for Boys, Inc. v. Perry

24 Misc. 2d 281 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1960

Subsequently the determination of the Board of Appeals was reviewed by this court and by decision dated January 7, 1960, the Board of Appeals was upheld. … (Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U. S. 365 [1926]; Wiggins v. Town of Somers, 4 N Y 2d 215 [1958]; Wulfsohn v. Burden, 241 N. Y. 288 [1925]; Bond v. Cooke, 237 App. Div. 229 [3d Dept., 1932].

Wald v. Nassau Chapter Civil Service Employees Ass'n

72 Misc. 2d 723 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1973

The restriction, understood by both the union and the county officials, was that the proposal was subject to formal ratification by vote of the CSEA membership and by the County Board of Supervisors. … Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 854 v. Town of Oyster Bay, N. Y. L. J., Oct. 14, 1968, p. 18, col. 5.)

Levitt & Sons, Inc. v. Young

189 Misc. 922 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1947

As was said in Zahn v. Board of Public Works ( 274 U. S. 325, 328 ): “ The most that can be said is that whether that determination was an unreasonable, arbitrary or unequal exercise of power is fairly debatable. … Euclid v. Ambler Co., supra, 388, 385 ; Radice v. New York, 264 U. S. 292, 294 ; Hadacheck v. Los Angeles, 239 U. S. 394, 408-412, 413-414 ; Cusack Co. v. City of Chicago, 242 U. S. 526, 530-531 ; Rast v.

Arnold v. Gramercy Co.

30 Misc. 2d 852 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1961

The letter contained the following statement: “ the Board does not wish to make any commitments regarding the installation of the kitchen or electrical equipment.” … The'Gram case is cited in Hall v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. ( 282 App.

Woodward v. Harris

2 Barb. 439 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1848

(Ben edict v. Lynch, 1 John. Ch. Rep. 373. 2 Story’s Eq. Jur. § 723.) … Brown v. Newall, 2 Mylne & Craig, 570.) The writ will not be awarded in doubtful cases, or new ones not coming within well established principles. (Bonaparte v. Camden & Amboy R. R. Co., 1 Bald. Cir. C. Rep. 218.)

W. S. 23 Realty Corp. v. City of New York

106 Misc. 2d 271 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1980

applications on August 16,1979 and its denial was sustained by this court in a CPLR article 78 proceeding entitled Stratford Place Corp. v Board of Estimate (Index No. 18294/ 79). … The constitutionality of the City’s in rem tax foreclosure law has been long established (Nelson v New York City, 352 US 103 ; Sonmax, Inc. v City of New York, 43 NY2d 253 ).

Ackerman v. Price Waterhouse

156 Misc. 2d 865 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1992

supra [on examination of corporate accounts]; Ford’s Inc. v Russell Brown & Co., supra [at audit]; Isaacson, Stolper & Co. v Artisan’s Sav. … Rather, courts have consistently held such participation was of no significance (see, Brower v Davidson, Deckert, Schutter & Glassman, supra; Snipes v Jackson, supra; Leonhart v Atkinson, supra; Ford’s, Inc. v Russell Brown